I totally agree Christopher and I thank you for acknowledging me because you
can easily get confused and lost with so many mailing list emails lol. I would
like to add in the friendliest manner, can the origination of the projects
followed by a small synopsis rehashing what some may have missed
Hi Dave,
Thank you very much ... highly appreciated
:-)
Chris
Am 08.05.19, 21:26 schrieb "Dave Fisher" :
Hi -
I’ve submitted INFRA-18350 Gitbox - Improve Generated Email Subjects
I’ve suggested a shorter, more consistent email subject. Threading is being
worked on slowl
Hi -
I’ve submitted INFRA-18350 Gitbox - Improve Generated Email Subjects
I’ve suggested a shorter, more consistent email subject. Threading is being
worked on slowly.
Regards,
Dave
> On May 8, 2019, at 7:15 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> I find it nearly impossible to follow GitHub (G
+1 from me as well, and I'll be at ApacheCon NA to help out. Are there
steps to take now, like asking in the projects to see which of your ideas
fits best? I would guess the BoF+hackathon between all the projects from
GSoD would be cool. Worst case, you have too many people writing docs in a
room..
I'm +1 [non-binding] for splitting D&I from ComDev off into it's own
committee/PMC/initiative/etc. It hasn't been done well under comdev and
it's time to give it a shot on it's own.
-KAM
On 5/8/2019 10:48 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote:
> FYI all:
>
> I'm going to call the vote on Friday morning (CET).
FYI all:
I'm going to call the vote on Friday morning (CET). If it passes, I'll
also add it to the board agenda at that time. I ask that everyone who
wants to participate do so by then.
Best Regards,
Myrle
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tim Williams wrote:
> -1... it's completely unnecessar
Hi -
I find it nearly impossible to follow GitHub (GitBox) emails. I know Infra has
done some work on threading these which has improved the situation. More needs
to be done to improve the subjects. Perhaps we can also create digest emails.
For JIRA I guess since I’ve used JIRA off and on since
-1... it's completely unnecessary (as the work could easily be done under the
CommDev banner) and gives the sense of "action" towards a cause without
actually solving any real problem. Ironically, I predict it will fracture the
community and have the effect of removing diversity of views on th
I too believe this to be part of ComDev's charter, but it is clear that we
have done little to address it since the formation of this PMC. So indeed
perhaps it is the time to try something new.
+1 to that something new although I remain ambivalent to what specific form
this committee/pmc/thingy s
Hi Lars,
I agree that Jira emails have been there for quite some time.
It seems as more projects are starting to discuss things in jira.
What I'm more referring to is that with the jira issues, it would be great if
the title of these emails could be stripped down drastically.
Could imagine the e
Christofer,
I have to agree, the projects I have been involved with are getting harder
to follow. Too much noise in the signal. However, I do not have any
constructive suggestions at this time.
I keep thinking there could be an app/tool that
but then I remember Claude's Law:"There is no f
Hi Chris,
I partially agree with you.
I agree with Github pull requests. They are hard to follow and hard to read
(and I don't only mean the mails but also on the site itself).
I disagree with the Jira mails though. I wouldn't really know how to
improve those and I like that the discussion is pa
Hi all,
I have noticed in a lot of projects I am involved in, that my active
participation has dropped with more and more communities shifting to discuss
things in jira and using github code reviews.
Usually I used the title of emails to decide on which discussions I should
follow … this worke
13 matches
Mail list logo
