Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-11-15 Thread Kay Schenk
On 11/14/2014 02:05 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> Two questions -- >> Are we ready to go ahead with these changes to /main/external_deps.lst -- > > No we aren't! Roberto sent us a proof of concept, but he wrote that even > the URL will change, so it is definitely not OK to ch

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-11-14 Thread Roger and Beth Whitcomb
Apache Pivot is another project that is using Apache Extras and are concerned about the policy change. I'm actually working on updates to the stuff we have there that may be in jeopardy (i.e., cannot push out my updates) until another solution is found Thanks, ~Roger Whitcomb On 11/14/14

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-11-14 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Kay Schenk wrote: Two questions -- Are we ready to go ahead with these changes to /main/external_deps.lst -- No we aren't! Roberto sent us a proof of concept, but he wrote that even the URL will change, so it is definitely not OK to change the location for Extras from Google Code to SourceFor

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-11-14 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 29/10/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote: > >> Here we go, the new look&feel based on some of your earlier feedback: >> http://sourceforge.net/directory/apache_extras >> > > This is much improved, thanks Roberto! The landing page is now much

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-30 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 29/10/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote: Here we go, the new look&feel based on some of your earlier feedback: http://sourceforge.net/directory/apache_extras This is much improved, thanks Roberto! The landing page is now much cleaner. Some of the comments on the inner pages still apply, but mayb

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-29 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2014-10-27 13:57 GMT+01:00 Roberto Galoppini : > > > 2014-10-23 8:20 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti : > >> On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote: >> >>> Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for >>> the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below. >>> Comme

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-27 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2014-10-23 8:20 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti : > On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote: > >> Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for >> the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below. >> Comments/Input welcome. >> https://sourceforge.net/directory/vert

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-23 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 23/10/2014 Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote: That's because dev@community is a Apache Software Foundation-wide mailing list, not an OpenOffice.org-specific one. And David did the right thing by e-mailing the dev@community list: Apache Extras is foundation-wide (not OpenOffice-specific) an

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-23 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 04:20:31 -0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote: This was sent to the dev@community list, but seeing the very limited feedback That's because dev@community is a Apache Software Foundation-wide mailing list, not an OpenOffice.org-specific one.

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-22 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote: Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below. Comments/Input welcome. https://sourceforge.net/directory/vertical:Apache-Extras/ This was sent to the dev@community li

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-10-01 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:18 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Luciano Resende > > wrote: > > > Great David, > > > > > >Does it make sense to have the right panel (Staff Picks, top > > downloads, > > > etc

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-09-30 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:18 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > > Great David, > > > >Does it make sense to have the right panel (Staff Picks, top > downloads, > > etc) be restricted to Apache Extras related projects ? I'll let others > > co

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-09-30 Thread David Nalley
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Great David, > >Does it make sense to have the right panel (Staff Picks, top downloads, > etc) be restricted to Apache Extras related projects ? I'll let others > comment on the adds portion of the prototype. Frankly, I don't know, or

Re: Apache Extras PoC

2014-09-30 Thread Luciano Resende
Great David, Does it make sense to have the right panel (Staff Picks, top downloads, etc) be restricted to Apache Extras related projects ? I'll let others comment on the adds portion of the prototype. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:44 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks: > > Roberto and others fr

Apache Extras PoC

2014-09-30 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks: Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below. Comments/Input welcome. https://sourceforge.net/directory/vertical:Apache-Extras/ --David