To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 26 November 2012 17:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Traceability by who?
>
> PMC members can easily verify that what is committed to dist matches what
> they verified using what they downloaded and the MD5s that came with them.
> They are the ones responsible for the vote and the artifacts so I don
Hello.
> > > in classes Gamma and Beta, some functions are package private:
> > > - logGammaSum
> > > - logGammaMinusLogGammaSum (for lack of a better name)
> > > - bcorr
> > > These functions are meant to be used by other functions,
> >
> > None of these functions seem to used. Am I missing
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:44:27AM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > > > > in MATH-803 [1] it was decided to deprecate
> > > > RealVector.ebeMultiply/Divide,
> > > > > because these methods were difficult to support with sparse vectors.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
On 11/22/2012 02:22 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.11 is
[X] +1 Release
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Just my vote FTR.
--
^TM
-
With 4 binding votes (Gary, Luc, Mladen and Sebastian)
this vote has been passed!
I'll copy the artefacts to dist site and create ANN
message after the mirrors pick up.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:55:14AM +, sebb wrote:
> On 26 November 2012 17:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > Traceability by who?
> >
> > PMC members can easily verify that what is committed to dist matches what
> > they verified using what they downloaded and the MD5s that came with them.
> > The
Think that @subject speaks for itself :)
Seems the /www/dist.apache.org/maven-repository is abandoned.
Where should I put the maven artefacts?
... or even better anyone with the karma is
very much welcome to copy them from
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.11/maven/
to corresponding loca
I usually follow http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Gary
On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:38, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Think that @subject speaks for itself :)
> Seems the /www/dist.apache.org/maven-repository is abandoned.
> Where should I put the maven artefacts?
>
> ... or even better anyone with th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 11/27/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I usually follow http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Yeah, but doesn't this creates new set of binaries/artefacts
which at the end are not the same we voted for?
IMHO they at least have different time stamp.
Regards
--
^TM
--
Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code does
now, but you can't trust either yourself or somebody else in the future.
Better to do the checks.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Then the answer would be: no
> ch
The process creates all you need in nexus. You have to move the -bin
and -src files out before you release to maven central though.
Gary
On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:24, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I usually follow http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
>>
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:33:40PM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:44:27AM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
> >
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > > > > in MATH-803 [1] it was decided to deprecate
> > > > > RealVector.ebeMultiply/Di
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:24:26AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code does
> now, but you can't trust either yourself or somebody else in the future.
> Better to do the checks.
I don't agree because in this case, the situation is akin
On 11/27/2012 03:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
The process creates all you need in nexus. You have to move the -bin
and -src files out before you release to maven central though.
Hmm,
I did mvn -Prelease deploy -DskipTests
So suppose -bin and -src went away.
Can I revert that?
Regards
--
^TM
-
On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:54, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 03:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> The process creates all you need in nexus. You have to move the -bin
>> and -src files out before you release to maven central though.
>>
>
> Hmm,
> I did mvn -Prelease deploy -DskipTests
> So suppose -b
On 27 November 2012 15:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 9:54, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/2012 03:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> The process creates all you need in nexus. You have to move the -bin
>>> and -src files out before you release to maven central though.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm,
On 11/27/12 6:42 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:24:26AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
>> Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code does
>> now, but you can't trust either yourself or somebody else in the future.
>> Better to do the checks.
> I don't
Hello.
Quoting from the previous thread about this subject:
> As far as I am concerned, 3.1 could be released anytime now.
[Luc Maisonobe, September 14, 2012]
Plenty of needed work has been done since then. Most of it could have been
done _after_ releasing 3.1!
Most of the current contributors ag
On 11/27/2012 04:12 PM, sebb wrote:
Can I revert that?
Yes, provided that you have not published the Nexus staging dir (and
I've not seem the commit messages).
I can delete it if you like.
Sure, please do.
Regards
--
^TM
--
On 27 November 2012 15:31, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 04:12 PM, sebb wrote:
Can I revert that?
>>
>>
>> Yes, provided that you have not published the Nexus staging dir (and
>> I've not seem the commit messages).
>>
>> I can delete it if you like.
>>
>
> Sure, please do.
>
O
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:22:26AM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/27/12 6:42 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:24:26AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >> Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code does
> >> now, but you can't trust either yourself o
I can only say from my own experience that people make mistakes over time and
having the code warn them when that happens is a good thing.
Your experience may be different but I have to admit that I have done some
pretty silly things along the lines of forgetting to follow some constraint.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:15:13AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> I can only say from my own experience that people make mistakes over time and
> having the code warn them when that happens is a good thing.
>
> Your experience may be different but I have to admit that I have done some
> pretty
On 11/27/2012 05:00 PM, sebb wrote:
On 27 November 2012 15:31, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 11/27/2012 04:12 PM, sebb wrote:
I can delete it if you like.
Sure, please do.
OK, done.
Do you also want me to upload the files from
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.11/maven/
ready for pr
On Nov 27, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:55:14AM +, sebb wrote:
>> On 26 November 2012 17:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> Traceability by who?
>>>
>>> PMC members can easily verify that what is committed to dist matches what
>>> they verified using what t
On 27 November 2012 17:16, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:55:14AM +, sebb wrote:
>>> On 26 November 2012 17:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
Traceability by who?
PMC members can easily verify that what is committ
I've uploaded the artifacts from the RC vote area:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.11/maven/
to the Nexus staging area:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-086/commons-daemon/commons-daemon/1.0.11/
The directory contents agree as far as I am concerned,
On 27 November 2012 18:29, sebb wrote:
> On 27 November 2012 17:16, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:55:14AM +, sebb wrote:
On 26 November 2012 17:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Traceability by who?
>
>
Le 27/11/2012 16:30, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> Quoting from the previous thread about this subject:
>> As far as I am concerned, 3.1 could be released anytime now.
> [Luc Maisonobe, September 14, 2012]
>
> Plenty of needed work has been done since then. Most of it could have been
> d
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
Minor nits:
- The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate.
- There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to
encoding issues, so I guess this is nothing critical.
+1
Oliver
Am 26.11.2012 19:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
>
> Minor nits:
> - The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate.
>
Patches? ;)
> - There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to
> encod
On 11/27/2012 04:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Quoting from the previous thread about this subject:
>> As far as I am concerned, 3.1 could be released anytime now.
> [Luc Maisonobe, September 14, 2012]
>
> Plenty of needed work has been done since then. Most of it could have been
> d
Hi,
2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:22:26AM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 11/27/12 6:42 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:24:26AM -0800, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > >> Actually, I would still recommend checks. You may know what the code
> does
>
Hi Gilles,
2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:33:40PM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:44:27AM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
> > >
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > > > > in MATH-803 [1] it
Hi Gilles,
2012/11/27 Sébastien Brisard
> Hi Gilles,
>
>
>
> 2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:33:40PM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:44:27AM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
>> >
Hello.
> > [...]
> Actually, I would like the methods to be tested, so they cannot be
> private. That's the reason why I made them package private.
You can indirectly test them by passing appropriate arguments to the public
methods that use them. Please do not select a visibility scope just for t
Hi.
> > [...]
> > >
> > > Is "ebeDivide" a (mathematical) "vector" operation?
> > > IMHO, it's an operation on 2 lists of values.
> > >
> >
> I agree, but it's still useful to have it on vectors... But I'm happy with
> map.
Sorry, I've just implemented the MathArrays option.
We can always add th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 11/27/12 3:43 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: erans
> Date: Tue Nov 27 23:43:06 2012
> New Revision: 1414470
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1414470&view=rev
> Log:
> Contents for the release notes.
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
>
> Modifie
On 11/27/12 1:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 04:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Quoting from the previous thread about this subject:
>>> As far as I am concerned, 3.1 could be released anytime now.
>> [Luc Maisonobe, September 14, 2012]
>>
>> Plenty of needed work has b
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
Hi Gilles,
2012/11/27 Gilles Sadowski
> Hi.
>
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Is "ebeDivide" a (mathematical) "vector" operation?
> > > > IMHO, it's an operation on 2 lists of values.
> > > >
> > >
> > I agree, but it's still useful to have it on vectors... But I'm happy
> with
> > map.
>
> Sorry,
Hello,
2012/11/28 Phil Steitz
> On 11/27/12 1:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > On 11/27/2012 04:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> Quoting from the previous thread about this subject:
> >>> As far as I am concerned, 3.1 could be released anytime now.
> >> [Luc Maisonobe, Septe
Hi,
2012/11/28 Phil Steitz
> On 11/27/12 3:43 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: erans
> > Date: Tue Nov 27 23:43:06 2012
> > New Revision: 1414470
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1414470&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Contents for the release notes.
> >
> > Modified:
> > commons/
Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Continuum-Build-Host: vmbuild
X-Continuum-Project-Id: 107
X-Continuum-Project-Name: Commons Net
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/con
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
Hello,
2012/11/28 Sébastien Brisard
> Hi,
>
>
> 2012/11/28 Phil Steitz
>
>> On 11/27/12 3:43 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
>> > Author: erans
>> > Date: Tue Nov 27 23:43:06 2012
>> > New Revision: 1414470
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1414470&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Contents fo
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases?
>
> Yes.
>
> > I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it
> still
> > breaks BC. Are sure we want that?
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
59 matches
Mail list logo
