Kinda strange that none of this involves site-dev@ which was the genesis of the
original site.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 13, 2015, at 3:44 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>
> If someone other than me could apply those patches, that'd sure be swell.
> This is (the future) projects.apache.org, not
Le vendredi 13 mars 2015 08:44:05 Daniel Gruno a écrit :
>
> If someone other than me could apply those patches, that'd sure be swell.
> This is (the future) projects.apache.org, not humbedooh.apache.org :(
>
+1
that's why I proposed to even join (and not only stay outside)
>
> As for keeping t
If someone other than me could apply those patches, that'd sure be swell.
This is (the future) projects.apache.org, not humbedooh.apache.org :(
As for keeping the old site around for a while, I suppose that's an
option, just don't expect infra to maintain it if it keels over ;)
With regards,
ping?
Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:49:23 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 13:32:26 Rich Bowen a écrit :
> > On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > > I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> > > projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality
Le mardi 10 mars 2015 13:32:26 Rich Bowen a écrit :
> On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> > projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
> > projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have
On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with this, pleas
On 2015-03-08 19:33, Hitesh Shah wrote:
Thanks for the info, Daniel. Updated. In terms of keeping project info updated,
is this info along with all the release info, etc. being pulled from the
project DOAP files? If not, do we still need to maintain them?
No, if/when projects.apache.org gets
Thanks for the info, Daniel. Updated. In terms of keeping project info updated,
is this info along with all the release info, etc. being pulled from the
project DOAP files? If not, do we still need to maintain them?
Do I need to do anything additional for it to show up in the listing on
https:
Le dimanche 8 mars 2015 13:13:32 Daniel Gruno a écrit :
> > CMS has staging, no?
> > And perhaps the site is tiny because there is no easy editing: chicken and
> > egg. IMHO, this new site has great graphics, but it really requires more
> > than graphics. And the CMS could be part of the solution t
On 2015-03-08 12:47, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le dimanche 8 mars 2015 11:28:22 Daniel Gruno a écrit :
- "Whereas the old pages were basic, the new ones have kind of an unusual
dark theme to them and look unpolished (vs. just plain as the old one)"
(copy/paste of another feedback that perfectly sum
Le dimanche 8 mars 2015 11:28:22 Daniel Gruno a écrit :
> > - "Whereas the old pages were basic, the new ones have kind of an unusual
> > dark theme to them and look unpolished (vs. just plain as the old one)"
> > (copy/paste of another feedback that perfectly summarised a feeling I
> > could not e
El vie., 6 de marzo de 2015 a las 23:40, Daniel Gruno ()
escribió:
>
>
> On 2015-03-06 23:39, Christopher wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru
>
(...)
> >> Similarly, are we still using DOAP files? I could imagine that there
> >> are others who were also referring to individu
On 2015-03-08 11:12, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
+0.5
I really like the graphics and general idea: that's for sure the way to go!
but before switching, there are some issues to fix, IMHO:
- "Whereas the old pages were basic, the new ones have kind of an unusual dark
theme to them and look unpolishe
+0.5
I really like the graphics and general idea: that's for sure the way to go!
but before switching, there are some issues to fix, IMHO:
- "Whereas the old pages were basic, the new ones have kind of an unusual dark
theme to them and look unpolished (vs. just plain as the old one)" (copy/past
+1
Antoine
On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
> has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you object
> to movin
On 03/06/2015 06:08 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
This is really cool stuff, but I want to make sure that our 160++
projects actually understand what's going on (and will take the
responsibility to keep their own info updated here), and that various
outsiders who come to the site to find our project
Hi Hitesh,
log onto https://projects-new.apache.org/edit/ and go to the bottom.
Pick 'tez' as the PMC and nothing as the sub-project name, click the
button and start typing :) That will create a tez.json file that the
site will then use.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-03-07 04:56, Hitesh Shah
Date: Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM
To: "dev@community.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
better job of auto filling the available horizontal space. Othe
From: Mike Drob
> > Reply-To: "dev@community.apache.org"
> > Date: Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM
> > To: "dev@community.apache.org"
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
> > projects-new.apache.org
> >
> > >Minor design nit:
Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM
> To: "dev@community.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org
>
> >Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
> >better job of auto filling the available h
Same question for Apache Tez. How do we need to fix the new website to show the
Tez project?
thanks
— Hitesh
On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> I can see the Apache UIMA entry in the "old" page, but it's not listed on the
> new page. What needs fixing?
>
> -Marshall Schor
>
e.org"
Date: Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM
To: "dev@community.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
>Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
>better job of auto filling the available hori
++
-Original Message-
From: Mike Drob
Reply-To: "dev@community.apache.org"
Date: Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM
To: "dev@community.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org
>Minor design nit: the content boxes sh
On 3/6/15 5:40 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>
> On 2015-03-06 23:39, Christopher wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
>>>
>>> The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
>>> people who ha
On 2015-03-06 23:39, Christopher wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
people who have linked to various parts of the site.
Similarly, are we still
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
>
> The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
> people who have linked to various parts of the site.
>
> Similarly, are we still using DOAP files? I could imagine
Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs?
The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few
people who have linked to various parts of the site.
Similarly, are we still using DOAP files? I could imagine that there
are others who were also referring to individual DOAPs
I can see the Apache UIMA entry in the "old" page, but it's not listed on the
new page. What needs fixing?
-Marshall Schor
On 3/6/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that p
Just happened to notice that the new website's header seems to be truncated
on mobile.
I use Chrome on Android..
http://imgur.com/8gZfu0i
On 6 Mar 2015 16:53, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the fu
Minor design nit: the content boxes should either be centered or do a
better job of auto filling the available horizontal space. Otherwise, it
looks spiffy, despite being fairly tiny on my monitor.
Would also like to see the releases page sort by date by default, and show
more than 10 entries. Thi
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org.
-0, do we need all these js/css/cookies from google(apis)?
I never had to disable noscript for anything than a.o on a.o until
then, whitelisting *.gg.c a
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
> has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you
> object to moving forward wi
+1
On 6 Mar 2015 17:53, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
> projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
> up. If you object to moving forward with thi
+1
On 2015-03-06 17:52, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has
> all the functionality that projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no
> reason to have two sites
> up. If you object to moving forward with th
+1, with two comments:
1. the projects page on the new site has a link to "Contributors", which is
broken.
2. there's some information linked on the old site about DOAP files and
RSS/Atom feeds, which do not exist (or are not obvious) on the new site.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.co
+1
Jacques
Le 06/03/2015 17:52, Rich Bowen a écrit :
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o has,
and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you object to moving forward with
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org
+1
-Bertrand
Yes please!
> On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
> has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you object
> to m
+1
On 06/03/15 17:52, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with this, please s
+1
Hadrian
On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that
projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites
up. If you object to moving forward with
+1
On 6 March 2015 at 17:57, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> +1 but clearly biased ;-)
>
>
> On 2015-03-06 17:54, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
>> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@
+ 1.
Suresh
> On Mar 6, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with
> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
> has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you object
> to
One of your mentors or the champion will have to do the edits for now.
We can always relax this to include committers, but for incubator that
would equal universal commit bit on this as well.
But I think that is not for this thread :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-03-06 18:14, Stian Soiland-Re
+1 - looks great!
..Apologies if this was explained before I joined this list - How does
this work for podlings? For the old site I was able to make a DOAP
file, but on the Apache Taverna entry on projects-new I am unable to
edit it as I am not in the Incubator PMC.
Can we still maintain the old
+1 but clearly biased ;-)
On 2015-03-06 17:54, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
+1
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replac
+1
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 8:53 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org
I'd like for us to go ahead and
46 matches
Mail list logo
