Hi,
BasicThreadFactory has an option to create daemon threads. I assume, you
have found out in the meantime?
Oliver
Am 01.05.19 um 23:07 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> Hi All,
>
> Hard to believe, but we do not have one yet.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1455
>
> Assigned to your tr
Am 20.05.19 um 16:19 schrieb sebb:
> On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 14:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:16 AM Gilles Sadowski
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le lun. 20 mai 2019 à 14:51, Gary Gregory a
>>> écrit :
Hi All:
Right now, if you uses an 'include' in a properties
Am 02.01.20 um 12:08 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita:
> Also not a user of OSGi. But I feel like it is a bug that could be reverted
> and informed in the changelog and release email?
> But not too sure if that's the best option.
> Bruno
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 202
Hi Rob,
many thanks for working on the release.
I also did a check. The builds of the jar and the site were successful
with the configuration below. Artifacts and site look good.
The NOTICE file has still a copyright year of 2019; so if you re-roll
the RC, you should adapt this. Otherwise, I fou
+1
Build works fine with Java 8, artifacts and site look good.
Oliver
Am 09.03.20 um 15:55 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
> Apache Commons Configuration 2.6 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons Configura
processor.
Credit:
This issue was discovered by Daniel Kalinowski of ISEC.pl Research Team
Oliver Heger
on behalf of the Apache Commons PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e
The form at Mitre was just submitted, so I assume that the issue will be
visible soon.
Oliver
Am 12.03.20 um 19:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> Note that https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-1953 is not
> "live" yet.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at
Am 22.07.20 um 18:28 schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
> On 2020-07-22, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>> I’m happy to merge them….will get to them by tomorrow morning ok?
>
> TBH I'd prefer to turn them off and reject the PRs.
>
> Personally I don't see any value for our downstream users if we update
> our dep
ation portion. Are there any plans to support YAML?
Thanks,
-Elijah
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Hi Simo,
Am 22.07.2012 17:54, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Good point Oliver,
I honestly didn't think about [configuration], please apologize! since
[chain] already had a
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Am 23.07.2012 09:00, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Good morning all,
so I continue proposing the already proposed roadmap: let's add the
façade APIs for the [chain] configuration stuff, adapt th
Build works fine on Windows 7 with a JDK 1.6 and Java-1.5 compatibility
profile. Artifacts look good.
There are some issues with the site:
- There is indeed a number of findbugs and pmd warnings. I trust you
that you already fixed many problematic ones. All these MALICIOUS_CODE
warnings are pr
Slightly off-topic:
Do you think the following approach could work: Consider there is a
central component - e.g. [flatfile] in sandbox - which implements
parsers for various text-base formats like YAML, JSON, CSV, ... and a
generic mechanism for transforming the parsed data into XML SAX events
ople.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Slightly off-topic:
Do you think the following approach could work: Consider there is a
central
component - e.g.
There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in method
DynamicCombinedConfiguration.getCurrentConfig(). Indeed, the
double-check locking idiom is used, however, there is a comment saying
that this safe due to the usage of a ConcurrentMap.
This may be true, but I wonder whether it
would catch someone's eye.
Ralph
Thanks for clarifying. I added a suppression in the Checkstyle
configuration so that this warning will not pop up again.
Oliver
On Jul 29, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in m
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would like to switch to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in trunk, mainly to update
the [lang] dependency to 3.x (which is a binary incompatible change).
This has been requested multiple times. Therefore, it would b
Am 31.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would like to switch to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in trunk, mainly to update
the [lang] dependency to 3.x (which is a binary incompatible change).
This has been
/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Am 31.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.9 based on the
first release candidate.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_9RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.9rc1/
Binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/con
+1
Oliver
Am 16.08.2012 22:09, schrieb Oliver Heger:
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.9 based on the
first release candidate.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_9RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger
configuration files (which is generated by JavaCC) and define its
state transition graph. They have changed because the parser now
supports comments in configuration files.
Thanks for the review.
Oliver
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
This is a vote to
Am 17.08.2012 23:58, schrieb sebb:
On 17 August 2012 21:02, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Gary,
Am 17.08.2012 21:19, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Are the Clirr warning about constant value changes from 1.8 be an issue
for
existing clients?
Or, are the values only used by [configuration] itself
er
On Aug 18, 2012, at 11:13, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 17.08.2012 23:58, schrieb sebb:
On 17 August 2012 21:02, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Gary,
Am 17.08.2012 21:19, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Are the Clirr warning about constant value changes from 1.8 be an issue
for
existing clients?
Or, are
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the
distributions. I think this is outdated. Can anybody confirm this? I
will then update the instructions accordingly.
Thanks
Oliver
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/comm
Am 20.08.2012 18:35, schrieb sebb:
On 20 August 2012 13:32, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the distributions. I
think this is outdated. Can anybody confirm this? I will then
Am 20.08.2012 16:08, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the
distributions. I think this is outdated. Can anybody
Am 20.08.2012 16:54, schrieb Ralph Goers:
Yes - and I didn't get a chance to do it last night. Please give me another 24
hrs.
Ralph
Sure, no problem.
Oliver
On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:43 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oops I meant Ralph not Sebb!
Gary
On Aug 20, 2012, at 7:38, Oliver
The vote to release Commons Configuration based on RC1 has passed with
the +1 votes from following people:
Gary Gregory
Phil Steitz
Oliver Heger
All votes are binding, no other votes were cast.
Thanks to all who reviewed the artifacts.
Oliver
Am 16.08.2012 22:09, schrieb Oliver Heger:
This
Am 21.08.2012 00:11, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:58:52PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 20.08.2012 16:08, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1
://commons.apache.org/configuration/download_configuration.cgi
(Please remember to verify the provided checksums and/or signatures
after you have downloaded a distribution!)
Oliver Heger
on behalf of the Apache Commons Team
-
To
In [lang] there are a few places where Class.forName(String, boolean,
ClassLoader) is used to load classes dynamically (e.g. in
ClassUtils.getClass()).
According to the book "OSGi in action" (written by guys from the Felix
community) it is recommended to use ClassLoader.loadClass() instead. Th
Am 01.09.2012 19:11, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All:
Checkstyle can report warnings like:
'+' should be on the previous line.
FWIW, I'm not fond of this particular checkstyle rule.
Does anyone know if the Eclipse formatter can be made to behave like this?
I've not found such setting in the gian
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development
version. This means we are free to implement major changes without
having to enforce binary backwards compatibility.
The question is: What are the goals for version 2.0? I would recommend
to define a clear focus so that
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards compatibility.
BC breakage will
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an
attribute node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface,
but of course not supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it
tries to encode the list as a comma-separated string. On reloading, such
strings are spli
with attribute splitting and delimiter parsing needs to go away.
Ralph
On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. This
means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce binary
back
Ralph
On Sep 8, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an attribute
node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface, but of course not
supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it tries to encode the list as
a comma
ation] who voted
against removing these tags.
Oliver
Benedikt
2012/9/7 Oliver Heger :
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards compatibility.
The question is:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major
Build works fine with Maven and ant on Windows 7 with JDK 1.6. Artifacts
look good, site, too, except for the following very minor points (in
addition to the things Simone already discovered):
- The JIRA report is just a blank page (I think during build an
exception is thrown - maybe an incompat
Am 11.09.2012 00:08, schrieb sebb:
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make
+1
The open points from the previous RC have been addressed.
BTW: The success rate of only 99.422% in the surefire report seems to be
caused by the fact that two tests in QuotedPrintableCodecTest are
skipped. Of course not an issue.
Oliver
Am 11.09.2012 14:26, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello A
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
I have some ideas about this topic - not fully thought out - and would
like to start a discussion. Here they are (
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this
Hi Phil,
Am 18.09.2012 20:09, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 9/17/12 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the
incomplete
support
Am 20.09.2012 22:38, schrieb Honton, Charles:
This obviously makes the concurrency problem easier :)
Apart from this case, it would be good to agree on exactly what it
means for [configuration] to be threadsafe. Is it basically the
semantics of ConcurrentHashmap? Or are there sequencing / e
One of the pain points in the 1.x versions of [configuration] is IMHO
the implementation of FileConfiguration using inheritance over
AbstractFileConfiguration and AbstractHierarchicalFileConfiguration.
I started an attempt to work around this: The part of
AbstractFileConfiguration which deals
For [configuration] there is currently a feature request [1] to add some
data type conversion facilities. In the ticket the reporter describes an
algorithm how to construct an object of class A from input of class B by
first searching for a corresponding valueOf() method, and then - if this
fai
Hi Matt,
Am 03.10.2012 21:25, schrieb Matt Benson:
If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
its Builder interface?
Yes, we are going to switch to [lang] 3.x. I would like to use the
Builder interfa
Hi,
in the last few days I have worked on a new approach for handling
reloading in a more generic and loosely coupled way. To get a better
base for discussion, I created some code (mainly in the reloading and
the new builder packages).
The basic idea is that reloading is no more handled by t
changes. However, there is not yet a persist
event. Could you give a use case for such a notification?
Thank you for the feedback!
Oliver
Thanks,
chas
On 10/11/12 1:09 PM, "Oliver Heger" wrote:
Hi,
in the last few days I have worked on a new approach for handling
reloading
Hi Benedikt,
Am 05.11.2012 21:04, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2012/11/5 Benedikt Ritter
Hi Oliver,
2012/11/5
Author: oheger
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:29:01 2012
New Revision: 1405889
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1405889&view=rev
Log:
Initial version of an immutable configuration interfa
Oliver Heger
Hi Benedikt,
Am 05.11.2012 21:04, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2012/11/5 Benedikt Ritter
Hi Oliver,
2012/11/5
Author: oheger
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:29:01 2012
New Revision: 1405889
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1405889&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/vie
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
Minor nits:
- The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate.
- There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to
encoding issues, so I guess this is nothing critical.
+1
Oliver
Am 26.11.2012 19:
Hi all,
in [configuration] [beanutils] is used to initialize properties of Java
objects defined in configuration files. This works fine as long as the
objects conform to the Java Beans specification.
Now I would like to initialize other objects, too, which implement a
fluent interface as fol
in this component
currently.
Oliver
Regards,
Benedikt
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/5zgoyid5ld7otwsv
2012/12/5 Oliver Heger
Hi all,
in [configuration] [beanutils] is used to initialize properties of Java
objects defined in configuration files. This works fine as long as the
objects
Checked build with Java 1.5 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 16.12.2012 15:03, schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
Hi,
I would like to call a vote from commons-email-1.3 based on RC6.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC5
+) fixed Clirr errors by r
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
Some reports (checkstyle, findbugs) show errors, but this does not seem
to be problematic. Also the missing license headers in test files are no
blockers IMHO.
I am not sure about the clirr errors. There is nothing mentioned in
This seems to be a Java 1.5 problem related to generics. Build works
fine with Java 6 and 7.
As we depend on [lang] which now requires Java 1.6, I guess we have to
switch to 1.6 anyway.
Are there any objections?
Oliver
Am 18.12.2012 23:22, schrieb Continuum@vmbuild:
Online report :
http://
version: 1.6.0_30, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_30\jre
Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "x86", family: "windows"
Oliver
Am 19.12.2012 21:59, schrieb Oliver
Am 20.12.2012 01:23, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:10:05PM +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Sent the main too early: The build takes pretty long on my old
machine, and it eventually failed with two test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
testMath753Shape142
liver Heger:
Am 20.12.2012 01:23, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:10:05PM +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Sent the main too early: The build takes pretty long on my old
machine, and it eventually failed with two test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
testMath753Sha
Hi all,
currently I am working on [CONFIGURATION-518] - rework of interpolation
features.
DefaultConfigurationBuilder supports that custom variable resolvers can
be defined in its definition files. I noticed that these resolvers are
not only used locally, but are also registered as global lo
Am 29.12.2012 09:43, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Hi Phil,
Le 28/12/2012 21:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 12/28/12 11:44 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
It seems a shame to turn off this feature for ALL projects because one
project can't figure out a workaround.
Can *any* project find a workaround? Is the
12 9:46 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 29.12.2012 09:43, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Hi Phil,
Le 28/12/2012 21:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 12/28/12 11:44 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
It seems a shame to turn off this feature for ALL
projects
because one
project can't figure out a wor
Hi,
recently I have worked on code regarding the creation of Configuration
objects and reloading support. I have created two Jira tickets [1, 2]
with a description of the problems I see in the current design.
The code in SVN (mainly in the new builder package) should be sufficient
to get a g
Hi Jörg,
Am 04.01.2013 17:47, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
recently I have worked on code regarding the creation of Configuration
objects and reloading support. I have created two Jira tickets [1, 2]
with a description of the problems I see in the current design
Build is successful on Windows 7 with both a JDK 1.5 and 1.7. Artifacts
and site look good.
The only issue I found is that the copyright date in NOTICE.txt is still
2012. However, because there have hardly been changes in 2013, I don't
think that this is a blocker.
So +1
Oliver
Am 06.01.201
Am 18.01.2013 13:47, schrieb Olivier Lamy:
So all has been imported.
see result here: http://people.apache.org/~olamy/commons-content/
For releasing commons parent, the ASF parent pom is on vote on dev@maven
IMHO both proper and sandbox parents must be release.
Great! Many many thanks for all
I don't want to open another can of worms, but just want to state that I
am not in favor of all those final modifiers except when applied to
member fields of a class.
IMHO, this makes code harder to read because it only adds clutter. It
also hides the occasions where final is really required,
slight exceptions it can process
the same configuration definition files. So I plan to remove
DefaultConfigurationBuilder shortly.
Oliver
Am 05.01.2013 16:48, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Hi Jörg,
Am 04.01.2013 17:47, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
recently I have
ldn't need to be bothered with them.
Sounds good. Currently I am following a bottom-up approach, i.e. I
create the various builders first. It should be possible to implement a
'meta' builder on top later.
Oliver
Ralph
On Jan 28, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
(From t
Am 08.02.2013 09:26, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Simo,
2013/2/8 Simone Tripodi
How do you feel about this? Checkstyle complains about this, and I think
it
is sufficient to tell users that an argument must not be null.
sorry, which one?
should have made that clearer :)
I removed the @t
Hi all,
once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC,
there were no strong objections, but there has never been a follow up.
For a project in Scala, I needed some limited functionality to process
command li
Resending with a different subject to potentially reach a broader audience.
Am 17.09.20 um 21:47 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
> Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC,
> there
Hi Gilles,
Am 20.09.20 um 19:44 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
> Hello.
>
> 2020-09-17 21:47 UTC+02:00, Oliver Heger :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
>> Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, t
Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit :
IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component
That's certainly true.
And nobody is forced to do anything.
When the other CM spin-offs started, there was only _one
Am 05.05.21 um 21:54 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 20:33, Oliver Heger
a écrit :
Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit :
IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component
That&#
Am 30.06.21 um 14:41 schrieb Gary Gregory:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 4:24 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi
I'm sorry, but I'm unable to see what would or would not work for the
people who chimed in. Short of calling for a vote, lets try with a poll
that could show whether there is some sort of so
Hi all,
this is a vote for the second alpha version of [configuration] 2.0 based
on the first release candidate. After the first alpha version, a couple
of enhancement requests have been implemented causing some minor changes
on interfaces. Details are available in the release notes.
The same dis
Hi Ryan,
there is no fix target date set. I have just started a vote for
releasing a second alpha version for Commons Configuration 2.0. So we
are getting closer...
Any feedback would be appreciated: Do you think the current state of the
API is okay? Where do you see problems and what would you l
My own +1.
Seems to be no good time for a vote...
Oliver
Am 12.12.2014 um 21:38 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the second alpha version of [configuration] 2.0 based
> on the first release candidate. After the first alpha version, a couple
> of enhancemen
Am 14.12.2014 um 22:45 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> Hey Oliver,
>
> 2014-12-14 22:25 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger :
>>
>> My own +1.
>>
>> Seems to be no good time for a vote...
>>
>
> It's holiday time, so... :o)
>
> I will have some time o
Hi,
Am 16.12.2014 um 20:49 schrieb Clebert Suconic:
> I have posted an user question on the user's forum about
> synchronization... but I mixed it with a dev question:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-user/201412.mbox/%3cCAKF+bspXgnE+zLjpg-9Fp+hDcAqTWEAERM=7getaut4lthe...@mail.gm
o
> with it.
>
> Running with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.2.3 (33f8c3e1027c3ddde99d3cdebad2656a31e8fdf4;
> 2014-08-11T16:58:10-04:00)
> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.2.3
> Java version: 1.7.0_71, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_71\jre
The vote to release Commons Configuration 2.0-alpha2 has passed with the
following votes:
Gary Gregory: +1
Benedikt Ritter:+1
Thomas Neidhart:+1
Oliver Heger: +1
All votes are binding, no other votes were cast.
Thanks to all who took the time to review
vote mail:
"In the past we decided that alpha releases should not go to Maven
central. Therefore, I did not deploy the artifacts to Nexus; only the
distributions were created."
Oliver
>
> Bene
>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>>> - Site can not be build
, including
instructions on how to submit bug reports, patches, or suggestions for
improvement, see the Apache Commons Configuration website:
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/
Oliver Heger, on behalf of the Apache Commons community
Have a happy holiday season
When building on Windows 7 with Java 1.6 I got a test failure:
Results :
Failed tests:
TestGenericObjectPool.testBorrowObjectFairness:2034 Thread 1 failed:
java.lang
.Throwable: Expected: 1 found: 2
Tests run: 262, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
I guess, this is one of the problematic tes
Am 09.01.2015 um 20:51 schrieb Phil Steitz:
> On 1/9/15 10:56 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 January 2015 at 17:21, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 1/9/15 10:06 AM, James Carman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> No, must be some issue with the environment or JDK. I
Am 16.01.2015 um 16:19 schrieb Duncan Jones:
> On 16 January 2015 at 14:54, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> Concerning [Math], when the possibility was raised, the majority
>>> thought that development within Commons had practical advantages
>>> (through shared burden of the development environment).
>
Hi Thomas,
On 24.01.2015 19:21, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi,
from time to time some researchers trying to find performance bugs in
open-source software create issues for collections.
One of the easy targets is the Collection#retainAll(Collection) method
as the default implementation in AbstractC
Build (both Maven and ant) was successful on Windows 8.1 with JDK 1.7.
Artifacts and site look good.
So here is my +1.
Minor nit: On the site there is currently no entry for the Javadocs of
the new release. I guess it will be added after the release?
Oliver
My exact configuration:
$ mvn -versio
Hi,
maybe the problem is on my side (it has been a long day), but I am not
able to verify the signature of the distributions:
$ gpg --verify commons-jcs-dist-2.0-beta-1-src.zip.asc
gpg: Signature made 02/19/15 11:51:21 using RSA key ID DDB37997
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
I
Build was successful (in half an hour) on Windows 8.1 with JDK 1.6.
Artifacts and site look good.
Nits:
- The sources artifacts in the binary distribution contain spurious
directories.
- IMHO a 2.0 release should have a file with release notes included
describing the possibly breaking changes to t
Maven and ant build were successful with Java 1.7 on Windows 8.1.
Artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Here is my exact configuration:
Apache Maven 3.2.1 (ea8b2b07643dbb1b84b6d16e1f08391b666bc1e9;
2014-02-14T18:37:5
2+01:00)
Maven home: C:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.2.1\bin\..
Java version
Am 23.02.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> Oliver Heger has raised concerns about this commit in JIRA [1]:
>
>> This is a strong change in the behavior of this class. The main property
> of atomic initializers was that they are non
>> blocking. Now a blocking wai
; original code, to the application using it, except in the case of an
> exception thrown on the initialize() call, which is problematic now. That
> is, this new implementation guarantees initialize() will only ever be
> called one time, and it ensures all callers receive the result
Am 01.03.2015 um 17:52 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> 2015-02-26 21:29 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger :
>
>> Hi Arthur,
>>
>> I don't have any principle objections against your implementation.
>>
>> I just don't want it as a replacement for the AtomicSafeIni
Am 02.03.2015 um 07:23 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> 2015-03-01 22:20 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger :
>
>>
>>
>> Am 01.03.2015 um 17:52 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
>>> 2015-02-26 21:29 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger :
>>>
>>>> Hi Arthur,
>>>>
>
1 - 100 of 1045 matches
Mail list logo
