On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 8:24 PM Matthew Sacks
wrote:
> If you think there’s snark in my reply, you’ve misinterpreted it as I’m
> dead serious. Instead of letting personal opinions on awards because of
> what sounds like a bad personal experience indicates to me the real
> benefit if the proposal
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 7:15 PM Matthew Sacks
wrote:
> Thanks for your input.
>
> “I don’t like it” is your only reason?
Hey Matthew,
Reread his objection, he provided his rationale beyond the way you’ve
characterized it.
If you’re familiar with motivations, it’s the difference between creating
-1... it's completely unnecessary (as the work could easily be done under the
CommDev banner) and gives the sense of "action" towards a cause without
actually solving any real problem. Ironically, I predict it will fracture the
community and have the effect of removing diversity of views on th
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote on 11/15/16 3:41 PM:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> ...
>> First, if you are not convinced, don't participate. All we ask is that
>> you don't actively prevent others from doing so. Go Sharan and
Hi Rich,
How much is the sponsorship for this? And, given the lack of external
sponsors, why don't we (ASF) just sponsor it given what a great
support/service it'd be to our projects and their communities?
Thanks,
--tim
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> As some of you know,
Howdy All,
Where does the source/code for projects.a.o live?
https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category
Thanks,
--tim
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Tim,
>
> It seems you're rather fond of it.
Huh? I'm not sure what "it" is or why you're making observations about
what I'm fond of.
> Quite the number of posters in this
> thread are particpating in either body, or both. I feel confident t
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Branko,
>
> I am confident that the existing project with bylaws, policies and/or
> standing rules formalised has had its share of discussions regarding
> applicability of elements therein.. And have resolved those. I guess that
> when such a
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>> ... I would say that given the multitude of external facilities available
>> outside of the ASF (Sourceforge, Github, etc) that it has reached the end
>> of its lifespan regarding
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 Vincent Keunen wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-01-06 19:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>>
>>> convenience binaries are not Apache Releases.
>>
>> Let's not forget OpenOffice and the likes. Having all users compile the
>> source code *ma
Hi Brane,
How about you don't be a jerk for your own "amusement"?
We ought to be safe to ask questions of one another without a
sarcastic donkey response... please.
Thanks,
--tim
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 12.08.2014 21:01, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
I'm still willing to help out and lurk over here...
--tim
On Thursday, October 10, 2013, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'm ex concom, but willing to help out.
>
> We should (imho) have one calendar. So whichever we decide on, we should
> redirect the other. The events hostname sounds most memorable.
>
> -
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Melissa Warnkin wrote:
> Hello, ComDev!!
>
> Following up on Rich's email from a few weeks back regarding the
> "Event-in-a-Box", I wanted to share with you all, as an FYI, what I have
> produced so far. The below list is my takeaway of what should be included in
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 2 March 2013 17:58, Tim Williams wrote:
>
>>
>> Wow, that's pretty awesome, I'd like for us to start participating in
>> this - these are tomorrow's committers:) What a great soft
>> intro
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> On 2 March 2013 10:37, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>>
>>> Quick sanity check: would it be worthwhile to explore having a non-code
>>> project?
>>
>>
>> Google have always, in the past, been agains
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Muhammad Asif wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am a good programmer and I also had SCJP 1.5 but unfortunately have not
> worked on Java for a long time.
>
> At the moment I want to know how can we use commons validator in a simple
> servlet or jsp application without any o
contributing to the software, you'll use the dev@ (e.g.
d...@commons.apache.org) address.
--tim
[1] - http://community.apache.org/
[2] - http://commons.apache.org/validator/mail-lists.html
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:21 A
--tim
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Ping jerenkrantz as he has given several such presos.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Tim Williams
>> To: dev@community.apache.org
>> Sent: Mon, August 2, 2010 5:43:47 PM
>> Subject
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 16:00, Isabel Drost wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Tim Williams
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I don't know if this topic has been discussed before or if I missed if
> its aready there. But before a few weeks I had to explain to my
> customer "what actually open source is". I have started to create some
> slides mys
hey Marsden
> wrote:
>> Tim Williams wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Kathey Marsden
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/12/7 Kathey Marsden :
&g
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Kathey Marsden
wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>> 2009/12/7 Kathey Marsden :
>>
>>>
>>> Jayaram Subramanian wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Thanks for the opportunity given to me for submitting my proposal. Also
as explained below i have subscribed myself to apa
22 matches
Mail list logo
