Hello.
> testing of special functions involves comparing actual values returned
> by CM with expected values as computed with an arbitrary precision
> software (I use Maxima [1] for this purpose). As I intend these tests
> to be assesments of the overall accuracy of our implementations, the
> numb
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:33:05PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/29/12 3:04 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > To summarize:
> > (1) Does anyone disagree with having all CM exceptions inherit
> > from a new "MathRuntimeException" which itself will inherit
> > from the stand
Hi Gilles,
thanks for your answer.
2012/8/30 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hello.
>
>> testing of special functions involves comparing actual values returned
>> by CM with expected values as computed with an arbitrary precision
>> software (I use Maxima [1] for this purpose). As I intend these tests
>> to b
Hi,
2012/8/30 Gilles Sadowski :
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:33:05PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 8/29/12 3:04 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > To summarize:
>> > (1) Does anyone disagree with having all CM exceptions inherit
>> > from a new "MathRuntimeException" which it
Le 30/08/2012 05:08, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> 2012/8/30 Gilles Sadowski :
>> Hello.
>>
>> To summarize:
>> (1) Does anyone disagree with having all CM exceptions inherit
>> from a new "MathRuntimeException" which itself will inherit
>> from the standard "RuntimeException
Hi Christian,
(pardon the brevity, on the phone)
I do not have the privilege to grant access. There is a whole process
for that. Yes, create JIRAs for patches. Don't know why git does that,
sorry.
Gary
On Aug 29, 2012, at 20:00, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello
>
> I did some more unit tests. C
> > [...]
> >
> > Thus, shall I open a JIRA ticket with the tasks of completing the "throws"
> > clauses of all CM methods?
> > Does someone absolutely needs this task tobe completed before releasing 3.1?
> > [I don't think that it's possible without a huge effort from everyone.]
Ticket created:
I've started to see this SAXParseException in [codec] trunk and other
commons components. Ideas?
[INFO] Generating "JIRA Report" report--- maven-changes-plugin:2.7.1
Aug 30, 2012 9:16:52 AM org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodBase
getResponseBody
WARNING: Going to buffer response body of l
On 30 August 2012 14:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've started to see this SAXParseException in [codec] trunk and other
> commons components. Ideas?
JIRA was upgraded recently, perhaps the plugin is not very resilient
to XML formatting changes.
Does the problem still occur with components that have
Le 30/08/2012 15:52, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
> Hi all guys,
>
> new Apache Maven Fluido Skin is gonna be released soon, I started
> experimenting locally how the _main_ commons site would look alike if
> the new skin would be applied (with some modifications): voilà[1] :)
>
> If you think that p
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 30/08/2012 15:52, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> new Apache Maven Fluido Skin is gonna be released soon, I started
>> experimenting locally how the _main_ commons site would look alike if
>> the new skin would be applied (w
Salut Luc,
> These are good news. Would we be able with this setting to go to svnpubsub?
yes they will work, skin and SCM publishing are unrelated stuff -
Olivier Lamy, which is also commons committer, already did the job for
Apache DirectMemory via a new mvn plugin called scm-publish, hopefully
Well done Simo!
I have a couple of issues though:
- The main page should, like today, give you a table of the active (aka
proper) components.
- I find the slider gadget thingy disconcerting. I do not know that it will
slide, I thought it was a bug and that the other components were missing
(see a
Hi Simo,
great work, I really like the fluido skin and would like to see it go
live for commons.
One minor issue: does the releases section need to have a drop down
although there is only one entry in the sub menu? IMHO the commons
parent site does not need a releases section at all. The list
dis
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi Simo,
>
> great work, I really like the fluido skin and would like to see it go
> live for commons.
>
> One minor issue: does the releases section need to have a drop down
> although there is only one entry in the sub menu? IMHO the com
On Aug 30, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Thus, shall I open a JIRA ticket with the tasks of completing the "throws"
>>> clauses of all CM methods?
>>> Does someone absolutely needs this task tobe completed before releasing 3.1?
>>> [I don't think that it's possi
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:58 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 August 2012 15:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:37 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 30 August 2012 14:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > I've started to see this SAXParseException in [codec] trunk and other
> >> > commons compon
2012/8/30 Gary Gregory :
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hi Simo,
>>
>> great work, I really like the fluido skin and would like to see it go
>> live for commons.
>>
>> One minor issue: does the releases section need to have a drop down
>> although there is only one
On 30 August 2012 15:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Well done Simo!
>
> I have a couple of issues though:
>
> - The main page should, like today, give you a table of the active (aka
> proper) components.
> - I find the slider gadget thingy disconcerting. I do not know that it will
> slide, I thought it
On 30 August 2012 16:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:58 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 30 August 2012 15:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:37 AM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 30 August 2012 14:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >> > I've started to see this SAXParseExce
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:53 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 August 2012 16:51, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 30 August 2012 16:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > All,
> >> >
> >> > Do we want both the MD5 in org.apache.commons.codec.digest.Md5Crypt
> a
On 30 August 2012 16:50, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Thu Aug 30 15:50:01 2012
> New Revision: 1378996
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1378996&view=rev
> Log:
> Add SVN EOL setting
Might fix the Checkstyle trailing EOL complaints?
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/m
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:36 PM, sebb AT ASF wrote:
> On 30 August 2012 16:50, wrote:
> > Author: sebb
> > Date: Thu Aug 30 15:50:01 2012
> > New Revision: 1378996
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1378996&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Add SVN EOL setting
>
> Might fix the Checkstyle trail
On 08/30/2012 06:31 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:53 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 30 August 2012 16:51, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 30 August 2012 16:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> All,
>
> Do we want both the MD5 i
On 08/30/2012 12:41 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 30/08/2012 05:08, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
>> Hello,
Hi,
sorry, I did not participate much in the discussion.
>> 2012/8/30 Gilles Sadowski :
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> To summarize:
>>> (1) Does anyone disagree with having all CM exceptions inherit
>
Hi,
there are quite some differences on the javadoc style in the source
files, e.g. the number of spaces before a @param description, whether
there is an empty line between @param, @return and @throws.
Any thoughts on that? I am willing to clean up but do not want to impose
any personal preferenc
I, in contrast, am quite fond of this technique if there is a clear
correlation between the test and the resource and if the resource is scoped
to testing.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> > This
> > clutters the code, and I will move these
Hi all!
>> - I find the slider gadget thingy disconcerting. I do not know that it will
>> slide, I thought it was a bug and that the other components were missing
>> (see above). Then, poof!, it does slide. I would not use it so prominently
>> if at all.
table restored, more work on the carousel
as a side note: I think we could upgrade also the commons logo itself
starting from an svg the ASF made available[1], unfortunately I am not
good with inkscape... :(
best,
-Simo
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejour
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are quite some differences on the javadoc style in the source
> files, e.g. the number of spaces before a @param description, whether
> there is an empty line between @param, @return and @throws.
>
I like the default Eclipse
2012/8/30 Simone Tripodi :
> Hi all!
>
>>> - I find the slider gadget thingy disconcerting. I do not know that it will
>>> slide, I thought it was a bug and that the other components were missing
>>> (see above). Then, poof!, it does slide. I would not use it so prominently
>>> if at all.
>
> table
Step 1: Make "Welcome to the Apache Commons" half its current font size.
G
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2012/8/30 Simone Tripodi :
> > Hi all!
> >
> >>> - I find the slider gadget thingy disconcerting. I do not know that it
> will
> >>> slide, I thought it was a bug
On 30 August 2012 20:33, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all!
>
>>> - I find the slider gadget thingy disconcerting. I do not know that it will
>>> slide, I thought it was a bug and that the other components were missing
>>> (see above). Then, poof!, it does slide. I would not use it so prominently
>>>
Hi,
2012/8/30 Simone Tripodi :
> Salut Luc,
>
>> These are good news. Would we be able with this setting to go to svnpubsub?
>
> yes they will work, skin and SCM publishing are unrelated stuff -
> Olivier Lamy, which is also commons committer, already did the job for
> Apache DirectMemory via a ne
Hi
You've stumbled upon
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-285
due to the recent upgrade of the ASF JIRA instance.
On 2012-08-30 15:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've started to see this SAXParseException in [codec] trunk and other
> commons components. Ideas?
>
> [INFO] Generating "JIRA Repor
2012/8/30 Olivier Lamy :
> Hi,
>
> 2012/8/30 Simone Tripodi :
>> Salut Luc,
>>
>>> These are good news. Would we be able with this setting to go to svnpubsub?
>>
>> yes they will work, skin and SCM publishing are unrelated stuff -
>> Olivier Lamy, which is also commons committer, already did the jo
On 8/29/12 8:22 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
> testing of special functions involves comparing actual values returned
> by CM with expected values as computed with an arbitrary precision
> software (I use Maxima [1] for this purpose). As I intend these tests
> to be assesments of the overall
Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:21:43 -0400
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > there are quite some differences on the javadoc style in the source
> > files, e.g. the number of spaces before a @param description,
> > whether there is an emp
Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:58:54 +0200
schrieb Thomas Neidhart :
> On 08/30/2012 06:31 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:53 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 30 August 2012 16:51, Gary Gregory
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM, sebb wrote:
> >>>
> On 30 August
On Aug 30, 2012, at 17:58, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:21:43 -0400
> schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> there are quite some differences on the javadoc style in the source
>>> files, e.g. the number of sp
Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:05:50 -0400
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 17:58, Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> > Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:21:43 -0400
> > schrieb Gary Gregory :
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> there are quite som
On Aug 30, 2012, at 18:22, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:05:50 -0400
> schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
>> On Aug 30, 2012, at 17:58, Christian Hammers wrote:
>>
>>> Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:21:43 -0400
>>> schrieb Gary Gregory :
>>>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhar
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hello,
[...]
Thus, shall I open a JIRA ticket with the tasks of completing the "throws"
clauses of all CM methods?
Does someone absolutely needs this task tobe completed before releasing
3.1?
[I don't think that it's possible without a huge effort from everyone.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hello,
right, until we reach a consensus, I've inlined the reference data as
double[][], trying to keep those arrays to a reasonable size.
I really would like to provide publicly available extensive validation
of all special functions we have (and will) implement. It seems to me
very important. BOO
2012/8/30 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hello.
>
>> testing of special functions involves comparing actual values returned
>> by CM with expected values as computed with an arbitrary precision
>> software (I use Maxima [1] for this purpose). As I intend these tests
>> to be assesments of the overall accuracy
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
>> I've uploaded a screenshot of that page taken with my mobile [1].
>> Doesn't look to well, anything you can do about that?
:(
> Step 1: Make "Welcome to the Apache Commons" half its current font size.
yup, I have no more bullets in my gun that the one Gary suggested, I
just re-uploaded the si
53 matches
Mail list logo
