Some trivial edits:
LC10
The code is released under the Apache License, version 2.0 <*needs
terminal period*>
QU20
The projects puts a very high priority on producing secure software.
<"project puts">
*Consensus building* <"Consensus *B*uilding" to match init caps on
"License and Copy
Hi,
> I thought that was part of the Open Source definition?
Not quite (AFAIK), there's no royalties allowed on redistribution but that
doesn't mean you can't charge for it either initially or when redistributing it
as part of a bundle.
"The license shall not restrict any party from selling or
On 16.01.2015 00:40, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some (very) minor things.
>
> CD10 - "distributed at no charge to the public." while this may be true at
> Apache it doesn't have to be the case. 3rd parties wanting to this model may
> find this a stumbling block.
I thought that was part of th
On Friday, January 16, 2015, Dan Haywood
wrote:
> On 16 January 2015 at 17:51, Alex Harui >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hope you like it.
> >
>
> I like it. A lot. And laugh-out loud funny (well, I thought, anyway).
>
> I'm imagining everyone attending a barcamp or ApacheCon solemnly standing
> up and re
On 16 January 2015 at 17:51, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Hope you like it.
>
I like it. A lot. And laugh-out loud funny (well, I thought, anyway).
I'm imagining everyone attending a barcamp or ApacheCon solemnly standing
up and repeating that oath...
Good job, +1
Dan
> -Alex
>
> The Committer
I think Bertrand’s document is coming along nicely.
This is half serious and half for fun, but while it will be great to have
a maturity model and top-level authoritative documents on the Apache Way,
to me, what would also help is a way to make important things memorizable.
I sure hope I don’t ha
