I was somehow under the impression that email from my apache.org
account would go straight to the users list without any kind of
moderation. Was I wrong or is there something wrong with the list ?
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
list, or is this an
infra issue ? I am sending through gmail.
Kristian
2014-12-12 9:12 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hi Kristian,
>
> you have to subscribe to the list first. Just send a mail to
> user-subscr...@commons.apache.org
>
> Benedikt
>
> 2014-12-12 8:29 GMT+01:0
Ah, you mean an "s" too much matters ??? Nice inconsistencies in
naming of asf users lists :)
Shouldn't us...@commons.apache.org bounce then ?
Kristian
2014-12-12 18:23 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 12 December 2014 at 17:03, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
>> There appears to
Nice move;
This is actually the way I thought commons worked ("when I was a kid")
until I learned that I did not understand how commons worked :)
Kristian
2014-12-15 6:27 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson :
> On Dec 14, 2014 9:04 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote:
>>
>> Nice feedback all around. Here is a versio
I just thought I'd let you know I'm working on changes to allow
multiple threads to output to different ZipArchiveOutputStream
instances (backed by commons-io DeferredFileOutputStream or similar)
and then stitch the results back together as a single Zip file. I'm
currently just researching the sco
on allowing an executor service to be passed in to
> some APIs?
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: Kristian Rosenvold
> Date:12/15/2014 02:49 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Cc: Subject: [compress] Changes to allow multithreaded
> creation
2014-12-15 17:39 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2014-12-15, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> There is also the issue of determining if the MANIFEST.MF file really
>> needs to be the first file in the jar, which puts an interesting
>> constraint on the parallelism. I have b
Amazing digging; thanks a lot. At least for maven's code, introducing
the concept of a "root" stream that will be the start of the physical
zip stream can simplify things quite a lot.
Kristian
2014-12-16 6:48 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2014-12-15, Kristian Rosenvold wr
+1 for moving to git btw :)
Kristian
2014-12-15 11:38 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
> Le 15/12/2014 11:36, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>
>> [as an aside, maybe we should think about moving Compress to git]
>
> +1
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
> -
>
tuff is still in github, but it's a lot easier for
"anyone" to build and play around with now.
Kristian
2014-12-18 9:29 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> +1 for moving to git btw :)
>
> Kristian
>
> 2014-12-15 11:38 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
>> Le 15/12/2014 11:
There are quite a few extension points in this class that make
changing it really hard.
I just committed r1647329 which basically duplicates some code from
this class into another class. As much as I hate duplication, I wasn't
able to achieve what I wanted to without A) breaking some extension
ca
I'd like to make a public (synchronized) version of the
"toBufferedInputStream" method in this class, which would allow
zero-copy turnaround of the outputstream to an input-stream; I am a
bit puzzled why this hasn't been done yet.
Ok ?
Kristian
---
It depends :)
All the commits I did so far represent distinct pieces of
functionality that someone could choose to use by itself, so if
c-compress was released tomorrow they'd be usable. That being said,
I'm still polishing the last high-level class that provides the
consumer-friendlier stuff to c
doh. That's what I get for looking at released versions instead of
reading code at trunk like real grownups do.
Thanks,
Kristian
2014-12-23 11:08 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 23 December 2014 at 07:55, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
>> I'd like to make a public (synchr
Thanks for the comments, fixed in r1647582.
Is there such a thing as a "commons" IntelliJ code style file ?
Kristian
2014-12-23 11:46 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 22 December 2014 at 15:24, wrote:
>> Author: krosenvold
>> Date: Mon Dec 22 15:24:02 2014
>> New Revision: 1647329
>>
>> URL: http://svn.
I'll put taking a look at addRawArchiveEntry with ZipEntry on my todo
list. I have quite a few threads converging into the last class
already; but everything should be done in a few days now.
copyRawEntries could definitely be somewhere else. Originally I
implemented it on ZipArchiveOutputStream,
Yup; I'm taking care of the duplication in trunk on my github fork.
The other interesting branch to look at is the somewhat stale
"concurrentSupport" branch and in particular the class
ConcurrentZipCreator. This is my primary goal, I just went off on a
round of yak-shaving first. I seem to have fin
2014-12-28 11:35 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2014-12-26, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>> A) Think about manifest handling in genreal
>
> This applies to plexus since CC isn't doing any manifest handling at all
> right now.
Yes, I'm thinking along the lines of just mak
Stefan, I looked at your changes in the github repo
https://github.com/bodewig/commons-compress/commits/scatter-backing-store
I think they look great. Please commit them :)
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@comm
The refactoring os ZipArchiveOutputStream to use StreamCompressor is now done in
the branch https://github.com/krosenvold/commons-compress
As refactorings come it doesn't "feel" too good (extracting all the
methods to create zip headers to a different class would probably be a
refactoring with a l
2014-12-29 15:05 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2014-12-29, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> The refactoring os ZipArchiveOutputStream to use StreamCompressor is now
>> done in
>> the branch https://github.com/krosenvold/commons-compress
>
> Some c
2014-12-31 11:50 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2014-12-30, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>> The whole ZipArchiveOutputStream class reminds me of a few of the
>> 3000+ LOC java classes I refactored in maven core; sometimes the only
>> acceptable solution is to extract *all*
2015-01-02 16:22 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2014-12-31, wrote:
>
... all else fixed in r1649128..
>>static ScatterZipOutputStream
>> createDeferred(ScatterGatherBackingStoreSupplier
>> scatterGatherBackingStoreSupplier)
>
> would then be an instance method. Do you need it to be publi
gt; On 2014-12-31, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> On a related note, I just added the *last* substantial change I intend
>> to do. I will do a tweak or two, and I'm sure that last class will
>> trigger a truckload of comments, even just the name of the class:)
>
> I'm
Not entirely unsurprisingly this broken in r1648585. I'll try to
understand it tonight
Kristia
2015-01-04 11:37 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2015-01-04, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> I'll try to reproduce this as a unit test for compress later today,
>
> svn revision 1649312 - run via
>
> $ mvn
Great stuff !
> getBytesWritten vs getTotalBytesWritten - svn revision 1649322
>
> Maybe we should rename getBytesWritten to something like
> getBytesWrittenForLastEntry to make the difference more obvious?
I had hard time keeping those "written" counters correct - which you
found out :) I renam
2015-01-05 15:12 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 5 January 2015 at 13:43, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2015-01-04, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>>
>>> Most surprising to me is that it seems like the overhead of lots of
>>> small calls to RandomAccessFile.write seems to be a l
It would appear I do not have access to the commons wiki. If someone
could grant me wiki privs (and Jira at the same time), I can do some
basics for the git wiki page.
Kristian
2015-01-06 18:01 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> -1
>
> When the first components moved to Git, the agreement was that these
> wou
I just created "KristianRosenvold" account on the wiki.
Kristian
2015-01-06 20:46 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 6 January 2015 at 19:19, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Luc and Kristian have asked to be added as contributors to the Wiki. I
>> seem to be able to grant that, but need your wiki names in
I am finished with all my "itches" for the next version of c-compress
and I'll just be running through all the maven test cases tonight.
Unless bugs pop up I will not be making any further significant
changes.
I see Stefan has already been doing minor adjustments to some of my
changes. If there's
I just released plexus-archiver version 2.10-beta-1 to maven central.
This is a "technology preview" of the multithreaded Zip feature I have
been adding to commons-compress for the last few weeks, and will
basically use all available CPU cores when compressing the archive.
To test/use this featur
2015-01-10 15:29 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> what about the (unrelated) COMPRESS-290?
I'll see what I can do. Should be simple compared to the other stuff
I've been dealing with :)
>> and I'll just be running through all the maven test cases tonight.
>> Unless bugs pop up I will not be making any
We had somewhat of a discussion regarding this class on the maven dev
list over the weekend, some people wanted this code inside
commons-compress:
Code is here:
https://github.com/krosenvold/plexus-archiver/blob/2.x/src/main/java/org/codehaus/plexus/archiver/zip/ConcurrentJarCreator.java
I have
I see you fixed this. Thanks.
Kristian
2015-01-11 19:58 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2015-01-09, wrote:
>
>> @@ -336,20 +338,48 @@ public class ZipArchiveEntry extends jav
>> * @since 1.1
>> */
>> public ZipExtraField[] getExtraFields(boolean includeUnparseable) {
>>+
I'd say the problem is probably that you have too little mailing list
traffic incoming. Subscribe to a few more and you /will/ have to start
making inbox rules :)
Kristian (Who had the dubious honor of receiving more email than the
rest of my company altogether last year - 20 people)
Yup I'm done, added a small blurb in changes.xml in r1653282.
Btw it still seems like my JIRA karma is a bit weak ?
Kristian
2015-01-20 16:00 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2015-01-12, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> We had somewhat of a discussion regarding this class on the
Can you check that you did the right thing, Mark ? It seems like I
have even less permissions now; I can't even edit "own issues" any
more...?
Kristian
2015-01-23 10:13 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 23/01/2015 09:10, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2015-01-23, luc wrote:
>>
>>> Le 2015-01-23 04:00, s
Sorry; all is ok. The asf jira has a slightly different config than
the one I'm used to.
Kristian
2015-01-23 10:46 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> Can you check that you did the right thing, Mark ? It seems like I
> have even less permissions now; I can't even edit "o
Thanks for lots of great comments ! Just a few comments about some of the items;
Regarding the *Supplier interfaces, the basic idea is that once
commons-compress reaches jdk 1.8 language level (somewhere in the late
2030's :-) some of such interfaces may be modified to extend
java.util.function.Su
2015-01-23 11:52 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
> - PasswordRequiredException: the exception is in the sevenz package, do
> we want to move it elsewhere so it can be used later for other formats
> like zip (if that makes sense).
Makes sense, where should we put that ?
> - there are some missing @sin
After an intense few minutes discussing the color of the bike shed
with myself (package name) I moved the zip-unspecific parallel stuff
to org.apache.commons.compress.parallel in r1654572. This concludes
the changes Emmanuel suggested. I have already responded to a few of
the comments that did not
2015-01-26 22:27 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> Tests:
>
> Running: 'mvn clean site' gave me
>
> Failed tests:
> ZipTestCase.testCopyRawZip64EntryFromFile:361->assertSameFileContents:414
> arrays first differed at element [10]; expected:<-16> but was:<-15>
The problem appears to be that time does no
Testcase fixed in r1654901
Kristian
2015-01-26 22:37 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> 2015-01-26 22:27 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
>> Tests:
>>
>> Running: 'mvn clean site' gave me
>>
>> Failed tests:
>> ZipTestCase.testCopyRawZip64EntryFromFil
ion back to this problem.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
>
>> Testcase fixed in r1654901
>>
>> Kristian
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-26 22:37 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold <
>> kristian.rosenv
I've run through all of our tests and the release looks good.
The testcase should fail 1 in 1000 times as is and has been fixed.
I'm +1 on the release as such (but we'd normally recut or leave this
decision to the RM).
Krisian
2015-01-27 7:35 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenv
2015-01-27 15:24 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> I'd prefer a clean RC to give a positive vote. So I'll abstain for now.
That seems to be the norm :)
K
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comm
2015-01-28 19:30 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hello Stefan,
>
> - I've build this RC with Maven 3.2.5 and Java 6, 7, 8 and 9 EA. Java 6, 7
> and 8 work fine (although the site can not be build with Java 8 due to
> doclint). Java 9 fails, because it does not support target option 1.5.
I just fixed
If think later (in 2025 :-) you just make interface ThreadPredicate
extend java.util.function.Predicate.
Kristian
2015-04-12 13:14 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hi,
>
> there is currently a discussion on github about the addition of a low level
> utility class which helps to retrieve Threads [1
I'll spend some time this weekend iterating over issues for io and apply
patches that appear appropriate and uncontroversial.
Kristian
2015-05-11 7:57 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> I'll be on vacation the next week. I could do it in two weeks at the
> earliest.
>
> Benedikt
>
> 2015-05-11 5:26
2015-05-12 23:09 GMT+02:00 Kervin Pierre :
> I'd like to help if possible. What would be involved?
>
There is an abundance of issues in Jira that should be triaged somewhat
before pushing a release. You can fix issues without patches, review
existing patches and/or comment on issues. Looking thr
We (maven) /just/ managed to switch to 1.6 baseline. So I'm +1 for making
at least one more release with 1.6 ;)
Kristian
2015-06-18 18:16 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:57 AM, wrote:
>
> > Author: krosenvold
> > Date: Thu Jun 18 15:57:56 2015
> > New Revision: 1686260
> >
:00 Gary Gregory :
> [io] needs a release bad, it's been way to long. I can live with 1.6 for a
> release if is soon. Then switch to Java 7.
>
> Are you willing to RM?
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Kristian Rosenvold >
> wrote:
>
> > We (
;
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
> krosenv...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I can do the release, but I'm not entirely sure I'd have the necessary
> > priveiliges (since I'm not even a committer in commons). Then
I seem to have lost my jira permissions to assign issues to myself and
close them. I believe I had them not so long ago... ?
Kristian (krosenvold)
Forwarded message --
> From: Kristian Rosenvold (JIRA)
> Date: Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:20 AM
> Subject: [jira] [Created] (IO-481) org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils#waitFor
> waits too long
> To: iss...@commons.apache.or
2015-06-19 21:01 GMT+02:00 sebb :
> On 19 June 2015 at 19:00, wrote:
> > +class Java7Support
> > +{
> > +
> > +private static final boolean IS_JAVA7;
> > +
> > +private static Method isSymbolicLink;
> > +
> > +private static Method delete;
> > +
> > +private static Method toPath;
I reverted the fix in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1686456 simply because
it broke backward compatibility in a subtle way. The BrokenNNStream classes
supply the same instance of the IOException on all methods (and there are
tests that assert it)
Given some of the discussion
I reverted some of the package protected -> private changes, since the
tests did not even compile with this change.
Kristian
2015-06-21 13:43 GMT+02:00 sebb :
>
> Final variables are guaranteed to be safely published across threads.
> Is that true for non-final variables if they are established in a static
> block?
>
Yes. All static blocks are guranteed to be visible (all class
initialization is basically a synchronized
2015-06-21 13:43 GMT+02:00 sebb :
>
> > I'm not sure I understand; the equivalent of
> >
> > Boolean result = (Boolean) isSymbolicLink.invoke(null, path);
> > return result.booleanValue();
> >
> > Gives a style warning (uneccssary unboxing) in IntelliJ.
>
> That warning is wrong.
>
> Unboxing is c
2015-06-21 14:16 GMT+02:00 sebb :
>
>
> Is there a genuine use-case which requires that the same IOE instance
> be used? (Other than the unit tests!)
> If not, then we could look into relaxing the behaviour (and fixing the
> Javadoc) for a future release.
> If there is a use-case for always using t
2015-06-21 14:53 GMT+02:00 sebb :
> On 21 June 2015 at 13:24, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
> > 2015-06-21 13:43 GMT+02:00 sebb :
> >
> >>
> >> > I'm not sure I understand; the equivalent of
> >> >
> >> > Boolean
2015-06-21 16:14 GMT+02:00 sebb :
>
> > But there is no unnecessary unboxing here, hence no bug.
>
> >Exactly, so the IntelliJ warning is wrong.
>
> No. I added the redundant call back since that's the way you seem to
prefer round here.
Kristian
As already mentioned, I'm missing jira permissions. I'm also missing
permissions to add my key to the KEYS file (my key is in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/maven/KEYS is someone wants to
do this)
I also suspect that I'll fully be lacking any permissions to publish to
repository.apache
2015-06-22 2:53 GMT+02:00 sebb :
> >What was the Findbugs error?
>
> Best not to mix these in a single commit.
>
Sorry about that.
org.apache.commons.io.output.DeferredFileOutputStream#thresholdReached
possible file handle leak upon exception
>
> Also looks like many of the checkstyle fixes ar
> Benedikt
>
> 2015-06-22 19:53 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
>
> > Hello Kristian,
> >
> > sorry for the late reply. I'll have a look.
> >
> > Benedikt
> >
> > 2015-06-19 19:06 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> >
> >> I seem to h
fine grained control. If one of the existing
constructors is used, simply use a new IOException().
Kristian
2015-06-22 20:06 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> 2015-06-21 14:34 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold <
> kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com>
> :
>
> > 2015-06-21 14:16 GMT+02:00
2015-06-23 18:11 GMT+02:00 sebb :
>
> > org.apache.commons.io.output.DeferredFileOutputStream#thresholdReached
> > possible file handle leak upon exception
> >
>
> Can you update the SVN log message accordingly?
>
Done
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Also looks like many of the checkstyle fixes are just line
2015-06-23 18:08 GMT+02:00 sebb :
> On 23 June 2015 at 08:54, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
> > I think I'll go for the release-notes approach; given that we can find an
> > appropriate technical solution.
> >
> > Right now I'm leaning towards simply changi
My personal itch list is getting very short, and includes the following
items:
@since tag checkup
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-469
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-481
Fix 4 testcases that fail (only) in site generation due to xml parser
issues.
My ambition is to fix these thi
BOMInputStreamTest#testReadXmlWithoutBOMUtf32Be and 3 others fail in "site"
generation but not regular unit tests.
I have identified that the problem is happening because
xercesImpl/2.4.0/xercesImpl-2.4.0.jar is creeping in during site build
With regular unit tests it picks up
rt.jar!/com/sun/org
(Method.java:483)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:140)
Does anyone have any clue as to how I can fix this ?
Kristian
2015-06-24 12:08 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> BOMInputStreamTest#testReadXmlWithoutBOMUtf32Be and 3 others fail in
> "site" generation but not regular unit tests.
&g
4 June 2015 at 11:57, sebb wrote:
> > On 24 June 2015 at 11:09, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
> >> (sorry, wrong keyboard shortcut)
> >>
> >> Invalid encoding name "UTF_32BE".
> >> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1; columnNumber: 42;
Thanks !
Now I just need to get down from the Norwegian mountains. I prefer them i
wintertime with lots of snow
Kristian
4. jul. 2015 9.31 a.m. skrev "Gary Gregory" :
> Hi Kristian,
>
> Welcome to the Apache Commons PMC!
>
> Please read the following if you have not done already done so:
>
Maybe the committer email address is not your apache.org address ?
Kristian
6. jul. 2015 11.52 p.m. skrev "Luc Maisonobe" :
> Hi,
>
> I just get failures when pushing commits to [math] with an error message:
>
>
> pre-receive hook declined
> You are not authorized to edit this repository.
>
> Is
There may have been some infra related issues on this, you should try again
Kristian
2015-07-07 6:11 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> Maybe the committer email address is not your apache.org address ?
>
> Kristian
> 6. jul. 2015 11.52 p.m. skrev "Luc Maisonobe" :
>
I'm investigating a regression in the maven test suites with this
version of c-c (related to zip file attributes). At the moment I do
not know if c-c is the culprit. Please give me an extra day before
closing this vote.
Kristian
2015-08-16 20:02 GMT+02:00 Oliver Heger :
> Building with Java 1.5
I found the source of the regression, outside c-c.
So here's my +1 for the release.
Kristian
2015-08-18 12:12 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> I'm investigating a regression in the maven test suites with this
> version of c-c (related to zip file attributes). At the moment I do
+1
22. aug. 2015 21.29 skrev "Stefan Bodewig" :
> Hi all
>
> more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating
> to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than
> expected :-)
>
> Anyway, here is the vote:
>
> +1 Move to git
> -1 Stick with svn
>
> vote w
Nexus seems to think I am missing permissions to stage;
2015-09-10 07:39:36 ERROR [9864571-1641733] -
com.sonatype.nexus.staging.rest.deploy.DeployResource - Got exception
during processing request "PUT
http://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/commons-io/commons-io/2.5/com
As you can see, that did the trick ! Thanks a lot.
Kristian
2015-09-10 10:18 GMT+02:00 sebb :
> On 10 September 2015 at 08:42, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
>> Nexus seems to think I am missing permissions to stage;
>>
>>
>> 2015-09-10 0
The next release is binary compatible except for *1* method that has
been added to a (fairly infrequently used) interface. Does that still
mean I should burn 2.5 and go for 3.0. And would that be 3.0 or 3.0.0
?
Kristian
-
To unsu
on numbers are cheap :)
Kristian
2015-09-19 12:32 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> The next release is binary compatible except for *1* method that has
> been added to a (fairly infrequently used) interface. Does that still
> mean I should burn 2.5 and go for 3.0. And would t
2015-09-19 13:58 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> Just to be clear on this, the breach is adding an interface to
Oops. The breach is adding a /method/.
>
> org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerListener#endOfFileReached
> and will probably only affect a few users. I'm documenting
127.0.0.1 is not always the address for localhost. This is a can of worms
big enough to drive a medium-sized container ship into
Kristian
27. sep. 2015 4.13 p.m. skrev "Benedikt Ritter" :
> Hm... since localhost is usually only an alias for 127.0.0.1 it doesn't
> really make sense to allow one bu
> www.sandglass-software.com
>
> On 9/27/2015 8:07 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>>
>> 127.0.0.1 is not always the address for localhost. This is a can of worms
>> big enough to drive a medium-sized container ship into
>>
>> Kristian
>> 27. sep. 2015 4.13 p.m. skrev
It should happen about -90 days but go hung up in summer vacation,
which is extensive over here. The release is basically ready (minus
one small issue with an added method to an interface), but I'll see if
I can bring this back on track "real soon". Watch this space :)
Kristian
2015-10-22 20:54
I'd think commons-io too. I have once again startes moves to release the
next version so if you're quick I can review & incorporate it. Remember
testcases :)
Kristian
13. nov. 2015 18.00 skrev "Bertrand Delacretaz" :
> Hi,
>
> I've just subscribed to this list after briefly discussing this with
>
I've been through the latest changes on the
ValidatingObjectInputStream and I think they look good.
RC1 vote starts in approx 20 hrs, if anyone else wants to take a final look.
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant
enhancements since commons-io was released,
so I would like to release commons-io 2.5
Foo 2.5 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 11266)
Maven artifacts are here:
ev\projects\OpenSource\io\commons-io-2.5-src\test\io\file1-test.txt
>> as the parent directory does not exist
>> at
>>
>> org.apache.commons.io.testtools.FileBasedTestCase.createFile(FileBasedTestCase.java:60)
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.io.FileU
ible".
Let me know about the charset and any other problems you might encounter
and I'll try to fix them before spinning RC2 (hopefully this weekend).
Kristian
2015-11-26 14:20 GMT+01:00 Jörg Schaible :
> Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > We have fixed quite a few bugs and ad
I've been digging deeply into the IBM JDK 6/7 related breakages on IO RC
2.5.
A lot of them can be explained by different capabilities of XML parsers in
the different JDKs, and I have come up with a decent heuristic for
detecting this and ignoring the tests.
There are also a couple of legacy oddb
I'd still like to make 2.5 a 1.6 release, it shouldnt be that far off. Can
you put it on a branch for now ?
16. des. 2015 18.46 skrev "Gary Gregory" :
> Hi All:
>
> I was about to add some APIs to FileUtils that work with Java 7 Paths but
> [io] is still on Java 6.
>
> Are we OK to move to Java 7?
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant
enhancements since commons-io was released,
so I would like to release commons-io 2.5
commons-io 2.5 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 11732)
Maven artifacts are here:
58ebaf9e2ab4612845d8
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Kristian Rosenvold >
> wrote:
>
> > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant
> > enhancements since commons-io was released,
> > so I would like to release commons-io 2.5
&g
be
> fixed or suppressed. I am not sure whether or not the Findbugs
> errors indicate actual problems. If they do, these should be fixed;
> otherwise suppression should be configured.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> On 12/23/15 2:14 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> > We have fix
RC2 was cancelled. I was planning to pick up RC3 RSN, maybe this weekend.
Kristian
2016-01-14 23:21 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> Kristian, others? What happened to releasing 2.5 or tallying the RC vote?
>
> Thank you,Gary
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Pers
Looks like something is amiss with the central sync, the artifacts are at
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/commons-io/commons-io/
You probably need to file an issue with mvncentral.
While you're at that, you can request in the same issue that all of the
"commons" artifacts be s
22. apr. 2016 15.38 skrev "sebb" :
> On 22 April 2016 at 12:29, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > I thought I saw it. I guess I was wrong. I wonder what's taking so long?
>
> Even when Central is working well, it can take several hours (up to a
> day) to synch.
>
> That is partly why the instructions s
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
