Guys,
do we have a real blocker on the release? Being said having the RC or
not now is pointless since the tag is there, are we waiting for
anything particular? Happy to drop the RC if it brings more confusion
than it helps.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
[ X ] +1 Release this package
Build passing from tag with
Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
2017-10-18T20:58:13+13:00)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.5.2
Java version: 1.8.0_151, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre
Default locale: en_
[X] +1 Release this package (non-binding)
Built on OS X with Maven 3.5.2 and Java 1.8.0_151
NOTICE and LICENSE files are present in the source release
Checked signatures
Thanks for preparing this release,
Aaron
On 11/20/17, 7:27 AM, "Bruno P. Kinoshita"
wrote:
[ X ] +1 Release this pa
GitHub user acoburn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/45
COMMONSRDF-71
Updates location of RDF4J javadocs link
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/acoburn/commons-rdf COMMONSRDF-71
Alte
GitHub user ajs6f opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/46
Add .DS_Store to .gitignore (Mac OS X system file)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ajs6f/commons-rdf patch-1
Alternatively yo
Non-binding +1:
I got a lovely clean build from 186df0c36981a308338792f02d93fc59776b0b7c using
mvn clean install on
Apache Maven 3.5.0 (ff8f5e7444045639af65f6095c62210b5713f426;
2017-04-03T15:39:06-04:00)
Java version: 1.8.0_65, vendor: Oracle Corporation
OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.12.6"
+1
Java build for Java from src zip. ASC, MD5, SHA1, SHA512 OK.
mvn clean verify passes with:
Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
2017-10-18T03:58:13-04:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.5.2\bin\..
Java version: 1.7.0_80, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Pr
Please delete the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.2.1/
; it should not exist since the software is not released.
Personally, I'd like to see a clean VOTE email at the very least with all
the bits in place in the message instead of reading through this who
On 20/11/17 18:36, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1
>
> Java build for Java from src zip. ASC, MD5, SHA1, SHA512 OK.
>
> mvn clean verify passes with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
> 2017-10-18T03:58:13-04:00)
> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.5.2\bin\..
> Java ver
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> once we addressed most of the issues from RC1, I'd like to propose to
> release Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 based on RC2.
>
> Apache Commons RDF aims to provide a common Java API for RDF 1.1 graphs and
> datasets. API bindings in Com
Note that the Java projects passes CLIRR but fails the RAT check.
The Native project does not even include a pom.xml so the RAT check cannot
even run :-(
Gary
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/11/17 18:36, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Java build for Java from sr
GitHub user acoburn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/47
COMMONSRDF-67
The current japicmp maven plugin requires a number of javaee
libraries that are not available on JDK 9. Until this is fixed
in the upstream project, this adds the required d
On 20/11/17 19:44, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Note that the Java projects passes CLIRR but fails the RAT check.
RAT fails how? The report generated by 'mvn site' looked OK to me.
> The Native project does not even include a pom.xml so the RAT check cannot
> even run :-(
The report generated by 'mvn s
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
> > Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 RC2 is available for review at (r23205):
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rdf/apache-co
> > mmons-rdf-0.5.0-RC2/
>
> The curr
On 20 November 2017 at 21:36, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Sergio Fernández
>> wrote:
>> > Apache Commons RDF 0.5.0 RC2 is available for review at (r23205):
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 20 November 2017 at 21:36, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> > I read that Commons policy. The issues is that I didn't get that email,
> and
> > I couldn't find how to easily gather those checksums given the amount of
> > binary artifacts this sourc
BTW, my +1 (non-binding).
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 20 November 2017 at 21:36, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>> > I read that Commons policy. The issues is that I didn't get that email,
>> and
>> > I couldn
Le 20 nov. 2017 19:44, "Gary Gregory" a écrit :
Please delete the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.2.1/
; it should not exist since the software is not released.
No, the RC should not exist. This one is the only correct one since it is
aligned between v
18 matches
Mail list logo
