Hi Henri,
tested with both Java5 and Java6, mvn2 and mvn3 on Mac OS X
Artifacts and site look good.
+1 for me, great job!!!
Have a nice weekend,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Build works fine on Java
Hi all guys,
the ant build is no longer working anymore, build.properties files are
missing and lib/*.jar too, I propose to remove ant stuff before RC2.
Do you agree? Thanks in advance,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
--
+1
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> the ant build is no longer working anymore, build.properties files are
> missing and lib/*.jar too, I propose to remove ant stuff before RC2.
> Do you agree? Thanks in advance,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonet
+1
On 10 April 2011 10:23, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> the ant build is no longer working anymore, build.properties files are
>> missing and lib/*.jar too, I propose to remove ant stuff before RC2.
>> Do you agree? Th
Will that break gump?
Gary
On Apr 10, 2011, at 3:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> the ant build is no longer working anymore, build.properties files are
> missing and lib/*.jar too, I propose to remove ant stuff before RC2.
> Do you agree? Thanks in advance,
> Simo
>
> http://people.a
On 10 April 2011 12:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Will that break gump?
We'll find out.
But most Commons projects don't have Ant builds so Gump generally uses
Maven now.
> Gary
>
> On Apr 10, 2011, at 3:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys,
>> the ant build is no longer working anymore, buil
On 4/10/11 12:48 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> the ant build is no longer working anymore, build.properties files are
> missing and lib/*.jar too, I propose to remove ant stuff before RC2.
> Do you agree? Thanks in advance,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://w
On 4/10/11 5:01 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 April 2011 12:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Will that break gump?
> We'll find out.
>
> But most Commons projects don't have Ant builds so Gump generally uses
> Maven now.
>
IIRC, it is configured in the GUMP metadata which build system and
what config file to
Hello,
In the MathUtils class, there are a few assert statements. Most of them
are commented out, except the two following ones:
public static boolean equals(float x, float y, int maxUlps) {
// Check that "maxUlps" is non-negative and small enough so that
// NaN won't compare
-1 on account of tasks undone that won't be doable after 3.0, see
http://markmail.org/message/cvwbpvx25rysvjt7
:(
Matt
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Henri,
> tested with both Java5 and Java6, mvn2 and mvn3 on Mac OS X
> Artifacts and site look good.
>
> +1 for me, g
Le 09/04/2011 07:06, Henri Yandell a écrit :
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC2 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/maven/
>
> Website:
>
> http
On 4/10/11 12:48 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> the ant build is no longer working anymore, build.properties files are
> missing and lib/*.jar too, I propose to remove ant stuff before RC2.
> Do you agree? Thanks in advance,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://w
Phil Steitz skrev 2011-04-10 16:42:
> On 4/10/11 12:48 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> the ant build is no longer working anymore, build.properties files are
>> missing and lib/*.jar too, I propose to remove ant stuff before RC2.
>> Do you agree? Thanks in advance,
>> Simo
>>
>> http:/
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=7138&projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sun 10 Apr 2011 15:36:55 +
Finished at: Sun 10 Apr 2011 15:37:42 +
Total time: 47s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Specifically I assume you mean:
* removing the UTC constant from DateFormatUtils.
* removing superfluous vararg calls.
?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> -1 on account of tasks undone that won't be doable after 3.0, see
> http://markmail.org/message/cvwbpvx25rysvjt7
>
> :(
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 09/04/2011 07:06, Henri Yandell a écrit :
>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>
>> RC2 is available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/
>>
>> Maven artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/
Hi all guys,
sorry I'm late but I've been off for the whole day :P
Thanks Phil for taking care of the ant build, if it works now I don't
have a strong opinion why removing it.
Thanks Seb for taking care of the findbugs settings.
I'm going to check the latest issues and I'll push a new RC2 asap.
Sim
Hello Luc.
> [...]
>
> I propose to change the "maxUlps > 0" into "maxUlps >= 0" and either
>
> 1) comment out the corresponding asserts (just as the other ones in
> the file are commented out)
> 2) replace the asserts by a real test and throw a
> MathIllegalArgumentException
> 3) re
-0
Would like to see findbugs warnings sorted. I have not retested
after Luc's fixes, but I in addition to the ones he mentions, I am
not sure I understand the last one (on the site in ~bayard) and
whether or not it is in fact a bug. I think findbugs is complaining
because
*public* ExtendedMess
On 4/10/11 1:48 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello Luc.
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I propose to change the "maxUlps > 0" into "maxUlps >= 0" and either
>>
>> 1) comment out the corresponding asserts (just as the other ones in
>> the file are commented out)
>> 2) replace the asserts by a real test and
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> -0
>
> Would like to see findbugs warnings sorted. I have not retested
> after Luc's fixes, but I in addition to the ones he mentions, I am
> not sure I understand the last one (on the site in ~bayard) and
> whether or not it is in fact a bug.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> -0
>>
>> Would like to see findbugs warnings sorted. I have not retested
>> after Luc's fixes, but I in addition to the ones he mentions, I am
>> not sure I understand the last one (on
Currently we have 3 areas in which components live:
* Proper: Released components.
* Sandbox: Active pre-release components.
* Dormant: Inactive pre-release components.
There's an obvious (to me) need for Proper to split into active and
inactive. Given the existing name, inactive proper = attic.
Henri,
I can't prevent it but I am not for it.
So here's my +0 for each of the proposals:
Le 11 avr. 2011 à 07:12, Henri Yandell a écrit :
> * Proposal #1: Create a Commons Attic.
+0
(attic is even better than "not actively maintained")
> So:
> * Proposal #2: Move Jelly to Commons Attic.
+0
On 3/30/11 1:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 March 2011 21:37, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/30/11 1:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 30/03/2011 07:17, Phil Steitz wrote:
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
The distribution zips/tars
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 4/10/11 10:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Currently we have 3 areas in which components live:
>
> * Proper: Released components.
> * Sandbox: Active pre-release components.
> * Dormant: Inactive pre-release components.
>
> There's an obvious (to me) need for Proper to split into active and
> inac
I'm having a problem distinguishing "dormant" from "attic". Just because one
had releases and the other didn't they should go to different places for their
final resting place?
I'm not really clear on what happens to incubator projects that fail. I know
there is no "incubator dormant" or "in
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Phil Steitz
[snip]
>> * One last nit - why did we decide to dump the Ant build. Version
>> 2.6 seems to have a working Ant build. Why wouldn't the same build
>> work for 3.0. If you are OK with this, I will try to get the Ant
>> b
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> the ant build is no longer working anymore, build.properties files are
> missing and lib/*.jar too, I propose to remove ant stuff before RC2.
> Do you agree? Thanks in advance,
+1
- Jörg
On 2011-04-10, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Will that break gump?
It would have, yes. The current metadata tell Gump to use Ant for
building discovery. Given that discovery doesn't have too many
dependencies switching Gump to use mvn instead wouldn't be a big issue.
Using mvn for something as high up
32 matches
Mail list logo
