On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hi Hen,
>>
>> I am not really comfortable knowing that a SOE can be a "normal" code
>> path. It would have to be Javadoc'd to boot.
>>
>> I can see catching IllegalStateException and Il
I'd like to release 3.0.1 of Lang. It would contain the following 11 fixes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+LANG+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0.1%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cann
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> I'd like to release 3.0.1 of Lang. It would contain the following 11
> fixes:
>
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+LANG+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0.1%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Dupli
Here's a generated site:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.1-SNAPSHOT-site/
Review the additions in the clirr report. Note the checkstyle and
findbugs reports have items that need cleanup prior to release.
Hen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I'd like
I've done some tests of snapshot deployment, here are my observations:
- Continuum is not properly configured to deploy Maven snapshots. If we
want to use it we'll have to request some help from the infra team.
- Snapshots for several projects using the old groupId commons-* can't
be deployed
Le 28/07/2011 22:01, Henri Yandell a écrit :
Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
Yeah let's use java.util.logging instead :)
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For addi
>
>> For very big matrix (ie : beyond 500 or 1000 rows/columns), the
>> computation is faster if you transpose the second matrix and then
>> multiply. The two inner loops are inversed and it allows a
significant
>> gain for very big matrix (about 40% compared to Commons Math for
>> 1000x1000
On 2011-08-02, Mladen Turk wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.7/
> The svn tag is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_7_RC1/
> The proposed 1.0.7 release is:
> [ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 1.0.7 Stable
> [ ] Broken - do not re
+1
Thanks Mladen!
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The proposed Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.7 release is now available for
> voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.7/
> The svn tag is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/1/11 11:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> svn list https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases
>>
>> compare_dirs.pl grab_releases.sh
>> sign_and_hash.sh verify_archive_eq
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
- Mail original -
> The proposed Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.7 release is now available for
> voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.7/
> The svn tag is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_7_RC1/
>
>
Hi,
one of the main drivers for switching to Java5 was that the methods you
use to determine the compressed and uncompressed sizes of data for ZIP
archives used to return ints in Java 1.4 and new methods have been added
that return longs.
I've committed an ignored unit test inside the ZIP package
Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
I've been discussing the permissions issue for the old groupIds on Nexus
with the Infra team (i.e components using the old groupId
commons- need a specific configuration on the snapshot
On 02/08/2011 15:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
>
> I've been discussing the permissions issue for the old groupIds on Nexus
> with the Infra team (i.e components using the old groupId
> comm
On 2 August 2011 15:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 15:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
>> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
>>
>> I've been discussing the permissions issue for the old groupIds on Nexus
>> with the Infra
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10739&projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:13:08 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:13:51 +
Total time: 42s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10740&projectId=67
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:13:58 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:14:22 +
Total time: 23s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build N
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10742&projectId=67
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:42:31 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:42:43 +
Total time: 12s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10745&projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:46:35 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:47:48 +
Total time: 1m 12s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10746&projectId=67
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:47:50 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:48:00 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build N
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10748&projectId=69
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:48:12 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:48:24 +
Total time: 11s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10749&projectId=70
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:48:25 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:48:55 +
Total time: 29s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build N
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10750&projectId=71
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:48:57 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:49:42 +
Total time: 45s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10751&projectId=72
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:49:46 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:51:07 +
Total time: 1m 21s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10754&projectId=74
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:59:04 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:59:15 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10756&projectId=76
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:59:33 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:59:49 +
Total time: 16s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10757&projectId=78
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 15:59:50 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:00:00 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10760&projectId=81
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:01:43 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:02:01 +
Total time: 18s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10762&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:02:27 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:04:04 +
Total time: 1m 37s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Nu
On 08/02/2011 06:00 PM, Continuum@vmbuild wrote:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10757&projectId=78
I see there is online report.
Is there really a need for such high volume of messages to
the developers list like there's not enough email message
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10764&projectId=94
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:04:21 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:04:42 +
Total time: 21s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10766&projectId=96
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:05:27 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:05:41 +
Total time: 14s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10768&projectId=99
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:07:22 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:07:44 +
Total time: 21s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10770&projectId=101
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:08:02 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:08:25 +
Total time: 22s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10771&projectId=106
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:08:26 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:08:56 +
Total time: 29s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10772&projectId=107
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:08:57 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:10:19 +
Total time: 1m 21s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build N
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10773&projectId=108
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:10:21 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:12:02 +
Total time: 1m 41s
Build Trigger: Forced
Bui
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10775&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:12:15 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:12:27 +
Total time: 12s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numb
Le 02/08/2011 18:04, Mladen Turk a écrit :
I see there is online report.
Is there really a need for such high volume of messages to
the developers list like there's not enough email messages
already?
Yesterday there was 30 messages like those, so I suppose
the same number is going to hit us toda
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10784&projectId=136
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:16:25 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:16:58 +
Total time: 32s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10785&projectId=206
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:17:00 +
Finished at: Tue 2 Aug 2011 16:18:27 +
Total time: 1m 27s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build N
I love that we are still rolling along here :)
Gary
On Aug 2, 2011, at 3:50, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's a generated site:
>
>http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0.1-SNAPSHOT-site/
>
> Review the additions in the clirr report. Note the checkstyle and
> findbugs reports have it
Jörg Schaible wrote:
[snip]
> I'd like to add first a getRawMessage() calling super.getMessage() to
> Contexted(Runtime)Exception as counter part to the
> getFormattedExceptionMessage(). I'll do it this evening.
Done.
- Jörg
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
>
> I've been discussing the permissions issue for the old groupIds on Nexus
> with the Infra team (i.e components using the old gro
On 8/2/11 5:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
>> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
>>
>> I've been discussing the permissions issue for the old groupIds on Nexus
>> with t
With my implicit +1 we have 6 binding votes
As such, Daemon 1.0.7 has been voted as stable.
I'll copy the files to the dist, and make ANN later
this week.
Thanks to all who helped testing!
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/2/11 5:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
>>> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.org?
>>>
>>> I've been discussing th
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> What benefits do we get by using Nexus
A real lot of work saved. (Beleave me. I've been RM for the same
projects with and without Nexus and it's really a difference.)
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
wi
I've updated the site.
* Checkstyle: A javadoc item that Matt has said he'll work on.
* FindBugs: Complains about an NPE, however it's not true and is
because FindBugs doesn't understand our Validate library.
* PMD: Down to one item to do with equals + hashcode. Might be worth
fixing, but no rush.
Hi,
I'm finalizing unit tests for the conjugate gradient method, for which I'm
using Hilbert matrices (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_matrix).
These matrices are nice because
i. they are symmetric, positive definite,
ii. they are ill-conditioned,
iii. their inverse is known in closed-form
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/07/2011 22:01, Henri Yandell a écrit :
>>
>> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :)
>
> Yeah let's use java.util.logging instead :)
Primarily that I don't get the feeling we have a major community of
developers on c-loggin
On 8/2/11 10:36 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> What benefits do we get by using Nexus
> A real lot of work saved. (Beleave me. I've been RM for the same
> projects with and without Nexus and it's really a difference.)
>
I am not so sure about t
On 8/2/11 10:48 PM, Sebastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm finalizing unit tests for the conjugate gradient method, for which I'm
> using Hilbert matrices (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_matrix).
> These matrices are nice because
> i. they are symmetric, positive definite,
> ii. they are il
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I am not so sure about that. I guess it depends on what kind of
> simple scripts you are willing to use to automate things and how
> much you care about being certain that that things are working and
> you know exactly what is going on. Perso
On 8/2/11 11:09 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I am not so sure about that. I guess it depends on what kind of
>> simple scripts you are willing to use to automate things and how
>> much you care about being certain that that things are workin
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Nothing, other than that is exactly what I do and I know exactly
> what is going on. I don't see any real saving, that's all and I see
> no need to bring in proprietary gui-based software into the mix or
> to wget stuff from remote hosts. Nob
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10810&projectId=67
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 3 Aug 2011 06:38:40 +
Finished at: Wed 3 Aug 2011 06:38:52 +
Total time: 12s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build N
On 8/2/11 11:30 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> Nothing, other than that is exactly what I do and I know exactly
>> what is going on. I don't see any real saving, that's all and I see
>> no need to bring in proprietary gui-based software into t
Le 03/08/2011 08:40, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 8/2/11 11:30 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Nothing, other than that is exactly what I do and I know exactly
what is going on. I don't see any real saving, that's all and I see
no need to bring in pr
60 matches
Mail list logo
