On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
> (copied from the release notes):
>
> Fixed Bugs:
> o LOGGING-124: The jar manifest n
FYI: Craig is fine with having his authors tags removed from BeanUtils (and
any other Apache source code)
I'll make the necessary changes this weekend.
2013/3/6 Gary Gregory
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Christian Grobmeier >wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Gary Gregory
> > w
Le 2013-03-07 10:05, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on
RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
(copied from the release notes):
Fixed Bug
Hi Simo
Thanks for confirming. Very much appreciated.
Regards
Felix
Am 06.03.2013 um 16:16 schrieb Simone Tripodi:
> Hi Felix!
>
> indeed, we are putting effort on NOT breaking the backwards
> compatibility with 1.2.X, we updated to version 1.3 - due to some APIs
> update - and I personally pl
I have create BEANUTILS-432 [1] for this.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-432
2013/3/6 Oliver Heger
> Am 06.03.2013 13:35, schrieb sebb:
>
> On 6 March 2013 11:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have recently learned that changing the required Java version fo
thoughts? :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all mates,
> I am going to drop the 'tasks' page[1] since TODOs are tracked in JIRA.
> B
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, luc wrote:
> Le 2013-03-07 10:05, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart
>> **wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
>>>
>>> This release candidate has the follow
OK by me
On 7 March 2013 11:29, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> thoughts? :)
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all mates,
>>
Good, cleaning it right now :)
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:03 PM, sebb wrote:
> OK by me
>
> On 7 March 2013 11:29, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> thoughts?
Remember there is a -Ptest-deploy profile that can be used to test
what will be deployed.
This puts the output in target/deploy
I've found it's sometimes necessary to use "package" as well as
"deploy" to ensure everything is included in the deploy phase.
On 7 March 2013 11:36, Thomas Neidhart w
Hi all guys,
while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
Opinions?
TIA!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.liv
Hi all,
I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars - any objections?
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mar 7, 2013, at 7:34, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars
+1
Gary
> - any objections?
>
> TIA,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.
OK by me.
On 7 March 2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
> during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
> related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
>
> Opinions?
> TIA!
>
On 7 March 2013 12:33, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars - any objections?
OK to change Checkstyle/PMD to eliminate warnings.
But I would avoid rewrapping to the new line length unless it's
obviously easier to read.
> TIA,
> -Simo
>
> htt
On 7 March 2013 15:05, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Thu Mar 7 15:05:17 2013
> New Revision: 1453909
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453909
> Log:
> checkstyle: PackageHtml module no longer needed, package documentation moved
> from package.html to package-info.java
Is there a check
On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
> during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
> related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
>
> Opinions?
-1
build-gump.xml i
On 07/03/2013 12:33, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am going to increase the Line length up to 120 chars - any objections?
I prefer 80 but I don't do anywhere near enough work on FileUpload for
my views to carry much weight.
Mark
-
On 7 March 2013 12:52, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Thu Mar 7 12:52:04 2013
> New Revision: 1453831
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453831
> Log:
> checkstyle: Avoid inline conditionals.
I think Checkstyle is wrong in this case.
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/s
On 7 March 2013 15:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
>> during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
>> related files to 2007, I think it would make sense
On 07/03/2013 15:43, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 15:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>>
>>> while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
>>> during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
>>> related f
> OK to change Checkstyle/PMD to eliminate warnings.
>
> But I would avoid rewrapping to the new line length unless it's
> obviously easier to read.
sure, just to suppress warnings, no more additional work intended
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
htt
>
> Is there a check to ensure package-info.java exists?
>
yes, just plugged, it is the
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
-
To
>> I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
>> but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
>> [Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
>>
>> If so, that would surely satisfy the dependencies?
>
> Sure, but that wasn't what was being proposed.
On 7 March 2013 16:02, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
>>> but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
>>> [Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
>>>
>>> If so, that would surely satisfy the dependencies?
Hi,
after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the TreeMap
imlementation of this JRE.
Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue with
backing map), but some are more serious and would also require that certain
tests to be disabled when run with an IBM
On 07/03/2013 16:19, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the TreeMap
> imlementation of this JRE.
> Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue with
> backing map), but some are more serious and would also requir
Thomas,
the web page indicates. i'd suggest doing that to see if it helps
* Post a message on the Java Runtimes and SDKs Java Runtimes and SDKs Forum.
* Send an email directly to us at our Java Tools email.
-- dims
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after testing
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 16:19, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the
> TreeMap
> > imlementation of this JRE.
> > Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue wi
On 7 March 2013 16:16, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 16:02, Simone Tripodi wrote:
I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
[Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
If so,
> Done, but it will take some while to find out if the changes are
> correct, as Gump runs take several days at present.
>
> There's a problem that causes the Maven repo proxy to hang sometimes.
> See Gump list for details
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/gump-general/201301.mbox/%3C87e
I have changed this for Jira422TestCase.java in r1453986. As I said there
are a lot of classes that also use the combination of $Revision$ and
$Date$. I think I can go ahead and replace those also?
Benedikt
2013/3/5 Benedikt Ritter
> I'm a bit short on time right now. I'll try to have another
On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
> (copied from the release notes):
>
> Fixed Bugs:
> o LOGGING-124: The jar manifest now cont
> I have changed this for Jira422TestCase.java in r1453986. As I said there
> are a lot of classes that also use the combination of $Revision$ and
> $Date$. I think I can go ahead and replace those also?
Consistency is IMHO a good thing, and in that specific case I'd go
ahead for $Id$ only
my 2 c
2013/3/7 Simone Tripodi
> > I have changed this for Jira422TestCase.java in r1453986. As I said there
> > are a lot of classes that also use the combination of $Revision$ and
> > $Date$. I think I can go ahead and replace those also?
>
> Consistency is IMHO a good thing, and in that specific case
Hi,
I have installed the following JDK on my machine:
java version "1.6.0"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxi3260sr12-20121025_01(SR12))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux x86-32
jvmxi3260sr12-20121024_126067 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
J9VM - 20121024_126067
JIT - r9_201209
On 03/07/2013 11:09 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed the following JDK on my machine:
>
> java version "1.6.0"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxi3260sr12-20121025_01(SR12))
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux x86-32
> jvmxi3260sr12-20121024_126067 (JI
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed the following JDK on my machine:
>
> java version "1.6.0"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxi3260sr12-20121025_01(SR12))
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux x86-32
> jvmxi3260sr12-20121024_126067 (JIT enabled,
On 03/07/2013 11:09 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed the following JDK on my machine:
>
> java version "1.6.0"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pxi3260sr12-20121025_01(SR12))
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Linux x86-32
> jvmxi3260sr12-20121024_126067 (JI
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
[snip]
> Anyway, the logic in WeakHashtable is flawed, as it relies on the queue
> to purge elements from the table. When considering for example the
> elements method:
>
> public Enumeration elements() {
> purge();
> return super.elements()
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 March 2013 13:25, wrote:
>> Author: britter
>> Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
>> New Revision: 1452037
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452037
>> Log:
>> Add JavaDoc and SVN Keywords
>
> -1
>
> Please don't use $Date$ - it is rendered using th
On 07/03/2013 23:39, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 3 March 2013 13:25, wrote:
>>> Author: britter
>>> Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
>>> New Revision: 1452037
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452037
>>> Log:
>>> Add JavaDoc and SVN Keywords
>>
>>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 23:39, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 3 March 2013 13:25, wrote:
Author: britter
Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
New Revision: 1452037
URL: http://svn.apache
On 7 March 2013 18:49, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
>>
>> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
>> (copied from the release notes):
>>
>> F
On 7 March 2013 18:36, wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Thu Mar 7 18:36:15 2013
> New Revision: 1453990
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453990
> Log:
> Fix first step in release howto.
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/math/trunk/doc/release/release.howto.txt
>
> Modified: commons/proper/math/trunk
On 7 March 2013 19:29, wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Thu Mar 7 19:29:41 2013
> New Revision: 1454037
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454037
> Log:
> Exclude download cgi from source distribution.
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/assembly/src.xml
>
> Modified: commons/proper/
On 7 March 2013 19:52, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Thu Mar 7 19:52:39 2013
> New Revision: 1454057
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454057
> Log:
> releng: added RC profile for staging site deployment
Is that intended to merge with / override the rc profile in parent, or
does it have
Hi,
Niall, thanks for stepping in for me. It felt harsh to me too to see the
veto, especially when having the the committers guide [1] in mind that
states
"In extreme situations, it may be necessary to veto (-1) a commit but
please beware that this is an extreme sanction and rarely warranted."
Thi
>> releng: added RC profile for staging site deployment
>
> Is that intended to merge with / override the rc profile in parent, or
> does it have a different function?
> If so, it should have a different name.
to be merged in the one defined in the parent - IIUC the parent in RC
doesn't provide th
On 03/08/2013 01:25 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 18:49, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC1.
>>>
>>> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.1
On 03/08/2013 01:45 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 18:36, wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Thu Mar 7 18:36:15 2013
>> New Revision: 1453990
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1453990
>> Log:
>> Fix first step in release howto.
>>
>> Modified:
>> commons/proper/math/trunk/doc/release/release.h
On 03/08/2013 01:54 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 20:35, wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Thu Mar 7 20:35:01 2013
>> New Revision: 853535
>>
>> Log:
>> Update javadoc links.
>
> I assume this is to correct a faulty site build?
>
> Or will this have to be done after every site build/deploy?
>
On 03/08/2013 01:49 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 19:29, wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Thu Mar 7 19:29:41 2013
>> New Revision: 1454037
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454037
>> Log:
>> Exclude download cgi from source distribution.
>>
>> Modified:
>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/mai
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new
>> version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe
>> "These nested if statements could be combined" shoul
54 matches
Mail list logo
