Re: [ognl] internal cache performance improvement

2011-06-07 Thread henrib
Hi Simo; You might want to take a look at jexl in the org.apache.commons.jexl2.internal.introspection and org.apache.commons.jexl2.internal packages for ideas, more specifically at IntrospectorBase. Jexl caching is roughly a hashmap keyed by classes whose values are (essentially) hashmap keyed on

[DAEMON] Tagging 1.0.6

2011-06-07 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, There's been few changes since 1.0.5 so I recon it's a good time to release a bug-fix/new-feature version. I'll use the "standard" iterative RCx model with renaming a RCx tag if voted. Q: I saw some projects are using svn for releases instead copying the artifacts trough the ftp. Are using

Re: [DAEMON] Tagging 1.0.6

2011-06-07 Thread sebb
On 7 June 2011 10:54, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > There's been few changes since 1.0.5 so I recon it's > a good time to release a bug-fix/new-feature version. +1 > I'll use the "standard" iterative RCx model with renaming > a RCx tag if voted. +1 > Q: I saw some projects are using svn for rel

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-06-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [ognl] internal cache performance improvement

2011-06-07 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Hi, guys. I set-up the shade plugin inside the OGNL pom [1], which allows us to do some performance test on S2. WDYT? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-16 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org

Re: [ognl] internal cache performance improvement

2011-06-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mau, fine having such tests and fine you added the shade in a profile so it doesn't collide with the normal build process, but let's discuss about different topics in separate threads ;) Anyway, good job! All the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On T

Re: [ognl] internal cache performance improvement

2011-06-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Salut Henri!!! thanks a lot for your contribution!!! your suggestiona are indeed really useful and having a look at the packages you pointed is a big worth, thanks!!! Anyway, everybody feels comfortable on working on the cache is welcome, I'll fill an issue about it soit will be tracked, feel free

[sandbox][digester][proposal] merging digester3 to current trunk

2011-06-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all again guys, the second attempt of Digester3 on sandbox[1] is ready to be reviewed; it is basically the Digester on trunk, with polished and improved APIs, with a new unique universal Loader and Rules binder[2], and annotations/xmlrules extensions have been rewritten using the binder as a cor

Re: [DAEMON] Tagging 1.0.6

2011-06-07 Thread Mladen Turk
On 06/07/2011 12:28 PM, sebb wrote: Q: I saw some projects are using svn for releases instead copying the artifacts trough the ftp. Are using this as well or the [1] is still valid? AFAIK, that has to be set up through infrastructure first. Yep that was my understanding as well. Seems like

[dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I'm in the middle of moving job and in the new company they need to manage data organized in graph structures. So, since it would involve my profession and the new boss is more than encouraging me on participating on oss, I'm interested on resurrecting the commons-graph from dormant to

[VOTE] Revised dormancy policy - take 3

2011-06-07 Thread Phil Steitz
Thanks, all, for the great comments on the previous versions [1][2]. I have tried to incorporate them. Revised Dormancy Policy 0) To move a component to dormant requires a VOTE. A single -1 suffices to postpone the action; but a -1 in a dormancy vote is really a +1 to help sustain or advance th

Re: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy - take 3

2011-06-07 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 07.06.2011 22:24, schrieb Phil Steitz: Thanks, all, for the great comments on the previous versions [1][2]. I have tried to incorporate them. Revised Dormancy Policy 0) To move a component to dormant requires a VOTE. A single -1 suffices to postpone the action; but a -1 in a do

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 I don't know the codebase, but recently I also had the need for some graph algorithms. So I am really interested. Oliver Am 07.06.2011 21:41, schrieb Simone Tripodi: Hi all guys, I'm in the middle of moving job and in the new company they need to manage data organized in graph structures.

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Sujit Pal
Not a committer nor a commons developer, but I've used neo4j in the past for this sort of thing. It provides a database backend and a few graph algos to traverse the graph, and it works great. They also have a community edition. Just pointing this out in case there is overlap. On Tue, 2011-06-07 a

RE: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy - take 3

2011-06-07 Thread Jason Pyeron
-1, needs better handling of details and an outside revival procedure. > -Original Message- > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:25 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy - take 3 > > Thanks, all, for the gr

Re: [DAEMON] Tagging 1.0.6

2011-06-07 Thread sebb
On 7 June 2011 18:37, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 06/07/2011 12:28 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> Q: I saw some projects are using svn for releases instead >>> copying the artifacts trough the ftp. Are using this as well >>> or the [1] is still valid? >> >> AFAIK, that has to be set up through infrastructure

Re: svn commit: r1133155 - /commons/proper/jxpath/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/FunctionLibrary.java

2011-06-07 Thread sebb
On 7 June 2011 21:49, wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Tue Jun  7 20:49:04 2011 > New Revision: 1133155 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1133155&view=rev > Log: > [JXPATH-141] FunctionLibrary Multithreading issue I don't think this is fully thread-safe. Although the byNamespace Map is

Re: [DAEMON] Tagging 1.0.6

2011-06-07 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/7/11 5:40 PM, sebb wrote: > On 7 June 2011 18:37, Mladen Turk wrote: >> On 06/07/2011 12:28 PM, sebb wrote: Q: I saw some projects are using svn for releases instead copying the artifacts trough the ftp. Are using this as well or the [1] is still valid? >>> AFAIK, that has to b

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 And don't be bashful about refactoring ideas - this thing has never been released (though IIRC, maven at least used to depend on a snapshot version). Phil On 6/7/11 12:41 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I'm in the middle of moving job and in the new company they need to > manage da

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 although I probably won't work on it. Ralph On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I'm in the middle of moving job and in the new company they need to > manage data organized in graph structures. > So, since it would involve my profession and the new boss is more

Re: [DAEMON] Tagging 1.0.6

2011-06-07 Thread sebb
On 8 June 2011 02:05, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 6/7/11 5:40 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 7 June 2011 18:37, Mladen Turk wrote: >>> On 06/07/2011 12:28 PM, sebb wrote: > Q: I saw some projects are using svn for releases instead > copying the artifacts trough the ftp. Are using this as well > or

[DAEMON] Maven deployment

2011-06-07 Thread sebb
I think the pom is set up correctly to perform a deployment of the Maven artifacts. Here are some commands I tried: mvn package deploy -Ptest-deploy - create jar in target/deploy mvn package deploy - actually deploy jar to Nexus snapshot repo [1] - needs login information to be provided, in sett

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Arshad Ansari
+1 I was thinking of implementing commons-graph like on my own. Didn't know if there was a dormant commons-graphs component. I would love to work on it. I'm new here, and haven't started contributing yet. However, I would love to contribute in anyway on this one. Thanks, Arshad On 8 June 2011 01:

Re: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy - take 3

2011-06-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 since I requested a zombie resurrection, it would be nice having a clear procedure on "how to revive dormant components" and put the whole procedure in our Wiki. Count on me if any help is needed! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Ratna Deo Dwivedi
+1 Would love to contribute on this . On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Arshad Ansari wrote: > +1 > I was thinking of implementing commons-graph like on my own. Didn't know if > there was a dormant commons-graphs component. I would love to work on it. > I'm new here, and haven't started contributi

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Sujit, thanks for your contribution, but just to avoid misunderstandings: Neo4J is a great graph database, OTOH commons-graph aims to create a higher-level APIs to interact with graphs and providing general purpose algorithms implementation for a large set of known problems, not just traversal/s

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Arshad, Ratna, your contributions will be more then welcome, looking forward to your suggestions/patches once/if the sandbox will be resurrected!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ratna Deo Dwivedi wrote: > +1 > Would love to

Re: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy - take 3

2011-06-07 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 07/06/2011 22:24, Phil Steitz a écrit : Thanks, all, for the great comments on the previous versions [1][2]. I have tried to incorporate them. Revised Dormancy Policy 0) To move a component to dormant requires a VOTE. A single -1 suffices to postpone the action; but a -1 in a dormancy vote

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 07/06/2011 21:41, Simone Tripodi a écrit : Hi all guys, I'm in the middle of moving job and in the new company they need to manage data organized in graph structures. So, since it would involve my profession and the new boss is more than encouraging me on participating on oss, I'm interested o