Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project

2012-06-25 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
+1 (non binding ) We need to try out with new approaches to build solid open source communities. Hope this program will beneficial for both students and ASF communities. Thanks ! On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project

2012-06-25 Thread Nóirín Plunkett
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the > DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also > unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a > full 72 hours for the same reason (m

Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project

2012-06-25 Thread Marcel Offermans
+1

Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project

2012-06-25 Thread Katherine Marsden
On [ X ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread

Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project

2012-06-25 Thread Suresh Marru
+ 1 (I believe non-binding) These may have great long term impact and education motivators for projects. Suresh On Jun 25, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the > DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is als

Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project

2012-06-25 Thread Rich Bowen
On Jun 25, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > [ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in > a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread +1 -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com Shosholoza

Re: [VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project

2012-06-25 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
> [X ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in > a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread -Bertrand

[VOTE] Participate in a GSoC like project

2012-06-25 Thread Ross Gardler
This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a full 72 hours for the same reason (minimum 36 hours, will push as late as I can). For this reason