Re: Help with task: Make our event calendar less US centric

2016-09-29 Thread sebb
On 29 September 2016 at 00:03, martingronvall1 wrote: > > > It has to me allways been like I have my calender date, month,year the other > People can put if it to them Are normal but Who World put month, date, year > because then to me it is the same as putting my name Gronvall Martin and Who >

Re: Help with task: Make our event calendar less US centric

2016-09-29 Thread martingronvall1
It has to me allways been like I have my calender date, month,year the other People can put if it to them Are normal but Who World put month, date, year because then to me it is the same as putting my name Gronvall Martin and Who would ever write it like that to freindsĀ  Sendt fra Samsun

Re: Addition to the project maturity model

2016-09-29 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
"release artifacts"? Or does that hint to much of Maven? We can do it as two different requirements.. RE50 - independendly generate a source archive (RE10). RE60 - independently generate any convenience binaries (RE40) I'm not sure what is the deal with the BASIC line numbering idea of RE* - p

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-29 Thread Rich Bowen
On 09/28/2016 08:06 PM, Melissa Warnkin wrote: > Speaker notifications haven't gone out yet - so I was just informed from > Angela. Supposedly, they're going out tomorrow. Looks like the Big Data notifications might go out a little later than the ApacheCon Europe notifications. > > From

Re: Addition to the project maturity model

2016-09-29 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > After a discussion on the general@incubator.a.o mailing list [1], I'd > like to propose the following addition to the project maturity model. > > RE50 > The release process is documented and repeatable to the extent that > someone new

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-29 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Melissa Warnkin wrote: > Speaker notifications haven't gone out yet - so I was just informed from > Angela. Supposedly, they're going out tomorrow. > I had mine before I sent this note, but it's possible it was an incremental process. Thankfully, the follow-up n

Re: Addition to the project maturity model

2016-09-29 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On 28 September 2016 at 19:26, Joan Touzet wrote: > Big +1 here. Projects that can't be repeatably built risk decay > faster than those that can. +1 - as long as it is documented it doesn't matter if it says "copy the file three times while jumping high in the air". Obviously automated build/rel

Re: Apachecon reviewers

2016-09-29 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 09/29/2016 02:06 AM, Melissa Warnkin wrote: > Speaker notifications haven't gone out yet - so I was just informed from > Angela. Supposedly, they're going out tomorrow. I have received mines (first one ~ 2 hours after your email) They were in the google mail spam folder ;-) Cheers Jean-Fred