I'm fine with Java 7, since Java 6 has already reached EOL.
2015-11-21 19:48 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> I'd go with Java 7.
>
> Gary
> On Nov 21, 2015 3:50 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the
> build
> > is set to 1
Folks,
I take it from our collective lack of movement, that we are voting no,
and just not willing to say it. If that is the case, we should have the
courtesy to say no, and at least give closure.
dave
On 11/08/2015 02:14 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
I have already merged the changes into master,
As has java 7 reached end of life.
On 11/22/2015 09:06 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
I'm fine with Java 7, since Java 6 has already reached EOL.
2015-11-21 19:48 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
I'd go with Java 7.
Gary
On Nov 21, 2015 3:50 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
Hi,
any preference on which J
Okay, so we go with Java 8? Doesn't feel like it has reached enough market
penetration yet. But I don't know numbers about that.
2015-11-22 15:20 GMT+01:00 Dave Brosius :
> As has java 7 reached end of life.
>
> On 11/22/2015 09:06 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> I'm fine with Java 7, since Java
Unfortunately Android still uses Java 7, if you want Android
developers to be able to use the library then I think you should
target 7.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Okay, so we go with Java 8? Doesn't feel like it has reached enough market
> penetration yet. But I don
Java 7 seems OK to me, though if the code builds and test OK with Java
1.6, why not leave it at that?
Just because Java 1.6 is EOL does not mean that Java 1.6-compatible
code will stop working.
So long as the Java runtime used to run the code is updated to a
currently supported version of Java, t
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Dave Brosius wrote:
> As has java 7 reached end of life.
FYI: I think IBM still supports their Java 7 IIRC
Gayr
>
>
> On 11/22/2015 09:06 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> I'm fine with Java 7, since Java 6 has already reached EOL.
>>
>> 2015-11-21 19:48 GMT+01:
The person who called the VOTE should tally it up and report here.
Gary
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Dave Brosius wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I take it from our collective lack of movement, that we are voting no, and
> just not willing to say it. If that is the case, we should have the
> courtesy t
I overlooked a file when creating RC1, so I abandoned that, but I did
not yet delete the tag.
Unfortunately when I created the tag for RC2, it was created under validator:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/NET_3_4_RC2/
The NET tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/com
It's probably about time to release NET.
There have been quite a few improvements and fixes since the last version.
[This is a repeat of the original mail, but using a tag that actually
exists this time]
==
Net 3.4 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/comm
On 11/22/15 8:47 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The person who called the VOTE should tally it up and report here.
I did tally the VOTE. We had three -1 PMC Votes. I asked the -1s
to reconsider and they did not change their votes. Technically, we
could call it a pass and push forward, but I was not p
+1
>From src zip, builds OK, reports OK (Clirr, RAT), ASC OK, SHA1 OK, MD5 OK.
We should really fix some of the FindBugs but there are no blockers.
Gary
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:48 AM, sebb wrote:
> It's probably about time to release VALIDATOR.
> There have been quite a few improvements and
Oh, I forgot to say that the build fails with Java 8 due to the usual
Javadoc failures but it was fine with my main platform:
Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T08:41:47-08:00)
Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.3.9\bin\..
Java version: 1.7.0_79, vendor: Oracl
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/22/15 8:47 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > The person who called the VOTE should tally it up and report here.
>
> I did tally the VOTE. We had three -1 PMC Votes. I asked the -1s
> to reconsider and they did not change their votes. Technic
If you pay Oracle for long term support you still get updates for Java 7.
This means that there will be some people (like me at work :() which
have to stick to Java 7 for some time.
Am 22.11.2015 um 16:44 schrieb Gary Gregory:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Dave Brosius wrote:
As has jav
Build works fine for me with Java 1.5 and Java 1.8 on Windows 10.
Artifacts and site look good. So +1.
Interestingly, when I build the site locally my clirr report shows 12
errors. In addition to the 3 errors about methods added to an interface,
I also get a bunch of errors about public methods wh
+1
>From src zip: builds OK, reports OK, ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
Tested with Java 8 and 7:
Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T08:41:47-08:00)
Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.3.9\bin\..
Java version: 1.8.0_65, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Program Fi
Hi all,
we have accumulated enough changes since the last 4.0 release as well as
we need to provide a fix for the known remote code exploit via java
de-serialization. Therefore, I would like to start a vote to release
Commons Collections 4.1 based on RC1.
Note:
The fix for the security related i
On 11/19/2015 10:48 AM, sebb wrote:
> It's probably about time to release VALIDATOR.
> There have been quite a few improvements and fixes since the last version.
>
> ==
>
> Validator 1.5.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/validator/ (svn
> rev
On 11/22/2015 04:58 PM, sebb wrote:
> It's probably about time to release NET.
> There have been quite a few improvements and fixes since the last version.
>
> [This is a repeat of the original mail, but using a tag that actually
> exists this time]
>
> ==
>
> Net 3.4 RC2 is available for review
My suggestion would be to add a link to teh Commons Lang website to Micha's
repo and see how successful it is (i.e. if successful, I'd expect to see
users contributing other Lang related fluent APIs to it).
I'd suggest renaming to fluengLang :)
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter
w
Any thoughts on creating a JDBC for NoSQL? Including modules for MongoDb
and CouchDb for example. Over at Log4j 2, we have a mini logging oriented
framework for NoSQL. The upshot would be to replace Log4j's NoSQL support
with Commons NoSQL.
Gary
Hi Gary, I'm kinda n00b and really don't participate in the group , but
isnt' there a project that is led by Emanuel Brenard about?
http://hibernate.org/ogm/
Is there going to be an adapter from OGM to your suggestion?
How will you cope with the fact that there are several paradigms for no SQL?
W
On Nov 22, 2015 7:31 PM, "Henri Yandell" wrote:
>
> My suggestion would be to add a link to teh Commons Lang website to
Micha's
> repo and see how successful it is (i.e. if successful, I'd expect to see
> users contributing other Lang related fluent APIs to it).
>
> I'd suggest renaming to fluengL
OGM could work for log4j since we have known objects to marshall. I'll have
to study it and see if there is underlying API as generally usefull as JDBC.
Gary
On Nov 22, 2015 7:22 PM, "Yair Zaslavsky" wrote:
> Hi Gary, I'm kinda n00b and really don't participate in the group , but
> isnt' there a
25 matches
Mail list logo
