Re: svn commit: r1859859 [1/5] - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/access/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/admin/ m

On 24.05.19 12:33, Gary Gregory wrote: > -1 > > We are now on gitbox https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-jcs.git > When did that happen? I don't remember an announcement or a vote. Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: svn commit: r1859859 [1/5] - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/access/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/admin/ m

On 26.05.19 15:54, sebb wrote: > Jan 2019 > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053bb8f18e90800d918956f69364167b23c0cdca175568300b1108f6@%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E Ok, I missed that one completely. What do I have to do? Bye, Thomas -

Re: svn commit: r1859859 [1/5] - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/access/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs/admin/ m

On 27.05.19 10:21, sebb wrote: > Either re-apply each of the commits in turn to Git. Done. Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [CONFIGURATION] Formatting braces

On 11.09.19 15:53, Gary Gregory wrote: > public static final ConfigurationConsumer > DEFAULT_INCLUDE_LISTENER = e -> { throw e; }; > > public static final ConfigurationConsumer > NOOP_INCLUDE_LISTENER = e -> { /* noop */ }; +1 for these. > I propose a reformatting to use the "{ on the sa

Re: [all] Thoughts on build system maven -> gradle??

On 17.07.20 10:13, Claude Warren wrote: > -1 from me. I have a philosophical objection. Same here: -1 > Much like HTTP's mod_rewrite[1] gradle's greatest strength is that it > allows the developer to do so much in so many ways. But its greatest > weakness is that it allows the developer to do s

Re: svn commit: r1369332 - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/src/test/org/apache/jcs: ./ auxiliary/disk/block/ auxiliary/disk/file/ auxiliary/disk/indexed/ auxiliary/disk/jdbc/ auxiliary/disk/jdbc/mysql/ a

On 06.08.12 00:12, sebb wrote: > On 4 August 2012 15:23, wrote: >> Author: tv >> Date: Sat Aug 4 14:23:36 2012 >> New Revision: 1369332 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1369332&view=rev >> Log: >> - Fixed lots of warnings and FindBugs issues >> - Introduced carefully crafted @Suppress

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons as Sponsor for BeanShell in Incubator

On 09.10.12 15:12, Simone Tripodi wrote: > So, I'm here to call for a vote for Commons PMC be the BeanShell > Sponsor, please cast your votes > > [X] +1 Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org F

Re: [all] moving to svnpubsub or CMS?

On 14.11.2012 08:40, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Please, could someone who knows what to do step up? Just a quick note that sites created by Maven can be published with svnpubsub using the SCM Publish Maven Plugin (http://maven.apache.org/sandbox/plugins/asf-svnpubsub-plugin/). I guess this may ke

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.0 based on RC1

This has been a major overhaul of JCS with many adjustments for JDK 8+, better concurrency and logging. Finally, I would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.0. Apache Commons JCS 3.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/3.0-RC1 (svn revision 409

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.0 based on RC1

On 17.08.20 08:29, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe,

REMINDER: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.0 based on RC1

Could I please ask for one more PMC vote? TIA Bye, Thomas On 17.08.20 08:29, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > This has been a major overhaul of JCS with many adjustments for JDK 8+, > better concurrency and logging. Finally, I would like to > release Apache Commons JCS 3.0. [...] > Pleas

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.0 based on RC1

On 17.08.20 08:29, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > This has been a major overhaul of JCS with many adjustments for JDK 8+, > better concurrency and logging. Finally, I would like to > release Apache Commons JCS 3.0. More than 72 hours have now passed, and there have been the following votes (in

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons JCS 3.0 Released

The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the availability of Apache Commons JCS 3.0 Apache Commons JCS is a distributed, versatile caching system. This has been a major overhaul of JCS with many adjustments for JDK 8+, better concurrency and logging. Commons JCS 3.0 requires Java 8 or late

Re: [All] New repo for all proper components as submodules?

On 30.08.20 00:52, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All, Any thoughts for or against creating a new git repository which would contain all 'proper' Commons components as git submodules? The idea is to be able to checkout all of Commons 'proper' in one go in one place. I understand this is in addition t

Re: [commons-jcs] branch master updated: Use for-each. Use final. Remove redundant modifiers.

Hi Gary, On 21.11.20 19:22, ggreg...@apache.org wrote: This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. ggregory pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-jcs.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by thi

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

1_RC1/site/commons-jcs3-core/rat-report.html KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now. [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

Yeah, sorry - typo. > Am 23.12.2021 um 19:20 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > The Git tag commons-jcs3-3.1-rc1 commit for this RC is > f370adb43aeef51a5456d93f13f2601f3b87c44a which you can browse here: > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

My vote: > Am 23.12.2021 um 19:20 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Bye, Thomas --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

Hi Bruno. > Am 24.12.2021 um 02:00 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita > : > > [ERROR] SerializerUnitTest.testReadWrite:116 [key:0] should not be null, > Region Name = blockRegion2 Can you reproduce the failure (because I can't)? Some of the concurrent tests are timing sensitive. If you can reproduc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

> Am 28.12.2021 um 13:01 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita > : > > `mvn clean test install site` took a few minutes, but it just finished > running. Below the error that just happened again on my environment (appears > to be consistent for me): > > [INFO] Results: > [INFO] > [ERROR] Failures: > [ER

Re: can we get rid of dependabot?

+1 Thank you, Phil. This thing is a P.I.T.A. > Am 28.12.2021 um 19:20 schrieb Phil Steitz : > > I can no longer effectively monitor commits@ due to the spam generated by > this tool. I am afraid my eyeballs aren't the only ones going missing here > and that is a problem much more severe than a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

> Am 29.12.2021 um 16:06 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Is this test failure being addressed? Well, "addressed" is a big word for what I'm currently trying. "looked at" is closer to what happens. Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-ma

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on RC1

> Am 23.12.2021 um 19:20 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons JCS 3.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons JCS 3.1. Thanks to Bruno we were able to fin

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

er that 72 hours from now. [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Thank you, Thomas Vandahl (tv), Release Manager (using key 88817402)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

> Am 03.01.2022 um 18:24 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons JCS 3.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons JCS 3.1. > > [X] +1 Release these

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

Hi Bruno, > Am 05.01.2022 um 06:41 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita > : > > I didn't have much time, so inspected only one file, randomly selected, from > the dist area. The src zip. @Thomas, I think the NOTICE has the date 2020? I > think that can be fixed later? Everything else looks OK in that fi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

Hi Bruno, > Am 05.01.2022 um 21:59 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita > : > > Did you have an old NOTICE file in the directory where you built the jcs > release? I read the release instructions [1] and the code of > commons-release-plugin [2], and found nothing that appeared to replace files > or dat

[all] project.build.outputTimestamp set in org.apache:apache, was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

Hi folks, This may be of general interest, at least I had no idea about the consequences. So I thought I’d share the result of my research. > Am 06.01.2022 um 10:30 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > >> Maybe somebody else knows how that can happen. > The effective POM shows the followin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

Hi folks, could I please have one more PMC vote? If you think that the outputTimestamp issue must be fixed before, then please vote -1 explicitly. Bye, Thomas > Am 03.01.2022 um 18:24 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

Hi Gilles, > Am 14.01.2022 um 15:37 schrieb Gilles Sadowski : > >>> Maven artifacts are here: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1576/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs3/3.1/ > > I only see one ".pom" file and one ".xml" file (with their respective > crypt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

Hi Gilles, > Am 17.01.2022 um 14:11 schrieb Gilles Sadowski : > > No; the remark is for making the reviewer's life easier, i.e just copy/paste > the command and see the build succeed. Without the environment variable, > the "javadoc" step fails IIRC. Ok, thanks for the hint. I didn’t know this.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

Hi Gilles, > Am 17.01.2022 um 14:11 schrieb Gilles Sadowski : > > No; the remark is for making the reviewer's life easier, i.e just copy/paste > the command and see the build succeed. Without the environment variable, > the "javadoc" step fails IIRC. Ok, thanks for the hint. I didn’t know this.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.1 based on rc2

Hi folks, > Am 03.01.2022 um 18:24 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote passes with the following votes: Gilles Sadowski: +1 Bruno Kinoshita: +1 Thomas Vandahl: +1 I’ll go ahead with the release publication. Thanks to the voters. By

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons JCS 3.1

The Apache Commons project announces the release of Apache Commons JCS 3.1. Apache Commons JCS is a distributed caching system written in Java. It is intended to speed up applications by providing a means to manage cached data of various dynamic natures. JCS 3.0 and onwards require at least Ja

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha3 based on RC1

Hi Bruno > Am 13.05.2022 um 07:26 schrieb Bruno Kinoshita : > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-imaging.git;a=commit;h=b1cfcaad38de7c30f7814a5b3d80e45fe2bd9af1 > You may checkout this tag using: >git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-imaging.git > --branch common

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha3 based on RC2

Hi Bruno, > Am 13.05.2022 um 14:02 schrieb Bruno Kinoshita : > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha2 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha3. > > Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha3 RC

Re: [ALL] Don't update ossf/scorecard-action

Hi Gary > Am 28.09.2022 um 21:31 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > A specific version of the ossf/scorecard-action is approved by Apache Infra. Is there any discussion I might have missed why this is required now? Bye, Thomas - To un

Re: [parent][release][rng] Issue with release plugin multi-module builds

> Am 28.09.2022 um 14:24 schrieb Alex Herbert : > > So CP 53 behaviour was for this flag to be false. Now in CP 54 this flag is > true. Thus all multi-module builds should set this flag to false in all > non-distribution modules. > > Q. Should these properties be present in CP? They have never

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Apache Commons Parent 57 based on RC1

Hi Gary, > Am 22.04.2023 um 16:24 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Parent 56 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Parent 57. > Can we please make the commons-release-plugin an optional c

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Apache Commons Parent 57 based on RC1

Hi Gary, > Am 22.04.2023 um 16:24 schrieb Gary Gregory >: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Parent 56 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Parent 57. > Can we please make the com

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1

ns/jcs/3.2-rc1/site/rat-report.html KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1

> Am 22.08.2023 um 15:14 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons JCS 3.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons JCS 3.2. ... > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 22.08.2023 um 15:58 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Something went wrong somewhere because the tag in this email points to a > 3.3-SNAPSHOT version instead of 3.2: > >> The Git tag commons-jcs-3.2-rc1 commit for this RC is > eb9c5b36b48f2b6f45fba7986d46c7006cfb5c4c which you can browse

Re: [JCS] GitHub builds broken and Java 17

Hi Gary, > Am 26.08.2023 um 19:58 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Does anyone know why it's broken? If anyone broke it, that was me. I tried to fix the build configurations but I simply don't understand what there doing. I never put them up in the first place. > And why is was switched to Java 17 o

Re: [JCS] GitHub builds broken and Java 17

Hi Gary, > Am 26.08.2023 um 19:58 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Does anyone know why it's broken? If anyone broke it, that was me. I tried to fix the build configurations but I simply don't understand what there doing. I never put them up in the first place. > And why is was switched to Java 17 o

[CANCEL]: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1

Will need to fix some links in the vote mail. > Am 22.08.2023 um 15:14 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons JCS 3.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons JCS 3.2. > &g

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1 (2nd round with fixed links)

l KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS Please review the release candidate and vote. This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. [ ] +1 Release these artifacts [ ] +0 OK, but... [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Thank you, Thomas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1 (2nd round with fixed links)

> Please review the release candidate and vote. > This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now. > > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... My vote Bye, Thomas --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1 (2nd round with fixed links)

Could I have one more (positive :-) PMC vote please? > Am 03.09.2023 um 17:51 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons JCS 3.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons JCS 3

JCS vote

Hi folks, Could some kind soul please find some time to vote on the release 3.2 of JCS? Perhaps this weekend? We would need one more PMC vote. Thank you! Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.or

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2 based on rc1 (2nd round with fixed links)

This vote passes with the following binding +1 votes: - Henri Biestro - Rob Tompkins - Gary Gregory - Thomas Vandahl Thanks to all the voters. I will proceed with the publication. Bye, Thomas > Am 16.09.2023 um 13:41 schrieb Rob Tompkins : > > +1 > Signatures validate properly &

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons JCS 3.2 Released

Apache Commons JCS website: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-jcs/ Download it from https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-jcs/download_jcs.cgi Thomas Vandahl Apache Commons Team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev

[JCS] Could please anyone with access to bugs.openjdk.java.net help me documenting a bug fix?

Hi folks, In JCS I just fixed a bug that was caused by a changed JDK behaviour when handling remote exported methods. The change reportedly was a fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230967 This ticket, unfortunately, is not publicly available. I would like to document the JDK

[JCS] Advice sought on releasing just core

Hi folks, would it be considered good practice to release just one sub-component (commons-jcs3-core) of the project to fix bugs? All other components are unaffected. What would be the release artefact to vote on? Please advise. Bye, Thomas --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Compress 1.25.0 based on RC1

> [X] +1 Release these artifacts Signatures ok, build and tests run fine, site and reports look good. Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537) Maven home: /Users/thomas/Dev/apache-maven-3.8.4 Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: /Library/Java/JavaVirtu

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi folks, We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 rc1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/3.2.1-rc1 (svn revision 68312) The Git tag common

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

My vote: > Am 04.04.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I > would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. > > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 04.04.2024 um 21:58 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Hi Thomas, > > Thank you for preparing a release candidate. > > Something looks confusing in the source tree: > > In git master marked as version 3.2.2-SNAPSHOT, all of the Maven > modules follow the normal naming convention where di

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 04.04.2024 um 21:59 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Note that the parent pom is way behind in versions but I am not sure > it matters here (aside from not getting JPMS modules almost for free). Yes, again: intentional. This being a bug fix release for 3.2, I did not want to change too

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 04.04.2024 um 22:05 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > I think it is better to keep the release notes as a _history_ instead > of only the latest. This lets you see what you're getting when > migrating from several versions back. I don't quite get your point, I'm afraid. Isn't this what th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 04.04.2024 um 22:22 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Another note: > > The changes.xml contains XML not supported by the VM file, for > example, all of the JIRA issue IDs are lost. > I see working JIRA links in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/3.2.1-rc1/site/changes-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Bruno, > Am 04.04.2024 um 21:46 schrieb Bruno Kinoshita : > > Failed to collect > dependencies at org.apache.openjpa:openjpa:jar:2.4.3 -> > org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-kernel:jar:2.4.3 -> > com.ibm.websphere:websphere_uow_api:jar:0.0.1: Failed to read artifact > descriptor for com.ibm.websphere

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 04.04.2024 um 22:30 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > After being successful on macOS, I am seeing the following _repeatable_ > failures on Windows 10 running the default Maven goal (just `mvn`): > > ... > [INFO] Running > org.apache.commons.jcs3.utils.discovery.UDPDiscoverySenderEnc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi folks, > Am 05.04.2024 um 23:26 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Wow, that's the first macOS failure for this type of issue. Bruno and I > both see this on Windows. Ok, let's try to fix this. Could you please run the affected test only with debug log and provide the log files to me? I'll cancel t

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

I am cancelling the vote because of strange test failures in some environments. Bye, Thomas > Am 04.04.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I > would like to release Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 05.04.2024 um 17:28 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > [INFO] Running > org.apache.commons.jcs3.utils.discovery.UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest > [ERROR] Tests run: 3, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 9.526 > s <<< FAILURE! - in > org.apache.commons.jcs3.utils.dis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 14:10 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Hi Thomas, > > I ran: > > mvn test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderUnitTest -X >\test\out.txt > > and killed it after 10 minutes since it never finished. I tried 3 times. Thanks. Not good. Could you please repeat the test with the log

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 15:07 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > mvn test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest > > which failed with the log here: https://paste.apache.org/b4p09 Thanks for helping me to tackle this. I see that the network interface used for the test is a "Cisco AnyConnect

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 15:07 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > mvn test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest > > which failed with the log here: https://paste.apache.org/b4p09 Please check out from branch release-3.2.1 and try again. Bye, Thomas -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 17:20 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Ah, I was on git master on Windows, which without the VPN, now hangs in: > > [INFO] Running > org.apache.commons.jcs3.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheConcurrentNoDeadLockUnitTest > Thou shalt not run the whole test suite w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 17:48 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > And to confirm that VPN is the issue, I reconnected and got: > > [ERROR] Failures: > [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest.testPassiveBroadcast:116 > message not received > [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest.test

Re: (commons-jcs) 03/03: Skip multicast tests when no multicast interface is available

Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 19:35 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > This is where you want to use JUnit assumptions so you get visibility for > skipped tests. > Yes, I know. However, that does not work with the old JUnit3-style tests. I will fix this in the master branch where all tests already have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary, > Am 06.04.2024 um 17:20 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Switching to origin/release-3.2.1 lets me run the default Maven goal (just > 'mvn') to successfully to completion! > May I kindly ask for the debug log again? I'd like to know whether JCS can find a valid multicast interface even

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Sebastian > Am 06.04.2024 um 15:38 schrieb sebb : > > Another minor issue: > If you run 'mvn test' without first doing 'mvn clean', it fails with: > > [ERROR] JDBCDiskCacheUnitTest.testInitializePoolAccess_withPoolName:157 > » SQL Table already exists: JCSTESTTABLE_INITIALIZEPOOLACCESS in >

[jcs] multicast issues, was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

(trying to move this out of the vote thread) Hi Gary, > Am 07.04.2024 um 14:33 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Hi Thomas, > > Ran: > > mvn test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest > > Log: > > https://paste.apache.org/1hmkb Thank you. Could you please make sure that you are at commit

Re: [jcs] multicast issues, was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

Hi Gary > Am 07.04.2024 um 20:54 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Hi Thomas, > > OK, here we go: > > VPN on (Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Virtual Miniport Adapter for > Windows x64) > git checkout fe20ca994803b353c32fd0909621d822ee26263c > mvn clean test -Dtest=UDPDiscoverySenderEncryp

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc2

Hi folks, We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 rc2 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/3.2.1-rc2 (svn revision 68673) The Git tag common

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc2

My vote. > Am 20.04.2024 um 12:25 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I > would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. > > Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 rc2 is available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc2

Hi Gary, > Am 20.04.2024 um 15:30 schrieb Gary D. Gregory : > > Something is wrong with at least one ASC file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/3.2.1-rc2/commons-jcs3-dist-3.2.1-src.zip.asc > > $ gpg --verify commons-jcs3-dist-3.2.1-src.zip.asc > gpg: assuming signed data in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc2

Hi folks, > Am 20.04.2024 um 12:25 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I > would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. > > Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 rc2 is available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.11.0 based on RC1

Hi Gary, > Am 29.04.2024 um 00:24 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements (better Microsoft > Excel compatibility) since Apache Commons CSV 1.10.0 was released, so > I would like to release Apache Commons CSV 1.11.0. > > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc2

Hi Bruno, > Am 02.05.2024 um 22:01 schrieb Bruno Kinoshita : > > Tried building the project but alas I think my network has UDP multicast > issues? > > [ERROR] Failures: > [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySenderEncryptedUnitTest.testPassiveBroadcast:122 > message not received > [ERROR] UDPDiscoverySender

[JCS] How to proceed? was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc2

27;m a bit at a loss on how to tackle this problem. I'm open for suggestions. Please help! Bye, Thomas > Am 05.05.2024 um 19:20 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi Bruno, > >> Am 02.05.2024 um 22:01 schrieb Bruno Kinoshita : >> >> Tried building the project

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc2

Next attempt. > Am 20.04.2024 um 12:25 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I > would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. > > Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 rc2 is available for

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc3

Hi folks, We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 rc3 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/3.2.1-rc3 (svn revision 69406) The Git tag common

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc3

My vote > Am 27.05.2024 um 20:24 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > > We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons JCS 3.2 was released, so I > would like to release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1. > > Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 rc3 is available for review here: >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc3

This vote thread passes with the following binding +1 votes: - Gary Gregory (ggregory) - Rob Tompkins (chtompki) - Thomas Vandahl (tv) I will proceed with the release process. Thanks to the voters. Bye, Thomas > Am 27.05.2024 um 20:24 schrieb Thomas Vandahl : > > Hi folks, > >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1

://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-jcs/download_jcs.cgi Historical list of changes: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-jcs/changes-report.html Enjoy! Thomas Vandahl -Apache Commons JCS team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.11.0 based on RC1

Hi Gary, > Am 07.06.2024 um 15:53 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons > Configuration 2.10.1 was released, so I would like to release Apache > Commons Configuration 2.11.0. > > Apache Commons Configuration 2.11.0 RC1 is available for re

Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 3)

On 25.01.15 17:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > It does AFAIK - was not here and just propagated existing legal text - and > that is why it is referenced in core and not all artifacts. > Le 25 janv. 2015 16:55, "sebb" a écrit : The XEROX license relates to the file /commons-jcs-core/src/aspect/or

Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 3)

On 26.01.15 12:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > if that's the case +1 but anyway it doesnt hurt > > @Thomas: before dropping it can you confirm it a last time please? I don't even know if it actually works with the current code. It was like this when I got here (TM). I'd suggest to remove the aspe

Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 3)

On 28.01.15 20:39, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Romain, > > I've looked at the RC. > > - Signs and hashes are good > - builds find with maven 3.2.5 and Java 6 and 7, although the build of the > core takes forever... The build fails with Java 8 (I've run mvn clean > verify). It looks like it's t

Re: [VOTE][JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 4)

On 19.02.15 14:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi > > Another try, hopefully right this time (I speak about JCS in a JUG > next thursday so would be awesome to have a release ;)) > > - here is the maven repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1083/ > - assembli

Re: Fwd: Commons JCS - disk cache bugs

On 28.03.15 19:40, Wiktor Niesiobedzki wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to integrate Commons JCS into Java OpenStreetMap editor > (http://josm.openstreetmap.de). During tests I see, that from time to > time IndexedDiskCache is thrown away. I've made a simple unit test > that detects this situation: > h

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 4.1 Based on RC2 (24h vote)

On 25.11.15 23:20, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > [X] +1 Release these artifacts Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Form a separate TLP based on [math]

On 16.01.16 16:18, Phil Steitz wrote: > [ ] +1 I am in favor of this action > [X] +0 I am OK with this > [ ] -0 OK, but... > [ ] -1 I oppose this action because... Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

On 06.11.17 04:48, Gary Gregory wrote: > The document http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html clearly shows > an example of an RC tag being labeled with the "RC1" postfix. Not in the maven-release-plugin chapter. And with reason. The problem of the later copy would be, that the tagged pom.

Re: Maven release plugin?

On 06.11.17 09:01, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2017-11-06 8:59 GMT+01:00 Jochen Wiedmann : >> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> wrote: >> >>> due to the RCx procedure we cant use the maven release plugin, any >>> plan to make it working with commons release procedure or do we j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1 (roll 2)

On 06.11.17 21:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > created > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.2.1-RC2/ > (rev 1814438) Thanks, Romain. However, the POM file in this RC tag contains now --8<-- scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/co

Re: prevent registering JCSAdminBean multiple times

On 16.11.17 21:54, Tim Cronin wrote: > we have a few webapps running on the same server that use JCS. > > when moving the 2.x we started getting the following error on tomcat startup > > > > javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: It looks like you load multiple instances of Composite

  1   2   3   >