On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:52 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 March 2011 18:44, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Now that codec 1.5 is out, I would like thoughts on this plan for codec > 2.0: > > > > - Create a SVN branch for 1.x > > > > Then in trunk: > > - Correct Maven group id, which implies: > > -1, see below. > > > - Repackage to o.a.c.codec2 > > This forces all end-users to edit their source and recompile. >
> I think that should be avoided unless the API is also being changed in > an incompatible way, and then only if it really is impossible to > maintain backwards compatibility. > Ok, sounds good. Gary > > - Use Java 5 > > +1 - may perhaps affect some end-users, but 1.5 offers lots of benefits > > > - Use JUnit 4 > > +1 - does not affect end-user > > > What else? Thoughts? > > > > Thank you, > > Gary > > -- > > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ > > http://garygregory.com/ > > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ > > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Thank you, Gary http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ http://garygregory.com/ http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
