[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [discovery] moving on to 0.5

Hi all guys, I've waited 72hrs and nobody expressed any objection, so I'll proceed updating the Discovery component. Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I recently needed the Discovery in

Re: [ALL] source compatibility - changes to throws clauses

On 1 April 2011 02:53, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 3/31/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote: >> Just discovered that Clirr does not complain if the throws clause of a >> method or constructor is changed to add a new Exception. >> Seemed like a bug at first, but it's not, because throws clauses are >> only checked

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-codec (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-codec has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue