Lewis, did you or anyone else feel that you were pushed to git?
While your story has a bit of @infra-specific business to it, the majority
of it and flex's seem to be composed of 'we heard that git was cool, so we
moved to it, and we stepped on a rake.'
Personally, I wouldn't recommend that any c
Ross, agreed. A list of potential "gotchas" would be sensible!
On 27 April 2013 17:26, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Let me repeat again that the value I see in the Flex report is that it
> identifies some issues that projects moving to git should consider and plan
> for. This will make other projects
Let me repeat again that the value I see in the Flex report is that it
identifies some issues that projects moving to git should consider and plan
for. This will make other projects migrations smoother.
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 26 Apr 2013 18:35, "Luciano Re
I interpreted Luciano's -1 as a general "I am not in favour of this
proposal", which seems like a perfectly valid use. Even if it were being
cast _as_ a veto on some code change or other, I still think it would be
valid, as it comes with justification. (That other people might disagree
with that ju
Luciano Resende wrote on Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:34:39 -0700:
> -1 for using Apache Flex's bad experience, as a concrete example, as this
> might give the wrong perception about Git at Apache.
Sorry, invalid veto. You can't veto people from citing a datapoint
because it's not favourable to one si
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I just wanted to thank you for the feedback you provided in your last
> board report with respect to your experiences with moving to Git. This
> kind of information is really useful to those in other projects. For
> the benefit of the archives
On 26 April 2013 18:18, Alex Harui wrote:
> It is true that there is less negativity about git every day in the Flex
> community. I doubt we will go back to SVN.
>
> I'm not sure it is worth blogging it. The draft of the report is captured
> on the dev@flex.a.o archives so it is public and searc
On 4/26/13 2:41 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> I just wanted to thank you for the feedback you provided in your last
>> board report with respect to your experiences with moving to Git. This
>> kind of information is real
Yes, good point Bertrand. Me being a glass half full kind of person I
read the original content as positive in the sense it provided
valuable forewarning for those planning on moving to Git. I was hoping
that we could express it as "this is what you should plan for if you
choose to switch to Git",
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I just wanted to thank you for the feedback you provided in your last
> board report with respect to your experiences with moving to Git. This
> kind of information is really useful to those in other projects...
Note that the Flex team'
10 matches
Mail list logo
