[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-sql (in module commons-jelly) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration. T

Re: [all] xdoc vs. apt

2012-09-18 Thread luc
Le 2012-09-18 07:46, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : Hi, Hi Sébastien, 2012/9/18 Sébastien Brisard : Hi, thanks for these answers. I agree that apt does not seem much better than xdoc, but it at least offers table formatting and so on. So can anyone recommend a good format? Otherwise, I'm qui

Re: [all] xdoc vs. apt

2012-09-18 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Luc, 2012/9/18 luc : > Le 2012-09-18 07:46, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : >> >> Hi, > > > Hi Sébastien, > >> >> 2012/9/18 Sébastien Brisard : >>> >>> Hi, >>> thanks for these answers. >>> I agree that apt does not seem much better than xdoc, but it at least >>> offers table formatting and so on.

Re: [math] About MATH-852: Improvements to the Developer's Guide

2012-09-18 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 07:45:24AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to make a move on this issue. Does everyone agree with what's > already written in this ticket (not much, I'm afraid). > Does anyone want to add anything to the formatting section? This > should be something we are

Re: [all] xdoc vs. apt

2012-09-18 Thread Ralph Goers
I did the whole Flume web site in Sphinx - http://flume.apache.org. It works great for documentation but isn't really designed to build a web site - although you can. The Maven plugin has a few gotchas at the moment: 1 - it has a bug that causes it to use a lot of memory on multi-module bu

Re: [all] xdoc vs. apt

2012-09-18 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Gilles, > > As you both point out indirectly, the Javadoc system is not exactly suitable > to compose a scientific document. But I remind that its main goal is to > explain the API of a code, not to explain the science that supports the > implementation. > As a matter of fact, I was talking abo

Re: [all] xdoc vs. apt

2012-09-18 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi Luc. > > [...] > >> > >>So at least we have to think a little about it. > >> > >Another option would be this: since maven-site works with strict > >xhtml > >(unlike javadoc), we can embed MathML code in our pages. I'm not sure > >how we would do it in xdoc or apt, but we can certainly write our

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: [all] xdoc vs. apt

2012-09-18 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/18/12 6:47 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi Gilles, > >> As you both point out indirectly, the Javadoc system is not exactly suitable >> to compose a scientific document. But I remind that its main goal is to >> explain the API of a code, not to explain the science that supports the >> implem

Re: [configuration] Thoughts about multi-threading

2012-09-18 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/17/12 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi Jörg, > > many thanks for your input! > > Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible: >> Hi Oliver, >> >> Oliver Heger wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the >>> incomplete >>> support for concurrent acces

Re: [all] xdoc vs. apt

2012-09-18 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Phil, thanks for your thoughts! 2012/9/18 Phil Steitz : > On 9/18/12 6:47 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >> Hi Gilles, >> >>> As you both point out indirectly, the Javadoc system is not exactly suitable >>> to compose a scientific document. But I remind that its main goal is to >>> explain the AP

Re: [Math] About "NullArgumentException"

2012-09-18 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, 2012/9/17 Gilles Sadowski : > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:29:41AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> OK, I give up. Lets do option 2. Just warn users in the User Guide >> somewhere that our APIs are in general not null-safe and unless the >> javadoc explicitly allows nulls, they can expect NPE w

[math] apachecon

2012-09-18 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, does anybody plan to go to ApacheCon 2012? Would be nice to meet each other there. Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [math] apachecon

2012-09-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
I should be there. I will present a talk about community gathering around open-source project in the space field… Luc Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >Hi, > >does anybody plan to go to ApacheCon 2012? >Would be nice to meet each other there. > >Thomas > >

Re: [Math] About "NullArgumentException"

2012-09-18 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/18/12 12:02 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hello, > > 2012/9/17 Gilles Sadowski : >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:29:41AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> OK, I give up. Lets do option 2. Just warn users in the User Guide >>> somewhere that our APIs are in general not null-safe and unless the >>>

Re: [all] xdoc vs. apt

2012-09-18 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > Hi Phil, > thanks for your thoughts! > > 2012/9/18 Phil Steitz : > > On 9/18/12 6:47 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > >> Hi Gilles, > >> > >>> As you both point out indirectly, the Javadoc system is not exactly > >>> suitable > >>> to compose a scientific document. But I remind that its m

Re: [math] apachecon

2012-09-18 Thread Nick Burch
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Thomas Neidhart wrote: does anybody plan to go to ApacheCon 2012? I'm not involved in math, only validator, but I'll be there :) The Monday (5th November) is a hackathon, which should be a great chance for commons developers (and others!) to get together to work on code /

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [functor] Patch for FUNCTOR-14, new Generators and Ranges

2012-09-18 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi all, me again bringing a new implementation idea for the Generators API in [functor], and looking forward to some thoughts on this :-) There is a separate branch for this issue [1], and here's what has been done. - Split Generator interface into Generator interface and LoopGenerator (abst

Re: [math] apachecon

2012-09-18 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/18/12 12:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > does anybody plan to go to ApacheCon 2012? > Would be nice to meet each other there. > > Thomas > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For addition

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: Promote vfs-cifs out of sandbox?

2012-09-18 Thread Dan Tran
I turns out the current vfs-smb sandbox already have tests, all we need is to provide it with a test url ( via system property) per vfs test instruction There are 2 fail tests relate to classloader cases which I am not familiar with Can some one take a look? Thanks -D On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3

Re: Promote vfs-cifs out of sandbox?

2012-09-18 Thread Dan Tran
Tests in error: testLoadClass(org.apache.commons.vfs2.impl.test.VfsClassLoaderTests): code.ClassToLoad testSealing(org.apache.commons.vfs2.impl.test.VfsClassLoaderTests): code.sealed.AnotherClass Tests run: 1745, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0 On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Dan Tran w

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss