I have requirements to eliminate collections3 from my project. The latest
released BeanUtils is still dependent on collections3 though. I see that there
is a BEANUTILS_2 branch which is still depending on collections3. However, the
master branch has moved to collections4.4. What are the chan
mons.beanutils2.BeanUtilsBean2 extends BeanUtilsBean
- org.apache.commons.beanutils2.ConvertUtilsBean2 extends ConvertUtilsBean
The last time I tried this, tests failed and I was semi-stuck as to how to fix
those.
Discussions and PRs on GitHub are welcome.
Gary
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:51 AM Josh F
r:1.3:test
[INFO]\- org.apiguardian:apiguardian-api:jar:1.1.2:test
HTH,
Gary
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 1:20 PM Josh Fenlason
wrote:
>
> I'm not tracking with that that entails. Is there a PR or Jira task
> you
could point me to?
> It looks like 2.x is still pulling in collections3. Would you be op
he content
is safe. If you believe this is a phishing email, use the Report to
Cybersecurity icon in Outlook.
GitHub and Jira are not connected for non-Apache folks.
BU2 already depends on CC 4.x, BU2 needs BEANUTILS-565 before we release.
Gary
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024, 1:27 PM Josh Fenlas
I have requirements to eliminate collections3 from my project.
The latest Validator released is dependent on collections3 though. What are
the chances of a new Validator release that is dependent on collections4? What
could I do to assist with making that happen?
Thanks,
Josh.
within the next few weeks.
Gary
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024, 3:10 PM Josh Fenlason
wrote:
> I have requirements to eliminate collections3 from my project.
> The latest Validator released is dependent on collections3 though.
> What are the chances of a new Validator release that is dep
the content
is safe. If you believe this is a phishing email, use the Report to
Cybersecurity icon in Outlook.
On 2024/09/03 19:54:05 Josh Fenlason wrote:
> That is great to hear! Is there anything I can do to assist with that?
Watch this list and test builds and release candidates when they
I concur.
-Original Message-
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 12:25 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open atta
I could live with any of these.
-Original Message-
From: Melloware Inc
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 12:25 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachm
While some might have some preferences on more recent Java versions, I haven't
seen any objections to Java 8. Staying on Java 8 shouldn't really cause issues
for anyone. Can we settle on Java 8 so this isn't an impediment to getting a
new BeanUtils 2.0 release out the door?
Josh.
-Origina
n Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 4:01 PM Josh Fenlason
wrote:
>
> Excellent, thanks for that encouraging update! Is there anything I can
> assist with?
> Josh.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 2:52 PM
> To: Commons Devel
ork.
These will likely need to be beefed up. I saw zero tests for this class in the
Groovy code base.
Stay tuned.
Gary
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 3:37 PM Josh Fenlason
wrote:
>
> Are legal concerns of using Netty's ConcurrentWeakKeyHashMap the only issue
> with Melloware's PR
Are legal concerns of using Netty's ConcurrentWeakKeyHashMap the only issue
with Melloware's PR (https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/56) from
a couple of years ago? That PR mentions
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain for details on the license,
which unfortunately no
"org.apache.commons.validator" to "org.apache.commons.validator2", correct?
Would it help if I created a PR to do that?
Josh.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Fenlason
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 9:46 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [validator] Collections 4
CAUTION: T
from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe. If you believe this is a phishing email, use the Report to
Cybersecurity icon in Outlook.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 4:06 PM Josh Fenlason
wrote:
>
>
the end of October at the
latest so I can avoid having to do my own fork of the library.
Thanks,
Josh.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Fenlason
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 3:25 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap
16 matches
Mail list logo
