- Mail original -
De: "Dave Brosius"
Cc: "Commons Developers List"
Envoyé: Mardi 19 Juillet 2011 06:03:11
Objet: Re: [BCEL] Next release
If we can agree that BCEL will have a minimum requirement of 1.5 for the
next version, then we should probably actually use 1.5 throughout on
purpose
On 18/07/2011 23:17, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> Tomcat 7.0.x is using a sub-set of BCEL for annotation scanning without
>> any problems.
>
> using trunk directly? ...or are you saying it's covered through tests
> and so it's another project that tests BCEL's usage through Gump?
I'll try and be clear
On 19/07/2011 05:03, Dave Brosius wrote:
> If we can agree that BCEL will have a minimum requirement of 1.5 for the
> next version, then we should probably actually use 1.5 throughout on
> purpose, rather than by accident. I'd be happy to participate in making
> these changes. Can we vote on that p
you can find the guide in our web site[1]
[1]
http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/gsoc/2010/scxml-eclipse/guide/using-visual-scxml.html
在 2011年7月19日 下午1:34， 写道：
> Great,
>
> But how to i export to SCXML type - all i have is export the files and i
> got them (model and diagram) in thier original fo
Nice to have Joerg,
every contributions is always welcome :)
Feel free to add that feature, I'd like to add the Guice integration
as well since it is a common pattern I've been repeating over the time
:P
Have a nice day, all the best!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99so
Guys,
we have missed the second ognl report. It would be good if we could
write it pretty fast to show the inc people that ognl is active and
well, even when we have forgotten that report.
Was there anything else besides: everything well, first discussion
about graduation raised?
Cheers
Christia
Hi Stephen
it looks like indeed that [collections] development is in stand-by :(
Give me a voice if you need any help to release it, I'd would be more
than pleased to be helpful!
If you're interested on contributing on [graph], keeping an eye on
moving codebase to collections, you are welcome as we
Hi Christian,
I wrote it time ago as a reply of July11[1] request, can you please
sign and attach?
Otherwise just tell me if I am allowed to paste and sign at your
plece, for me it works as well! :P
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
PS not sure but IIUS that's the third report we submit...
[1
Oh oh thanks, this is a mentor fail :-)
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> I wrote it time ago as a reply of July11[1] request, can you please
> sign and attach?
> Otherwise just tell me if I am allowed to paste and sign at your
> plece, for me it works as w
Please Christian don't say so!!! :)
we are a team and we play all together, if something goes wrong IMHO
we should just to try to fix the problem, we success and fail all
together :)
Have a nice day and thanks for taking care of it!
All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Vote passes [!]
>
> 6 +1s.
>
> Gary Gregory
> Matt Benson
> Oliver Heger
> Jörg Schaible
> Stephen Colebourne
> and my own implicit +1.
>
> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
Status:
Tag copi
Great achievement Henri,
and congrats for the release!!!
I'm so sorry I didn't take part to the review process but honestly not
being familiar with Lang I was a little worried on influencing both
positively/negatively the vote.
I'll do my best to help more next time!
Have a nice day, all the best!
+1 for using 1.5
So then let's call it 6.0? ...and work through bugzilla towards a release?
cheers,
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.or
On 07/19/2011 05:03 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
+1 for using 1.5
So then let's call it 6.0? ...and work through bugzilla towards a release?
I agree with naming it 6.0. Another more important reason is that this
version of bcel is backwards incompatible with previous releases, in
this regard:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Stephen
> it looks like indeed that [collections] development is in stand-by :(
> Give me a voice if you need any help to release it, I'd would be more
> than pleased to be helpful!
> If you're interested on contributing on [graph], keepi
Congrats! Long Live Commons Lang 3.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Great achievement Henri,
> and congrats for the release!!!
> I'm so sorry I didn't take part to the review process but honestly not
> being familiar with Lang I was a little worried on influencing both
>
Of course Matt, I would be much more than pleased to co-work with you!!!
What I need is just the new laptop arrives, ATM I'm using a temporary
computer where I cannot install my toys due to resources limitations.
I'm pretty sure in 2 more working days I'm in the conditions to give a help!
Many than
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
> releasing 3.0.
>
> Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
> Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with
> somethi
2011/7/19 Gary Gregory
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
> > releasing 3.0.
> >
> > Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
> > Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not c
As long as Commons IO is marked as a test dependency, I am okay with
it. I just don't want it to be a compile-time dependency for the main
source.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Interesting issue; though thankfull
2011/7/19 Paul Benedict
> As long as Commons IO is marked as a test dependency, I am okay with
> it. I just don't want it to be a compile-time dependency for the main
> source.
>
And it is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/trunk/pom.xml
commons-io
commons-io
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> As long as Commons IO is marked as a test dependency, I am okay with
> it. I just don't want it to be a compile-time dependency for the main
> source.
>
It is specified in the test scope in the POM.
Gary
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:24
Hi All:
I am glad to know there is a 3.0 way of doing that, which is:
@Test
public void testEscapeXmlSupplementaryCharacters() {
CharSequenceTranslator escapeXml =
StringEscapeUtils.ESCAPE_XML.with(
NumericEntityEscaper.between(0x7f, Integer.MAX_VALUE) );
as
Personally, I'm OK with using JUnit and mocking utilities as they are
both specifically intended for testing. I think using IOUtils in
testing [lang] is distinctly dubious, especially for a single method,
and I'd much rather see the code copied. This isn't a -1 veto, but its
a strong disapproval.
Goo to know. If IO is imported just for one test case, then +1 for
Stephen's suggestion. Copy the code and shrink the dependency graph.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
> Personally, I'm OK with using JUnit and mocking utilities as they are
> both specifically intended f
HI All:
I do not understand the general reluctance to reuse code in a clean way
through jars, especially in this case for tests.
I shake my head every time I open the search type dialog in Eclipse for my
(larger) work projects and see a dozen StringUtils classes (half of them in
org.apache).
I u
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
> Personally, I'm OK with using JUnit and mocking utilities as they are
> both specifically intended for testing. I think using IOUtils in
> testing [lang] is distinctly dubious, especially for a single method,
> and I'd much rather see t
Gary,
I think it's about intention. If you have intentions of further
expanding the user of Commons IO in test cases, I think it makes sense
to use it as a dependency. But if it is simply a one-off without plans
of further use, then I would copy the method.
Paul
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:26 AM,
On 7/19/11 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Congrats! Long Live Commons Lang 3.
Great work, all!
Sorry I missed the gong on the VOTE. Release looks fine.
Phil
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Great achievement Henri,
>> and congrats for the release!!!
>> I'm so so
On 19 July 2011 16:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
> When you say "Personally, I'm OK with using JUnit and mocking utilities as
> they are both specifically intended for testing." are you thinking that
> there are alternative solutions?. IMO, JUnit is a requirement, not something
> we should even consider
Where's the hurt in adding it as a test dependency?
Keeping the main dependencies tight is good; but I don't understand
the value in an overtight test dependency list.
In this case IO seems to make sense. It will encourage more test-data
being used for testing by making it easier to throw data ar
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Gary,
>
> I think it's about intention. If you have intentions of further
> expanding the user of Commons IO in test cases, I think it makes sense
> to use it as a dependency. But if it is simply a one-off without plans
> of further use, the
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Vote passes [!]
>>
>> 6 +1s.
>>
>> Gary Gregory
>> Matt Benson
>> Oliver Heger
>> Jörg Schaible
>> Stephen Colebourne
>> and my own implicit +1.
>>
>> I'll start dredging up th
So you're not saying that we have to escape > 0x7f (old behaviour),
but that we have to escape any supplementary characters?
Hen
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am glad to know there is a 3.0 way of doing that, which is:
>
> @Test
> public void testEsca
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> Vote passes [!]
>>>
>>> 6 +1s.
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory
>>> Matt Benson
>>> Oliver Heger
>>> Jörg Schaible
>>> Stephen C
On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> Vote passes [!]
>>>
>>> 6 +1s.
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory
>>> Matt Benson
>>> Oliver Heger
>>> Jörg Schaible
>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>> a
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Vote passes [!]
6 +1s.
Gary Gregory
Matt Benson
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Vote passes [!!
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011
On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, H
On 19 July 2011 20:12, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 20:12, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz
wrote:
> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell w
Hi Hen,
I have more questions than answers...
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> So you're not saying that we have to escape > 0x7f (old behaviour),
Yeah, the way I read the W3C site, I thought we'd need to escape code
points > 65,536 (above the BMP)
>
> but that we hav
On 19 July 2011 21:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:16 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 19 July 2011 20:12, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz
>>
On 7/18/11 6:31 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> All,
>
> I have pushed the implementation of the Miller Regression technique, along
> with some tests. I am sure that there are a lot of sharp corners to file
> down and improve. However, I thought it would be prudent to get it out and
> then we can fur
I think Luc was suggesting implementing the algorithm in extended precision.
-Greg
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/18/11 6:31 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I have pushed the implementation of the Miller Regression technique,
> along
> > with some tests
On 7/19/11 4:13 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> I think Luc was suggesting implementing the algorithm in extended precision.
I don't really see need for that at this point. To settle the issue
on results precision, you should start though with high-precision
(or at least precision at the level pres
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Commons Lang 3.0
Commons Lang is JDK 1.5+ and has updated the API to support Java 5
features, such as generics and varargs. Deprecated parts of the API
have been removed.
This is NOT a backwards compatible release. Because of this, we
Hello,
I was working on some regression issues when I stumbled into the need to
solve a system like
R y = b or R'y = b.
R is an upper or lower triangular, b is a vector.
Does this functionality exist? If not, can I add it? And where?
Thanks,
-Greg
Can you just use the back-substitution phase of an LUD or QR solver?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was working on some regression issues when I stumbled into the need to
> solve a system like
>
> R y = b or R'y = b.
>
> R is an upper or lower triangular,
On 7/19/11 9:55 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was working on some regression issues when I stumbled into the need to
> solve a system like
>
> R y = b or R'y = b.
>
> R is an upper or lower triangular, b is a vector.
>
> Does this functionality exist? If not, can I add it? And where?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> Vote passes [!]
>>>
>>> 6 +1s.
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory
>>> Matt Benson
>>> Oliver Heger
>>> Jörg Schaible
>>> Stephen Co
53 matches
Mail list logo
