Well,
stating the obvious, I’ll add my +1 ;-)
And yes Craig, I said the defaults … if you have explicitly configured your
.asf.yaml subjects, they are left unchanged.
Chris
Von: Richard Zowalla
Datum: Mittwoch, 2. August 2023 um 08:10
An: dev@community.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [POLL] Should
+1
Am 2. August 2023 07:47:25 MESZ schrieb Jarek Potiuk :
>+1
>
>On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:15 AM Craig Russell wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christofer,
>>
>> As long as projects with their own settings can continue to use them, I'm
>>
>> +1
>>
>> to change the defaults for all projects. If the projects don't l
+1
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:15 AM Craig Russell wrote:
>
> Hi Christofer,
>
> As long as projects with their own settings can continue to use them, I'm
>
> +1
>
> to change the defaults for all projects. If the projects don't like being
> able to use their lists again, they can always go back to
Hi Christofer,
As long as projects with their own settings can continue to use them, I'm
+1
to change the defaults for all projects. If the projects don't like being able
to use their lists again, they can always go back to what they had before.
Thanks,
Craig
> On Aug 1, 2023, at 05:16, Chris
+1,
Looks Good!!!
-Ayush
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 19:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 3:29 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> > @Gary, see the date range in the URLs.
> > You might need to manually perform an empty search in those ranges.
>
> It seems those date ranges in the query str
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 3:29 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> @Gary, see the date range in the URLs.
> You might need to manually perform an empty search in those ranges.
It seems those date ranges in the query string are only taken into
account after a refresh.
Perhaps on first request, if you have no s
+1
@Christofer, thanks for taking care of this.
The improvement is undeniable.
@Gary, see the date range in the URLs.
You might need to manually perform an empty search in those ranges.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 2:16 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Starting a new thread as the last one sort of dried
Try this:
https://lists.apache.org/list?d...@streampipes.apache.org:dfr=2023-1-1|dto=2023-1-15:
Not sure why it didn’t work … if it doesn’t again, just select the date range
on that list from 01.01.2023 to 15.01.2023
Chris
Von: Gary Gregory
Datum: Dienstag, 1. August 2023 um 14:55
An: dev@com
+1 for making this change, it will make the mailinglists a lot more readable
for humans.
@Gary: For example you have multiple mails around a single PR that are not
consolidated into a single thread because the username of who commented is in
the subject.
Cheers,
Hans
On 1 Aug 2023 at 15:06 +
Hi.
Le mar. 1 août 2023 à 14:17, Christofer Dutz
a écrit :
>
> Starting a new thread as the last one sort of dried up and didn’t quite form
> anything actionable.
>
> Being subscribed to many of our mailing-lists and most recently looking into
> every project, dev-lists when reviewing board rep
I can't tell the difference between
https://lists.apache.org/list?d...@streampipes.apache.org:dfr=2023-1-9|dto=2023-1-15
and
https://lists.apache.org/list?d...@streampipes.apache.org:dfr=2023-6-12|dto=2023-6-18
They both use "[PR]". What am I missing?
Gary
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, 8:17 AM Christofe
+1 to making this change. It would immediately make our mailing lists
more consumable and welcoming to actual humans.
Coupled with a page explaining how this works (Oh! Look! There's
already one at
https://community.apache.org/contributors/mailing-lists.html ) this
would be a great service to our
Starting a new thread as the last one sort of dried up and didn’t quite form
anything actionable.
Being subscribed to many of our mailing-lists and most recently looking into
every project, dev-lists when reviewing board reports, I have seen many of our
lists literally being rendered useless.
13 matches
Mail list logo
