Well... I never thought about such.... but maybe it's indeed useful. Something short and tiny that is a lot more compact than the java syntax for math but would have about the same capabilities.
I am not used to commit to lang so we'll have to wait for them to answer. I find the classname PostfixExpression pretty bizarre... should it be simply MathExpressionParser ? paul Le 5 janv. 2011 à 21:18, frank asseg a écrit : > Hola Ted, > > On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote: >> Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? > sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking about a pure > mathematical expresssion parser, intended for evaluating user input and > the like, not a turing complete grammer but simply a way to evaluate > thigs like "log(2)^2.4" at runtime. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
