Sure, this should be on our web site, thanks Bertrand for writing this maturity
model.
Antoine
On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to everybody who contributed, I think
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApacheProjectMaturityModel is ready
> for prime time
Hi,
Sorry -1 binding due to LICENSE/NOTICE issues, locale issue and the RSL issue
I checked (on OSX):
- md5 and signatures correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE have issues ( see below)
- No unexpected binaries in source
- All source files have Apache headers
- Can compile from source
- Can create a usa
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 01/07/2015 04:43 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>
>> I think we also need to discuss whether we expect projects to undertake
>> self-evaluation and reflection, or whether we'd have a process of review
>> involving peers, mentors, shepherds etc.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...No a real issue either way, just pointing out it might hinder adoption
> outside of Apache...
Right - people are free to pick and choose anyway, outside of Apache.
-Bertrand
Hi,
> "for distribution to the public at no charge" is straight from the
> from the ASF Bylaws at http://apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html so I'm
> not keen on changing that.
Understand. No a real issue either way, just pointing out it might hinder
adoption outside of Apache.
Thanks,
Justin
+1
Concerning CD10, I think the language of the statement is correct, but the
footnote is not helpful, even though also correct.
I think the problem might be context. For the footnote, try, "It is ASF policy
that all software created and maintained by an Apache Project is available from
the p
Hi,
Thanks to everybody who contributed, I think
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApacheProjectMaturityModel is ready
for prime time, as a first version that might still evolve.
(except maybe Justin's comments about CD10, let's see how you like the
current wording)
I suggest moving it under htt
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Lefty Leverenz wrote:
> Some trivial edits...
Thanks very much! Trivial edits give one that warm fuzzy feeling that
the content is generally ok ;-)
-Bertrand
Hi Justin,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...Perhaps change CD10 to this?
> The project produces royalty free Open Source software
"for distribution to the public at no charge" is straight from the
from the ASF Bylaws at http://apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html so I'
