Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

2017-03-28 Thread Pierre Smits
The segment (see below)t in the request for graduation to the board is a remnant of an idea that is brought forward by many project in incubation. > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache NAME PMC be and hereby is > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > encourage open development

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

2017-03-28 Thread Pierre Smits
In 2015 I asked a similar quiestion in this same forum. See [1]. I may shed some light. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a4095177b9630643c8957e91b1e1b977b521db170767eb17eccec9f7@1426899898@%3Cdev.community.apache.org%3E Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Schaefer
The downside to majority rule when it comes to personnel voting is that it can lead to a situation where a company having a majority on the pmc can increase their majority by voting in additional employees without the minority having any way to provide a check on that exercise of power. Yes thi

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

2017-03-28 Thread Joan Touzet
Shane said: > But the CouchDB ones look great - and it seems a number of projects > have > already copied them. IT would be a neat project to take those bylaws > and check them someplace as a "here's a sample set of bylaws to start > with" in Incubator land, so podlings have an example. I bet if

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

2017-03-28 Thread Shane Curcuru
Joan Touzet wrote on 3/28/17 8:34 PM: > Apache CouchDB does not allow vetos on new committer votes. > You can read our policy on all vote types here: > > https://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#types > > I encourage all other projects to make public a similar summary of > their guidelines. Thi

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

2017-03-28 Thread Joan Touzet
Apache CouchDB does not allow vetos on new committer votes. You can read our policy on all vote types here: https://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#types I encourage all other projects to make public a similar summary of their guidelines. This table alone has helped eliminate a LOT of confusio

Re: Vetoes for New Committers??

2017-03-28 Thread John D. Ament
I asked a similar question on another list some time back, around voting in new committers. I'm not going to share that thread (public vs private) but I think the advice i got from it was spot on. In addition, I've heard great additional feedback on other threads. Projects want committers who ar

Vetoes for New Committers??

2017-03-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Hi, on https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html#new-committer-process it describes the process of bringing in a new committer for a "typical project". But in the "Discussion" it speaks of "3 +1 and no vetoes"... Is it really "typical" that projects use vetoes for new committers? I can't reca

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
https://github.com/lucidworks/searchhub has all the crawlers/setup already setup for a number of ASF projects (email, Github, websites, wikis, Stack Overflow) and a pretty easy framework for specifying others (I looked at the FOAF stuff, but it wasn't consistent enough to automate). Lucidworks (my

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-28 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - I’ve got knowledge too and I also have some ideas I am thinking about. I also have some bandwidth now that I am going into job search mode. I think an important step is to think through what the taxonomy should be as that will help inform the common schema. Regards, Dave > On Mar 28, 201

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-28 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
Just to provide links: http://jirasearch.mikemccandless.com/search.py?index=jira - Lucene (not Solr) based search of issues for several projects. Very deep understanding of the domain. Adding more is probably not that hard. http://search-lucene.com/ - Solr-based, search over mailing lists, wikis, i

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-28 Thread Chris Mattmann
+1 I think that minimizing the requirement to run specific infrastructure, and trying to convince those already running such services I believe like Otis and Grant/others from Lucid are optimal choices. Cheers, Chris On 3/28/17, 12:19 PM, "Nick Burch" wrote: On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Shane

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-28 Thread Nick Burch
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Shane Curcuru wrote: As has been pondered many times (recently by Rich and Sally, among many others), it would be really nice to better help newcomers find the right information at the ASF or our projects. We have one of the industry's leading search tools right here: why ar

MAILING LIST

2017-03-28 Thread Suresh
How can i join mailing list of APACHE for GOOGLE SUMMER OF CODE

Re: Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-28 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
I am an Apache Solr committer and would be happy to be part of such project. My primary focus within Solr community is onboarding, training and general beginner-orientation. I would be happy to do Solr intro course to any Apache Solr committer and contribute to this project on Solr issues such as

Using Solr/Lucene to provide our own site search?

2017-03-28 Thread Shane Curcuru
As has been pondered many times (recently by Rich and Sally, among many others), it would be really nice to better help newcomers find the right information at the ASF or our projects. We have one of the industry's leading search tools right here: why aren't we using it, and even better, semi-cons