+1 (non binding).
Thanks Emmanuel :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-JEXL-3-1-based-on-RC1-tp4697204p4697339.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
I opened two "help wanted" items for Apache DataFu a few months ago. Both were
linked to specific Jira issues - one a generic "wish", and the other a very
specific, entry-level task.
Unsurprisingly, the generic one is still open, but the more specific item was
picked up and a new contributor wro
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 12.04.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Gilles:
>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:25:03 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>>
Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache project rather than
having the PMC support its own developer
Hi Eyal.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:36:34 + (UTC), Eyal Allweil wrote:
I opened two "help wanted" items for Apache DataFu a few months ago.
Both were linked to specific Jira issues - one a generic "wish", and
the other a very specific, entry-level task.
Unsurprisingly, the generic one is still o
On 2017-04-12, Gilles wrote:
> [Reminder: a big part of "Commons RNG" was developed inside CM and
> most PMC people did not even know about it (although I was opening
> JIRA issues all along. Hence creating a "git" repository is not
> futile if it can raise awareness.]
By now you've probably lea
On 2017-04-13, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Oliver Heger wrote:
>> I am fine with Commons RNG and Commons Numbers.
>> I would feel uneasy with a significant number of mathematical components
>> extracted from [math] that are added to Commons, even if they are small
>> and focused. It would seem strang
Hi.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:53:27 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-04-12, Gilles wrote:
[Reminder: a big part of "Commons RNG" was developed inside CM and
most PMC people did not even know about it (although I was opening
JIRA issues all along. Hence creating a "git" repository is not
futi
Hi Jörg.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:31:17 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 12.04.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Gilles:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:25:03 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 04/12/2017 05:29 PM, Gilles wrote:
Do you actually prefer advertizing a non-Apache project ra
Hi Gilles,
I looked at the issues in RNG, and I didn't find something that seemed
appropriate for a beginner. The closest, in my opinion, are RNG-33 (adding
convenience methods to UniformRandomProvider) and RNG-37 (implementing
Ziggurat). Maybe with some more explanations or project expectation
Hello.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:27:47 + (UTC), Eyal Allweil wrote:
Hi Gilles,
I looked at the issues in RNG, and I didn't find something that
seemed appropriate for a beginner. The closest, in my opinion,
are RNG-33 (adding convenience methods to UniformRandomProvider)
That one should be re
On TIKA-1631 [1], users have observed that a corrupt Z file can cause an OOM at
Internal_.InternalLZWStream.initializeTable. Should we try to protect against
this at the Tika level, or should we open an issue on commons-compress's JIRA?
A second question, we're creating a stream with the Comp
I have reported a similar issue to them, see Compress-382, maybe those
issues should be handled at Compress side, if I understood correctly the
API contract.
Luis
Em 13 de abr de 2017 3:36 PM, "Allison, Timothy B."
escreveu:
On TIKA-1631 [1], users have observed that a corrupt Z file can cause
On 04/07/2017 11:59 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> JEXL is ready for a new release, please review the artifacts and cast
> your votes.
>
> Changes since 3.0:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jexl/3.1_RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/jexl/site/change
13 matches
Mail list logo
