Thanks Joe,

That's easy enough. I'll take it from here.

Ross

On 03/03/2011 14:32, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Index: asf-authorization-template
===================================================================
--- asf-authorization-template    (revision 786417)
+++ asf-authorization-template    (working copy)
@@ -450,6 +450,9 @@
  [/comdev]
  @comdev= rw

+[/comdev/site]
+@committers = rw
+
  [/committers]
  @committers  = rw
  @svnadmins = rw




----- Original Message ----
From: Ross Gardler<rgard...@apache.org>
To: dev@community.apache.org
Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 9:29:52 AM
Subject: Re: Commit karma

On 03/03/2011 14:24, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Why not manage the site the way  the www site is managed and
open up commit access to all  committers?  You can restrict
actual publication to comdev  folks.

That sounds like a great suggestion.

How do I make that  happen?

Once I understand the process I'll propose it to this list and  implement
(assuming it is  approved).

Ross




----- Original  Message ----
From: Ross Gardler<rgard...@apache.org>
To: dev@community.apache.org
  Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 9:18:05 AM
Subject: Re: Commit  karma

OK, technically we need to vote for this. I didn't  think about this
limitation
when we moved from Confluence to the  CMS.

However, I don't think we need  to worry about  it since we don't do
releases of
code in this   project.

I'll add you and call the vote. If anyone  should object then  I'll remove
you
and review all commits  myself.

Once that cycle is out of  the way I'll  start a discussion to put an
approved
process in   place.

Ross

On 03/03/2011 13:41,  Ulrich Stärk wrote:
   uli

  On 03.03.2011 14:33, Ross Gardler wrote:
On  03/03/2011  13:15, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
I just wanted to update   the GSoC page with the 2011 timeline but I
don't
have commit  karma.  Can
someone please grant it to  me?

What  is you  availid?

  Ross


-- rgard...@apache.org
  @rgardler






--
rgard...@apache.org
@rgardler






--
rgard...@apache.org
@rgardler

Reply via email to