[Collections] Bad download links in the Download web page

2024-09-13 Thread Christian P. MOMON
Hi, In the web page "Download Apache Commons Collections" (https://commons.apache.org/collections/download_collections.cgi), only download links about version 4.5.0-M2 are ok. All other versions (4.2, 4.1 and 3.2.2) have their download links giving "404 Not Found error". Same for the sh

Re: [Collections] Bad download links in the Download web page

2024-09-13 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi Cpm, The next site update will only offer the 4.5.x version for download. Please use 4.5.x. Gary On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, 9:04 AM Christian P. MOMON wrote: > >Hi, > >In the web page "Download Apache Commons Collections" > (https://commons.apache.org/collections/download_collections.cgi

Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0

2024-09-13 Thread Elric
On 12/09/2024 19:21, Gary D. Gregory wrote: Hi All, Any thoughts on the minimum Java platform requirement for 2.0? Options are (IMO): 8, 11, 17, or 21. I have no vote, but I would go for 21. This will likely be a decision that will have an impact for a long time. 21 is 1 year old, 17 is 3 y

Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0

2024-09-13 Thread Gary Gregory
The age does not really matter Elric, it's the percentage of people using a platform. See the links in my previous email. I think the highest we can go is 17, but that's just me. Gary On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, 4:11 PM Elric wrote: > On 12/09/2024 19:21, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > An

Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0

2024-09-13 Thread sebb
On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 22:01, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The age does not really matter Elric, it's the percentage of people using a > platform. See the links in my previous email. I think the highest we can go > is 17, but that's just me. According to the 3rd link, Java version usage in 2024 is 7

Re: [beanutils] Java plaform for 2.0

2024-09-13 Thread Richard Zowalla
My 2 cents are: BeanUtils is often used in the EE ecosystem EE 9.1 targets 8/11, EE 10 targets 11/17, EE 11 targets 17 or higher. People are still doing the EE8 to 9.1/10 move (thanks to the name change). So perhaps 11 or 17 would be a good fit for a baseline version. Gruß Richard Am 14. Sep

Re: [beanutils] For 2.0, WeakFastHashMap vs ConcurrentHashMap

2024-09-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 at 19:59, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > Hi All, > > For the upcoming 2.0.0-M1, I plan on replacing the custom WeakFastHashMap > with the stock ConcurrentHashMap. > > If you think this is a bad idea, please tell us why. It’s a good idea for the “fast” part, but the “weak” aspect a