To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 3 April 2011 01:29, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:29:56 2011
> New Revision: 1088197
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088197&view=rev
> Log:
> added estimated next release
Not sure that's a good idea.
The DOAP is normally updated when the release has been mad
On 3 April 2011 01:23, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:23:32 2011
> New Revision: 1088193
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088193&view=rev
> Log:
> added missing RC profile (cannot be defined in parent)
Not sure this is needed if one uses Nexus, but won't do any ha
On 3 April 2011 01:04, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:04:15 2011
> New Revision: 1088190
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088190&view=rev
> Log:
> improved project description
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/discovery/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: commons/proper/di
OK, removing the release, thanks for reviewing
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:12 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 April 2011 01:29, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:29:56 2011
>> New Revision: 1088197
>>
>> URL: http:
On 2 April 2011 23:25, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Sat Apr 2 22:25:03 2011
> New Revision: 1088165
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088165&view=rev
> Log:
> added missing ASF license header
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/discovery/trunk/src/test/META-INF/services/org.a
I would be moe than pleased to follow the Nexus way, but I'm following
the guide on Wiki[1] to avoid mistakes.
Any recommendation? Thanks in advance!
Simo
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at
I suppose that's a mistake we inherited from the past, going to fix
the properties.
thanks,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 April 2011 23:25, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Sat Apr 2 22:25:03 2
done, thanks!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:15 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 April 2011 01:04, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Sun Apr 3 00:04:15 2011
>> New Revision: 1088190
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=10881
Hi all guys,
while attempting to release the RC1 release of digester-05, I got the
following error:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.5:deploy
(default-deploy) on project commons-discovery: Failed to deploy
artifacts/metadata: No connector available
On 3 April 2011 14:20, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> I would be moe than pleased to follow the Nexus way, but I'm following
Looks like Discovery is not using Nexus anyway.
> the guide on Wiki[1] to avoid mistakes.
> Any recommendation? Thanks in advance!
> Simo
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/C
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
... e.g. missing @Override, unnecessary cast.
I think these should be fixed before proceeding to a vote
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Apr 3, 2011, at 9:59, sebb wrote:
> ... e.g. missing @Override, unnecessary cast.
>
> I think these should be fixed before proceeding to a vote
+1.
Gary
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> Fo
On 4/3/11 7:33 AM, l...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: luc
> Date: Sun Apr 3 14:33:00 2011
> New Revision: 1088315
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088315&view=rev
> Log:
> allow 3 retries for testNextHex which is expected to randomly fail with low
> probability
Why not just change this to
thanks! of course it wasn't my intention :P
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Sun Apr 3 13:53:54 2011
> New Revision: 1088302
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1088302&view=rev
> Log:
> Castin
Done, thanks for the feedbacks! My Eclipse warning filters were just a
little too relaxed... :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2011, at 9:59, sebb wrote:
>
>> ... e.g. missing @Override, unnecessa
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Julius Davies wrote:
>
> >>> >> Nothing of this (including minimum requirement of Java 5) requires
> >>> >> automatically 2.x. As long as the API is *upward* binary compatible,
> >>> >> you can
> >>> >> improve the implementation using this fe
Hi all guys,
due to unsupported 'scp' protocol by default by mvn3[1], I'd suggest
to add, in the 'maven-3' profile in the commons-parent, the wagon-ssh
extension.
If there isn't any objection, I can take care of it, just let me know.
In the meanwhile, I'd add the wagon-ssh in the [discovery] pom, i
On 3 April 2011 20:35, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
>> Julius Davies wrote:
>>
>> >>> >> Nothing of this (including minimum requirement of Java 5) requires
>> >>> >> automatically 2.x. As long as the API is *upward* binary compatible,
>> >>> >> you
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> due to unsupported 'scp' protocol by default by mvn3[1], I'd suggest
> to add, in the 'maven-3' profile in the commons-parent, the wagon-ssh
> extension.
For now, you could try tweaking the "commons.deployment.protocol"
prope
Hi Rahul!
done, but I meant that in mvn3 the scp protocol doesn't come out of
the box, we need to plug the wagon-ssh extension.
For releasing the discovery, I switched to mvn2, but for future mvn3
use I'd suggest to add it in the maven-3 profile in the parent pom.
Have a nice day, all the best!
Sim
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Rahul!
> done, but I meant that in mvn3 the scp protocol doesn't come out of
> the box, we need to plug the wagon-ssh extension.
> For releasing the discovery, I switched to mvn2, but for future mvn3
> use I'd suggest to add it in the mave
Hi all guys!
we haven't released a new version of Apache Commons Discovery since
2008 (!!!), since I recently had to use it in a project I thought it
would have been fine having at least the Java5 generics support.
So, after 2 days of hard work - and thanks for feedbacks from dev
community - I'm he
Why did I not run into this when releasing codec? I used M3.
Gary
On Apr 3, 2011, at 17:04, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Rahul!
> done, but I meant that in mvn3 the scp protocol doesn't come out of
> the box, we need to plug the wagon-ssh extension.
> For releasing the discovery, I switched to mv
Forgot to mention that Vote will be open for 74 hours and will closed
2011-04-06T9:00pm CET :)
good night,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> we haven't released a new version of Apache Co
Agreed (apologies for the delay; life got, and is going to remain, very busy).
We should remove the CharSequence code I added. We should also review
the first batch of CharSequence changes.
I think it's fine to have this:
public int length(CharSequence seq)
I'll look into the removal if no one
I've rolled the code back. Now I'm thinking the following are
candidates to roll back to String:
public static String stripAccents(CharSequence input) {
public static String capitalize(CharSequence cs) {
public static String uncapitalize(CharSequence cs) {
and the following are candid
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 02:53, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/31/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> Just discovered that Clirr does not complain if the throws clause of a
>>> method or constructor is changed to add a new Exception.
>>> Seemed like a bug at first, but it
Hi Rahul,
We can find a SCXML relative project in GSoC 2011 ideas list page, it is
interesting, i have assigned it to me. But i think you are the best mentor
candiate for this project, i want to know that if you are interested in
mentoring this project ? If yes, i will be glad to see you and Gavin
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I've rolled the code back. Now I'm thinking the following are
> candidates to roll back to String:
>
>public static String stripAccents(CharSequence input) {
>public static String capitalize(CharSequence cs) {
>public static Strin
Any thoughts on fixing the 300+ checkstyle errors?
Gary
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> we haven't released a new version of Apache Commons Discovery since
> 2008 (!!!), since I recently had to use it in a project I thought it
> would have been fine having
Warnings :)
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Any thoughts on fixing the 300+ checkstyle errors?
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys!
>> we haven't released a new version of Apache Commons Discovery since
>> 2008 (!!!), since
Hi Gary!
I honestly even thought about it, so sorry! :( Since Discovery
activity has not been hight since 2008, I just thought adding the
missing generics support and nothing more :(
I don't think that should be a blocking issue since we've been
"overlooked" them for a long time, BTW if we think th
Hi Gary,
I honestly don't know why, I'm not in the position to reply, but while
trying to release the discovery-0.5-RC1 using mvn3 I got the error
below; after a little investigation I found the wiki page I reported
in my previous message that reports such "issue"...
Simo
[ERROR] Failed to exec
On 4/3/11 10:44 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Gary!
> I honestly even thought about it, so sorry! :( Since Discovery
> activity has not been hight since 2008, I just thought adding the
> missing generics support and nothing more :(
> I don't think that should be a blocking issue since we've been
>
-- Forwarded message --
From: Phil Steitz
Date: Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: So when will commons-io 2.1 be released?
To: Gabriele Kahlout
On 4/3/11 11:18 PM, Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking forward to refactor dp4j.com to use [1] before releasing 1.
I will be sending the 1.5.6 release announcement shortly. When
updating the pool website, I started by trying to use trunk, but
found the output confusing, since we are in process of changing the
groupId and package name. I decided, therefore, to publish based on
the updated 1_5_X branch. Once w
38 matches
Mail list logo
