-1 (unbinding) because this vote, and the "dot it" slip, reminds me of a problem of relevance when "dotting the i's and crossing the t's" when framing any vote, so to speak
in this case, would suggest that there may be a significant difference between the options of: (a) closing women@ and (b) setting up an autoresponder agreeing to option (a) would mean that someone looking for the keyword "women@" in order to discuss an issue that he/she/they may initially feel fits into such a category, may not know to search for a "dev@" possibility instead, and so remain silence(d) on the other hand, agreeing to option (b) could help mitigate this circumstance but as the vote is currently construed, it is not possible to distinguish between options (a) and (b), and so a simple vote count at the end of this vote may miss the point personally, would like to keep a place for women@ if only for such aesthetic redirection for the time being at least ... On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > [X ] +1 let's dot it > > -Bertrand (I meant "let's do it" of course ;-) >
