Hi All
I was looking to ArrayUtils(version 3.4) to hopefully find a swap method .
Is this some thing available else where or can i implement one. please
suggest.
Also i am not sure which commons lib this can be placed with. please let
know about that as well.
thanks
venkat.
nk such a feature belongs to the ArrayUtils class in lang.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:08 AM, venkatesha murthy <
> venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > I was looking to ArrayUtils(version 3.4) to hopefully find a swap method
>
Do we know if lombok is supported on all flavours of java for instance IBM
JDK, Open JDK , java 8 etc...
Was just thinking of the future proof readiness.
Iam absolutely interested in lombok and even today use it for most demo
purposes and have been stressing for its use where Oracle JDK is the
pr
Please help.
thanks
venkat.
Hi All,
The existing Percentile class calculates the percentile based on the
quantile position of the array fixed as
p * (N+1)/100 for a pth Percentile on an Array of size N. However if we
were to add these numbers in MS Excel
to calculate the percentile it provides a different result and closely
:26 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 5/21/14, 12:18 PM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> The existing Percentile class calculates the percentile based on
> >>> the
> >>> quantile position of the array fixed as
>
computation. kth selection, pivoting can be futher encapsulated as
nested classes and be used within EstimationTecnhique Enum.
I have updated the bug 1120 along with a patch for more details. Please let
know your opinions.
Thanks
Venkat.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:53 AM, venkatesha murthy <
venkateshamu
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:03:57 +0800 (SGT), venkatesha m wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am looking for opinion on the name of the enum for the various
>> estimation strategies.
>> This is a public static enum under Percentile and i wish to call it
>> Est
All comments are incorporated except for type 10 of wkipedia as i couldnt
get a comparing tool to provide.
I have also added min and maxLimits to javadoc.
Please let know.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:27 PM, venkatesha murthy <
venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Ju
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> Le 18/06/2014 20:28, venkatesha m a écrit :
> > Hi Luc, Gilles
>
> Hi Venkat
>
> >
> > First of, Iam immensly thankful to all your comments on this patch.
> > Next, i am attaching my new patch with today's date(18-jun). However
> > please a
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:41 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>
>> On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still using it is certainly
I am adding a canEqual method in MathUtils since neither Math.equals nor
Precision.equalsIncludingNaN performs better under heavy load (I have
attached the test code for the same in the patch).
The reason as far as i can think is :
In case of equals it keeps churning new objects and makes Double.
I am adding the following 2 methods in MathArrays. Please let me know
if any one has concerns.(The math-1130-remove.patch and
math-1130-replace.patch has te code for reference)
a) Replace a old val with new val in a double array
i) public static double[] replaceInRange(final double[] values,final
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While looking further in Percentile class for MATH-1120, I have found
> another problem in the current implementation. NaNStrategy.FIXED should
> leave the NaNs in place, but at the end of the KthSelector.select
> method, a call
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:06:16 +0530, venkatesha murthy wrote:
>>
>> I am adding a canEqual method in MathUtils since neither Math.equals nor
>>
>> Precision.equalsIncludingNaN performs better under hea
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:36 AM, venkatesha murthy
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Gilles wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:06:16 +0530, venkatesha murthy wrote:
>>>
>>> I am adding a canEqual meth
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
>
> Le 23/06/2014 21:08, venkatesha murthy a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> While looking further in Percentile class for
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:35 AM, venkatesha murthy <
venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
Can i put a patch for this change?
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Luc Maisonobe
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Venkat,
>>
>> Le 23/06/2014 21:08, venkatesha murthy a écrit :
&
The Percentile actually uses KthSelector logic and is dependent on only
KthSelector
however the variability part is pivoting strategy.
Given that both KthSelector and Pivoting are independent we could make them
as utility classes or may be functions with in MathUtils with exposed
interfaces.
Here
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> [...]
>
>
> The change i am bringing in is simple in that in any case of either of
> them nan or both then return true or false and if and only if both are
> *not nan* then get to Precision.equals
>
> Does any o
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 25/06/2014 06:10, venkatesha murthy a écrit :
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:35 AM, venkatesha murthy <
> > venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can i put a patch for this change?
>
> I think we
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
>
> Le 25/06/2014 06:21, venkatesha murthy a écrit :
> > The Percentile actually uses KthSelector logic and is dependent on only
> > KthSelector
> > however the variability part is pivoting strate
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:39 AM, venkatesha murthy <
venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Luc Maisonobe
> wrote:
>
>> Le 25/06/2014 06:10, venkatesha murthy a écrit :
>> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:35 AM, v
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/25/14, 12:12 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> > Le 25/06/2014 06:05, venkatesha murthy a écrit :
> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Luc Maisonobe
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Venkat,
> >>>
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/29/14, 9:48 AM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/25/14, 12:12 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> >>> Le 25/06/2014 06:05, venkatesha murth
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:39:51 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 6/29/14, 2:30 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 10:25:58 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/29/14, 9:48 AM, venkatesha
math (such as
perhaps DoubleArray)
c) just to retain these as private static within which ever main class
wanted it
Please let know your opinion on these.
thanks
venkat.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:19 AM, venkatesha murthy <
venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am adding the fo
Could some one respond please
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 8:06 PM, venkatesha m
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, 28 June 2014 12:08 AM, venkatesha murthy <
> venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Luc Maisonobe
> wrote:
&g
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
>
> Le 09/07/2014 18:56, venkatesha murthy a écrit :
> > Could some one respond please
>
>
> I'll have a look at this probably on Sunday.
> We are all volunteer, so there may be some delay for ac
Hi
I would like to know when is 3.4 math is scheduled for the release
Please let me know.
thanks
murthy
I see that this class and other SynchronizedSummaryStatistic class is using
old style synchronized which synchronizes both reads and writes...so was
wondering if we should switch to locks for better concurrency on reads
Does any one have a concern if i make this change
-Murthy
Hi Phil,
Though i did not add to StatisticalSummary i was actually working on a
DescriptiveStatisticalSummary for all the Storeless variants inclusive of
PSquarePercentile. Would it help if you can actually implement
SummaryStatisitcs with an extended interface such as
DescriptiveStatisticalSummar
, venkatesha murthy <
venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Though i did not add to StatisticalSummary i was actually working on a
> DescriptiveStatisticalSummary for all the Storeless variants inclusive of
> PSquarePercentile. Would it help if you can actually implemen
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/13/14 1:04 PM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
> > Adding a bit more on this:
> > a) The DescriptiveStatisticalSummary actually handles the rest of the
> > functions such as addValue, getPercentile etc.
> > b) I hav
AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/13/14 8:55 PM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/13/14 1:04 PM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
> >>> Adding a bit more on this:
> >>> a) The Descriptive
Many Thanks Phil, for answering all my questions.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/14/14 6:59 AM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
> > ok.
> >
> > Wanted to understand advantage of having a container class for all
> > storeless stats (just
Hi All
(Not sure if this is already discussed;)
The source repository link still points to svn. Perhaps this can point to
latest git link and then may be another old repo link can be given to
svn(for read only)
Next the Latest API Docs still takes us to 3.3 where as Last Published
version is 3.4-
Does a custom annotation at a class level say
@AccessLevel(default=PRIVATE/PROTECTED, final=true/false) that applies to
all the variables declared help reduce the clutter. With this; only few
variables may really require the non-final characteristics. May be a
@NonFinal annotation can help their to
38 matches
Mail list logo
