On 22 December 2010 07:43, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 December 2010 00:11, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers
>>> > >> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:55 PM,
Hi all mates,
I'd like to propose a small stuff reorganization in the `impl` package
that is growing up and we could arrange stuff in a cleaner way.
I propose the following packages:
org.apache.commons.pool2.impl
| generic
On 22 December 2010 11:52, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:52:09 2010
> New Revision: 1051863
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1051863&view=rev
> Log:
> made fields volatile
> removed synchronization on getters/setters methods
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/poo
On 22 December 2010 11:36, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:36:49 2010
> New Revision: 1051852
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1051852&view=rev
> Log:
> made classes fields volatile
> removed synchronization on getters/setters methods
Need to remove whichever @Guard
Hi Seb,
thanks a lot, there's always something to learn :)
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 December 2010 11:52, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:52:09 2010
>> New
going to fix it now, thanks :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 December 2010 11:36, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:36:49 2010
>> New Revision: 1051852
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apach
On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:43 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>
>>> But the RM should definitely *look at* the generated release notes and,
>> IMO, intentionally committing them is a good thing. Nothing generated
>> directly from maven has ever met my expectations in terms of formatting
>> and
>> conten
What goes in the generic package?
Gary
On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:43, "Simone Tripodi" wrote:
> Hi all mates,
> I'd like to propose a small stuff reorganization in the `impl` package
> that is growing up and we could arrange stuff in a cleaner way.
> I propose the following packages:
>
> org.apache
On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:43, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all mates,
> I'd like to propose a small stuff reorganization in the `impl` package
> that is growing up and we could arrange stuff in a cleaner way.
> I propose the following packages:
>
> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl
>
Hi Gary!
In the generic package would go the Generic(Keyed)ObjectPool and
related Configuration/Factory, and agreed, ref sounds better than
reference :)
What does anyone think about it?
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Gary Gr
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all mates,
> I'd like to propose a small stuff reorganization in the `impl` package
> that is growing up and we could arrange stuff in a cleaner way.
> I propose the following packages:
>
> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl
>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:36 AM, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:36:49 2010
> New Revision: 1051852
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1051852&view=rev
> Log:
> made classes fields volatile
> removed synchronization on getters/setters methods
>
> Modified:
>
>
> comm
There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I
would like to release IO 2.0.1
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
[ ] -1 No, because...
IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.01.-rc1/
Maven artifacts are here:
http://peop
Apologies, IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0.1-rc1/
Niall
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I
> would like to release IO 2.0.1
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration.
Thi
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi Phil,
>>
>> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl
>> | generic
>> | reference
>> | stack
>>
>> common stuff could be included directly under impl.
>>
>
> What exactl
just done, thanks Phil!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:36 AM, wrote:
>
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:36:49 2010
>> New Revision: 1051852
>>
>> URL: http://sv
18 matches
Mail list logo
