Hey Norman,
have you prepared a draft of the application already? Can we put this up
somewhere for
review/amending? In case you want to add me to the list of co-admins, my
melange link_id is uli.
Uli
On 01.03.2011 20:10, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I plan to submit the application fo
I would be in favor to just use "gsoc2011" as label and ignore the rest.
Bye,
Norman
2011/3/3 Ulrich Stärk
> +1 for using JIRA labels and creating a filter. I can do that.
>
> There are loads of issues labeled with just "gsoc": [1]. Some of those have
> GSoC 2010 in their
> title, some just GSo
Indeed ;)
On 03.03.2011 20:21, Noirin Shirley wrote:
> Excellent :-) Please ask your chair to mention the ASF as a ... I'm
> not sure what they're calling it?
>
> In return, you'll be expected to "mentor the mentors" a little bit, be
> available if they have questions (you can bring them back her
This mailing list? I am not a dev or prog person! Thank you!
And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than
the risk it took to blossom. -Anais Nin
+1 for using JIRA labels and creating a filter. I can do that.
There are loads of issues labeled with just "gsoc": [1]. Some of those have
GSoC 2010 in their
title, some just GSoC, some none of these. These most likely are from the last
year(s) and we need
to decide whether just to reuse them, c
Excellent :-) Please ask your chair to mention the ASF as a ... I'm
not sure what they're calling it?
In return, you'll be expected to "mentor the mentors" a little bit, be
available if they have questions (you can bring them back here if you
don't know the answers), etc. If it's a research projec
Then I'd shamelessly like to add my chair's research project Saros [1],[2] to
that list ;). Saros is
an Eclipse plugin to add collaborative editing features (and others) to Eclipse.
Uli
[1] http://www.saros-project.org/
[2] http://dpp.sf.net/
On 03.03.2011 19:30, Noirin Shirley wrote:
> Yep, it
Yep, it sure does! It could be anything from three people with some
code on Google Project Hosting, to a full-blown incorporated
non-profit whatever :-) And yes, it should be someone who's
preparing/willing to apply :-)
Noirin
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Does that inclu
[X ] +1 grant commit rights to ComDev site directory to all committers
On 3/3/2011 9:05 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi there,
this email is mostly for the co-admins. How you guys thing it makes
most sense to manage tasks for GSOC. JIRA 4.x has labels build in so I
think we should just use them.
+1 to using Jira labels. Should it be the gsoc2011 label?
right now ther
Hi there,
this email is mostly for the co-admins. How you guys thing it makes
most sense to manage tasks for GSOC. JIRA 4.x has labels build in so I
think we should just use them. For projects that use Bugzilla I
suggest we go the way Ross told us todo. So just ask them to create
the tasks in JIRA
As far as I understood it help to get new orgs/projects into GSOC. So
for example some project which is hosted on sourceforge or something
like that.
Bye,
Norman
2011/3/3 Ulrich Stärk :
> Does that include small projects that haven't participated before but are
> already preparing to apply
> for
On 3/3/2011 6:50 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
[X ] +1 grant commit rights to ComDev site directory to all committers
[X ] +1 grant commit rights to ComDev site directory to all committers
-Bertrand
On 03/03/2011 03:50 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
[X] +1 grant commit rights to ComDev site directory to all committers
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
+1 grant commit rights to ComDev site directory to all committers
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
btw, whats ml are using? I would like to subscribe, if possible
For retreats, it's normally concom@ and retreats@. For barcamps,
generally it's concom@ for the initial proposal, then an event specific
one for the organising.
Nick
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Ross Gardler wrote:
In my opinion anyone who has commit access to one or more ASF projects
should also be allowed to commit to our site. Publication will be
limited to ComDev PMC members. Joe has confirmed in a previous thread
that this is possible.
I'm +1 - grant commit r
Thanks Uli and Ross,
Antoine
On 3/3/2011 10:09 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
I guess the first step would be to identify issues and somehow tag/label them.
I'm not a Bugzilla
user, can you tag/label issues and create a bookmarkable search for issues with
theses tags/labels
in Bugzilla?
code-awar
On 03/03/2011 15:09, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
I guess the first step would be to identify issues and somehow tag/label them.
I'm not a Bugzilla
user, can you tag/label issues and create a bookmarkable search for issues with
theses tags/labels
in Bugzilla?
-1 on using bugzilla for the reasons given
I guess the first step would be to identify issues and somehow tag/label them.
I'm not a Bugzilla
user, can you tag/label issues and create a bookmarkable search for issues with
theses tags/labels
in Bugzilla?
code-awards is a private, committers-only list. Subscription is via
code-awards-subscr
On 03/03/2011 14:54, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
What are the steps to offer two GSOC projects for Ant ? Can we enter our
GSOC issues in bugzilla ?
This has yet to be defined by this years admin team. However, based on
previous years you will not be able to use bugzilla since we need to be
ab
On 3/3/2011 9:52 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Blast, I just realised the email subject is too broad.
For clarity, as the text of this vote says, we are talking about
opening commit access to the site directory only, not the whole of our
SVN tree.
+1 grant commit rights to ComDev site directory to
What are the steps to offer two GSOC projects for Ant ? Can we enter our
GSOC issues in bugzilla ?
Is the code-awards list archived somewhere ? I did not see on
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/
What is the subscription email address for code-awards ?
Regards,
Antoine
On 3/3/2011 9
Blast, I just realised the email subject is too broad.
For clarity, as the text of this vote says, we are talking about opening
commit access to the site directory only, not the whole of our SVN tree.
On 03/03/2011 14:50, Ross Gardler wrote:
Recently we moved to the CMS for our website. One o
Recently we moved to the CMS for our website. One of the side effects of
this is that we have to grant commit access to allow people to edit the
site.
Technically this means we need to take a vote before any edits can be
made. This is not a very good idea in my opinion. We should be
encouragi
Thanks Uli.
Bye
Norman
2011/3/3, Ulrich Stärk :
> I just updated the timeline at http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html for
> GSoC 2011. Our own
> deadlines have yet to be added.
>
> Uli
>
> Right now we are using a mailing list hosted by Isabel Drost. Not everyone
> has a XING account,
> though, so a mailing list might be better suited. Or is there a way to hook
> up a mailing list with a
> XING group?
No, no way to combine this. Guess it will get more visibility through
such a g
On 03/03/2011 14:34, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Are you using XING or similar to announce/organize the event? If a
XING group is used, people can follow (like me). And probably other
events like a bavaria barcamp could join teh group too
I've copied this to ConCom as it's not our responsibility
I just updated the timeline at http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html for GSoC
2011. Our own
deadlines have yet to be added.
Uli
Right now we are using a mailing list hosted by Isabel Drost. Not everyone has
a XING account,
though, so a mailing list might be better suited. Or is there a way to hook up
a mailing list with a
XING group?
Uli
On 03.03.2011 15:34, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Are you using XING or similar to
> Can you get either 3 apache committers, or 2 apache committers + 2 others to
> agree to help run a one day BarCamp in Bavaria? (BarCamps are probably
> easier and cheaper to put on than Retreats)
Hm why not? I will see if I can find some other interested people from
the south. For sure it would
Are you using XING or similar to announce/organize the event? If a
XING group is used, people can follow (like me). And probably other
events like a bavaria barcamp could join teh group too
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> We are doing something like this in Berlin already: e
Thanks Joe,
That's easy enough. I'll take it from here.
Ross
On 03/03/2011 14:32, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Index: asf-authorization-template
===
--- asf-authorization-template(revision 786417)
+++ asf-authorization-template(wor
Index: asf-authorization-template
===
--- asf-authorization-template(revision 786417)
+++ asf-authorization-template(working copy)
@@ -450,6 +450,9 @@
[/comdev]
@comdev= rw
+[/comdev/site]
+@committers = rw
+
[/committers]
On 03/03/2011 14:24, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Why not manage the site the way the www site is managed and
open up commit access to all committers? You can restrict
actual publication to comdev folks.
That sounds like a great suggestion.
How do I make that happen?
Once I understand the process I'l
Why not manage the site the way the www site is managed and
open up commit access to all committers? You can restrict
actual publication to comdev folks.
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 9:18:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Commit
OK, technically we need to vote for this. I didn't think about this
limitation when we moved from Confluence to the CMS.
However, I don't think we need to worry about it since we don't do
releases of code in this project.
I'll add you and call the vote. If anyone should object then I'll remov
On 03/03/2011 13:54, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I feel simliar to Benson. Ireland is very nice, but it has a very high
cost on time.
I just took a look at the committers map. Wasn't there an effort
before to bring together Apache people (and interested) in a specific
area? 10 people from bavaria
On 03/03/2011 13:45, Benson Margulies wrote:
Well, thing #1, I missed the weekend aspect. So I'm effectively 50% nuts.
I'd put it much higher than that having met you ;-)
Ross
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
10 people from bavaria can make it in one day to an event and back. Cost
should be very low. Of course not the same as a big meet'n'greet in
ireland, but it might help people coming into apache or finally meet at
least the people near you. From bav
We are doing something like this in Berlin already: every month or so we meet
for an Apache Dinner.
Usually there are 2-4 members, 6 or so committers and a few guests, all from
the area.
Uli
On 03.03.2011 14:54, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I feel simliar to Benson. Ireland is very nice, but it
I feel simliar to Benson. Ireland is very nice, but it has a very high
cost on time.
I just took a look at the committers map. Wasn't there an effort
before to bring together Apache people (and interested) in a specific
area? 10 people from bavaria can make it in one day to an event and
back. Cost
I have interest, but I have a very, very, strong priority toward
family on free time, and it's not so easy to transport the skating
competitions, piano lessons, and other family weekend activities to
Ireland. Aide from the fact that, as part of that priority, I tend to
want to spend the time with t
Well, thing #1, I missed the weekend aspect. So I'm effectively 50% nuts.
I mean 'selection' in the 'self-selection' sense of the term.
I confess that I don't have a suggestion. I wish I'd started by asking
about who turns up. A few days ago, we had a load of anti-corporate
messages on the incuba
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Benson Margulies wrote:
To me, however, the issue is the *time*, not the money. If I use
vacation time for such a thing, I'm going to get some pretty hairy
eyeballs across the dining room table from the my spouse and kids. If I
use work time, I have to justify the time, and
On 03/03/2011 13:30, Benson Margulies wrote:
I'm a little puzzled by the retreats.
Retreats are managed by ConCom not by ComDev. Having said that I don't
see any harm on this discussion here, just be aware that we are
discussing in a broader space and should feed back any conclusions to
ConC
uli
On 03.03.2011 14:33, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 13:15, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> I just wanted to update the GSoC page with the 2011 timeline but I don't
>> have commit karma. Can
>> someone please grant it to me?
>
> What is you availid?
>
> Ross
On 03/03/2011 13:15, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
I just wanted to update the GSoC page with the 2011 timeline but I don't have
commit karma. Can
someone please grant it to me?
What is you availid?
Ross
I'm a little puzzled by the retreats. On the one hand, the members and
incubator lists have a constant stream of commentary of one snarkiness
or another about our focus on individuals, rather than corporations.
Then we have the retreats, which to me seem to select people with very
strong corporate
I just wanted to update the GSoC page with the 2011 timeline but I don't have
commit karma. Can
someone please grant it to me?
Thanks,
Uli
Does that include small projects that haven't participated before but are
already preparing to apply
for this year?
Uli
On 01.03.2011 20:15, Noirin Shirley wrote:
> Before we finally submit the application...
>
> It's my understanding that it now has one new question: do we know of
> any small/
52 matches
Mail list logo
