On 11/27/2012 04:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > Quoting from the previous thread about this subject: >> As far as I am concerned, 3.1 could be released anytime now. > [Luc Maisonobe, September 14, 2012] > > Plenty of needed work has been done since then. Most of it could have been > done _after_ releasing 3.1! > Most of the current contributors agree that releases should happen more > often; yet they don't. > I would like that a set of objective criteria be written down that would > define when a new release is deemed adequate. [I had suggested some.] > This discussion should be held in another thread since (as the above quote > summarizes), it was agreed that the 3.1 release was due. > > At this point, I propose to start the release process using the "old" (about > to be deprecated) procedure. > Indeed, I surely do not want the release to be further delayed because of > "newbie" mistakes on using the new procedure (CMS for the site, etc.). > Let's "divide and conquer": We release 3.1 now and allow users to benefit > from the many new features and bug fixes. While they test the new release, > we begin to prepare 3.2 with the new procedure, starting with the site. > > OK?
+1 Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
