To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi,
Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
vote ASAP so we can release this update promptly.
Not all binaries for all platforms have b
On 01/05/2011 01:21 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
vote ASAP so we can release this update promptl
Hi Mladen,
java sources work good, unfortunately I'm not able to compile C
sources on my mac.
On the release note, I'd replace 'Compatibility with 1.0.3' with
'Compatibility with 1.0.4', but that's not blocking.
Site[1] dir is empty, is it wished?
I don't see blocking issues, so I'm +1
All the best
On 01/05/2011 03:28 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Mladen,
java sources work good, unfortunately I'm not able to compile C
sources on my mac.
You will need Java Developer Package for Mac OS X
since Apple has first said it will deprecate Java,
and then sign a deal with Oracle.
However this require
Hi Mladen
Just to let you know I checked out the site, is fully online :)
thanks for the suggestions, very appreciated, I'll give a try!!!
All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 03:28
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
> testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
> renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
>
> This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
> vote ASAP so we can release this update promptly.
> Not
hola guys,
i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if
there is interest in adding such a functionality to commons-lang?
it's a simple algorithm and id be happy to contribute to this project...
http://projects.congrace.de/exp4j/download.html
have fun!
--
*frank asse
Frank,
I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves
variables, scopes, objects, etc.
Can you compare that to JEXL ?
paul
Le 5 janv. 2011 à 20:49, frank asseg a écrit :
> hola guys,
>
> i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if
>
Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
Why yet another?
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Frank,
>
> I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally
> involves variables, scopes, objects, etc.
> Can you compare that to JEXL ?
>
> paul
>
>
> Le 5 janv. 20
Hola Paul,
On 05.01.2011 20:51, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves
> variables, scopes, objects, etc.
> Can you compare that to JEXL ?
In comparison to JEXL i was looking for a possiblity to pass a simple
math expression to an eva
Hola Ted,
On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking about a pure
mathematical expresssion parser, intended for evaluating user input and
the like, not a turing complete grammer but simply a way to evaluate
thi
While we're at it, I also have a feature complete mathematical parser that
evaluates sets of expressions, variables and functions all at once over an
arbitrary domain. Go to http://zee.dev.java.net and see the code samples.
What do you think?
On Jan 5, 2011 3:18 PM, "frank asseg" wrote:
> Hola Te
Well... I never thought about such but maybe it's indeed useful.
Something short and tiny that is a lot more compact than the java syntax for
math but would have about the same capabilities.
I am not used to commit to lang so we'll have to wait for them to answer.
I find the classname Post
Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]?
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560
Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Lib
Hola Paul,
On 05.01.2011 21:49, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I find the classname PostfixExpression pretty bizarre... should it be simply
> MathExpressionParser ?
heh, you got me there, the naming is pretty awkward and stems from the
fact that an infix expression "2 + 2", where the operator stands bet
Hola Gary!
On 05.01.2011 22:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]?
I actually thought about posting on [math] but when i browsed the math
library i gained the impression that it's much more concerned with more
complex mathematical issues like integration of numer
Bonjour Frank,
I think of [lang] as "what is missing in java.lang", and, to be honest,
evaluating math expressions is not on my list ;)
Complex or not I expect math things in [math].
I, as others, am leery of introducing yet another expression language.
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
R
On 5 January 2011 12:21, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
> testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
> renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
>
> This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
> vote ASAP so we can release this
These things tend to be a slippery slope. Turing completeness is at the
bottom of that hill.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, frank asseg wrote:
> Hola Ted,
>
> On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy?
> sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking
I would recommend against this for [lang].
[lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or
"religious" aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements
that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, however useful,
isn't that closely related IMO.
Stephen
On 5 Janu
On Jan 5, 2011, at 18:05, "Stephen Colebourne" wrote:
> I would recommend against this for [lang].
>
> [lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or
> "religious" aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements
> that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, ho
+1
Phil
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for
> testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be
> renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5.
>
> This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please
> vote ASAP so we
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration.
Thi
27 matches
Mail list logo
