Kinda strange that none of this involves site-dev@ which was the genesis of the original site.
Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 13, 2015, at 3:44 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > > <grump> > If someone other than me could apply those patches, that'd sure be swell. > This is (the future) projects.apache.org, not humbedooh.apache.org :( > </grump> > > As for keeping the old site around for a while, I suppose that's an option, > just don't expect infra to maintain it if it keels over ;) > With regards, > Daniel. > >> On 2015-03-13 08:40, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >> ping? >> >> Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:49:23 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : >>> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 13:32:26 Rich Bowen a écrit : >>>> On 03/06/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: >>>>> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace projects.apache.org with >>>>> projects-new.apache.org. It now has all the functionality that >>>>> projects.a.o has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites >>>>> up. If you object to moving forward with this, please say so. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1, do it >>>>> [ ] +0, whatevs >>>>> [ ] -1, No (and say why, so we can address the problem) >>>> I'm going to call this a "yes" vote overall, with a few nits >>> +1 >>> >>> one more thing: when we switch projects-new to projects, it would be useful >>> to have old projects switched to projects-old, since there are still parts >>> that are useful or to be integrated to the new site (see Feeds, DOAP Files >>> and Documentation sections) >>> >>>> that have been addressed. >>> -1 I sent patches but they were not applied >>> >>>> Thank you all for your thoughts. Thanks, Daniel, for >>>> your work on this. And with all the folks that have said they'll get >>>> checkouts and hack on it, we should have much wonderment real soon. >>> Can I get commit access (without being PMC member)? >>> >>> I'd like to add an "about" folder equivalent to >>> https://projects.apache.org/references.html, and with a reference to >>> http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#comdev >>> >>> Notice: shouldn't comdev be added to projects-new as 6th "special >>> committee"? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Hervé >>> >>>> --Rich >
