Yes, good point Bertrand. Me being a glass half full kind of person I read the original content as positive in the sense it provided valuable forewarning for those planning on moving to Git. I was hoping that we could express it as "this is what you should plan for if you choose to switch to Git", we certainly don't want Git vs SVN content.
Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 26 April 2013 10:41, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Ross Gardler > <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: >> I just wanted to thank you for the feedback you provided in your last >> board report with respect to your experiences with moving to Git. This >> kind of information is really useful to those in other projects... > > Note that the Flex team's view on Git as they reported it is fairly > negative - this is totally understandable considering the history of > how and when the move happened in that project, but other Apache > projects are not seeing those issues at all. > > I suspect this negative view will evolve over time - either the > project will revert to svn or they will be happy with Git after > finding their groove. With this in mind, it would be better to post > that information to http://blogs.apache.org/flex/ as something that's > valid at this point in time ("where we are with Git today"), and maybe > just add the essential, more durable information and links to the > comdev website. > > -Bertrand
