On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Anjana G Bhattacharjee
wrote:
> -1 (unbinding)
>
> because this vote, and the "dot it" slip, reminds me of a problem of
> relevance when "dotting the i's and crossing the t's" when framing any vote,
> so to speak
I'll admit, I'm often "lazy" when it came to consen
On 7/16/2010 2:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Comdev people, please vote on folding women@ into this mailing list,
see also [1].
The idea is to close the women@ list and/or or setup an autoresponder
that directs people to this list instead.
+1
[x] +1 let's dot it
-jean
-1 (unbinding)
because this vote, and the "dot it" slip, reminds me of a problem of
relevance when "dotting the i's and crossing the t's" when framing any vote,
so to speak
in this case, would suggest that there may be a significant difference
between the options of:
(a) closing women@ and
(b) s
On 16/07/2010 10:17, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The idea is to close the women@ list and/or or setup an autoresponder
that directs people to this list instead.
[ ] +1 let's dot it
+1
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The idea is to close the women@ list and/or or setup an autoresponder
that directs people to this list instead.
+1
Nick
+1 (non binding)
Tommaso
2010/7/16 Bertrand Delacretaz
> > [X ] +1 let's dot it
>
> -Bertrand (I meant "let's do it" of course ;-)
>
> [X ] +1 let's dot it
-Bertrand (I meant "let's do it" of course ;-)
