+1
site, release notes and mvn artifacts are OK
fresh checkout from branch works fine
I would have upgrated the parent pom from 17 to 20, but that's non blocking
Have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Phil Steit
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I would prefer not to make that method static, since that means it
> cannot be overridden and it is used internally in this class as well
> as Spearman's. If we want to provide a convenience method with
> static signature, we should ad
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 3/29/11 4:43 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I would prefer not to make that method static, since that means it
>> cannot be overridden and it is used internally in this class as well
>> as Spearman's. If we want to provide a convenie
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "UsingNexus" page has been changed by sebbapache.
The comment on this change is: Add vote result info.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus?action=diff&rev1=23&rev2=24
---
On 29 March 2011 04:21, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/28/11 4:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I am having a heck of a time pushing the release out.
>>
>> I cannot seem to be able to create the sym links per the instructions in
>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
>>
>> I cannot get the symlinks.
On 29 March 2011 04:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/11 4:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > I am having a heck of a time pushing the release out.
>> >
>> > I cannot seem to be able to create the sym links per the instructions in
>> > http:/
On 29 March 2011 04:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/11 4:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > I am having a heck of a time pushing the release out.
>> >
>> > I cannot seem to be able to create the sym links per the instructions in
>> > http:/
The Commons Codec team is pleased to announce the commons-codec-1.5 release!
The codec package contains simple encoder and decoders for various formats
such as Base64 and Hexadecimal. In addition to thes widely used encoders
and decoders, the codec package also maintains acollection of phonetic
e
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
standardize on that process, adding some simple automation scripts
that RMs can choose to use or no
> >>> Modified:
> >>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java
> >>> URL:
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java?rev=1086057&r1=10
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
> Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
> standardize on that process, adding so
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
>> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
>> Commons web pages describes a process that works. I sug
On 29 March 2011 16:01, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> >>> Modified:
>> >>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java
>> >>> URL:
>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/co
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
>>> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
>>> Com
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>
> Yes, that is true.
>
> Also, had the [net] release been using Nexus, it would have required 2
> additional manual stages to close and then release the Maven
> artifacts.
> It is impossible to accidentally release Maven artifacts using Maven
> com
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need
I never saw the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail sent by Garry [1] with the subject line:
[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
which was sent on
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:00:42 GMT
It's not in my GMail bin, and I'm pretty sure it was not deleted as
part of spam cleanup.
Did you see it?
Obviousl
On 3/29/11 8:42 AM, sebb wrote:
> I never saw the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail sent by Garry [1] with the subject line:
>
> [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
>
> which was sent on
>
> Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:00:42 GMT
>
> It's not in my GMail bin, and I'm pretty sure it was not deleted as
>
I did, but it was on the same thread as [VOTE] Release Apache Commons
Codec 1.5-RC1 (I don't know why my GMail client merged the two thread
into one).
HTH,
Regards,
Julien
2011/3/29 sebb :
> I never saw the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail sent by Garry [1] with the subject line:
>
> [VOTE][RESULT] Release
Just for information, Gary sent two emails (amongst others):
- One with subject "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1"
at 2011/03/28 20:54
(giving his +1 for the vote)
- One with subject "[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Codec
1.5-RC1" at 2011/03/28 21:00
HTH,
Julien
2011/3/29 Ju
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Julien Aymé wrote:
> Just for information, Gary sent two emails (amongst others):
> - One with subject "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1"
> at 2011/03/28 20:54
> (giving his +1 for the vote)
> - One with subject "[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Common
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a rel
Thanks, mystery solved - I also now found it in the same e-mail thread.
S.
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Julien Aymé wrote:
>> Just for information, Gary sent two emails (amongst others):
>> - One with subject "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Co
On 3/29/11 8:01 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Modified:
> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation
sebb wrote:
> I never saw the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail sent by Garry [1] with the subject
> line:
>
> [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
>
> which was sent on
>
> Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:00:42 GMT
>
> It's not in my GMail bin, and I'm pretty sure it was not deleted as
> part of spam
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
Le 29/03/2011 17:16, sebb a écrit :
> On 29 March 2011 16:01, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> Modified:
>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/correlation/PearsonsCorrelation.java
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/mai
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar
Hi All,
Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec 2.0:
- Create a SVN branch for 1.x
Then in trunk:
- Correct Maven group id, which implies:
- Repackage to o.a.c.codec2
- Use Java 5
- Use JUnit 4
What else? Thoughts?
Thank you,
Gary
--
http://garygregory.wordpress
+1 for me Gary, I strongly support this kind of initiatives!!!
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec 2.0:
>
On 29 March 2011 18:44, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec 2.0:
>
> - Create a SVN branch for 1.x
>
> Then in trunk:
> - Correct Maven group id, which implies:
-1, see below.
> - Repackage to o.a.c.codec2
This forces all end
I assume this is derived from the SVN tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC1
The NOTICE files still show 2010.
Otherwise the code seems OK, builds and tests OK on 1.3 and 1.6.
The site does not have the Branding updates, but that is not a blocker
for this v
On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March
On 3/29/11 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
> I assume this is derived from the SVN tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC1
>
> The NOTICE files still show 2010.
That is a showstopper. Thanks, Sebb!
I will fix this and roll another RC this evening.
Phil
> Otherwise
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:52 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 18:44, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec
> 2.0:
> >
> > - Create a SVN branch for 1.x
> >
> > Then in trunk:
> > - Correct Maven group id, which implies:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar
On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 Ma
BTW, just noticed that Pool seems to be using a non-standard directory
layout - src/java rather than src/main/java.
But of course this is not a release blocker.
On 29 March 2011 20:10, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/29/11 11:54 AM, sebb wrote:
>> I assume this is derived from the SVN tag:
>>
>> http:
sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 18:44, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec
>> 2.0:
>>
>> - Create a SVN branch for 1.x
>>
>> Then in trunk:
>> - Correct Maven group id, which implies:
>
> -1, see below.
>
>> - Repackage to
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
Hi.
> We have been talking about moving away from interfaces as the
> preferred way to support people plugging in alternative
> implementations because they have in several places gotten "behind"
> due to the fact that adding anything to them breaks compatibility.
> We should probably continue tha
Hi Gilles,
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> We have been talking about moving away from interfaces as the
>> preferred way to support people plugging in alternative
>> implementations because they have in several places gotten "behind"
>> due to the fact that adding anything to them breaks comp
On 30 March 2011 01:15, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> We have been talking about moving away from interfaces as the
>> preferred way to support people plugging in alternative
>> implementations because they have in several places gotten "behind"
>> due to the fact that adding anything to them
On 30 March 2011 01:13, wrote:
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
> New Revision: 1086810
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810&view=rev
> Log:
> Upgraded parent pom, downgraded assembly plugin to working version.
What is the exact problem? I'm happy to raise a bug an
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
It's the last time I'll pick that route.
I cannot seem to have published the Maven bits to Maven places. There is no
1.5 here:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commo
On 30 March 2011 02:36, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
>
> I followed the whole song and dance from:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
>
> It's the last time I'll pick that route.
>
> I cannot seem to have published the Maven bits to Maven places.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:52 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 March 2011 02:36, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
> >
> > I followed the whole song and dance from:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
> >
> > It's the last time I'll pick that route.
> >
I've just double-checked, and the staged files were released at 29
March 2011 06:21 which is less than a day ago.
The files in the staging repo are dated Fri Mar 25 01:34:08, which is
what made me think it was taking too long.
So I won't send the e-mail yet.
On 30 March 2011 02:58, Gary Gregory
On 3/29/11 6:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
...
As I noticed this note, seems like a good point to interject a Maven war story:
I do not like Maven. I know I should, but it seems too complicated and too hard to use on complex projects. I may get ov
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
> On 3/29/11 6:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
>
> ...
> As I noticed this note, seems like a good point to interject a Maven war
> story:
>
> I do not like Maven. I know I should, but it seems
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:24 PM, sebb wrote:
> I've just double-checked, and the staged files were released at 29
> March 2011 06:21 which is less than a day ago.
>
> The files in the staging repo are dated Fri Mar 25 01:34:08, which is
> what made me think it was taking too long.
>
> So I won't
On 3/29/11 7:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
...
So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple means until it is
completely safe. I hadn't lost code (or any data through paranoid backups tha
That wasn't maven. That was a sloppy eclipse "create project"
implementation.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
> So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
> No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple means until it
> is completely safe. I hadn't lost c
On 30 March 2011 03:48, Gary D. Gregory (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> ]
>
> Gary D. Gregory closed CODEC-107.
> -
>
> Resolution: Won't Fix
In that
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 March 2011 03:48, Gary D. Gregory (JIRA) wrote:
> >
> > [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
> >
> > Gary D. Gregory closed CODEC-107.
> > -
On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 March 2011 01:13, wrote:
>> Author: psteitz
>> Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
>> New Revision: 1086810
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Upgraded parent pom, downgraded assembly plugin to working version.
> What is the
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
The distribution zips/tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.6-rc2/
Maven artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.6-rc2/maven/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~psteit
59 matches
Mail list logo
