Now that the StringEscape system has a foundation to support
whatever's needed (one hopes) the next step is to define exactly what
escaping XML should do. As Jörg notes in LANG-66, XML is different for
XML 1.0 and 1.1. Great, let's support both then. StringEscapeUtils can
support the old method (fo
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote at Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 09:15:
> Now that the StringEscape system has a foundation to support
> whatever's needed (one hopes) the next step is to define exactly what
> escaping XML should do. As Jörg notes in LANG-66, XML is different for
> XML 1.0 and 1.1. Great, l
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
On 30/06/2009, bay...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Tue Jun 30 05:09:01 2009
> New Revision: 789561
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789561&view=rev
> Log:
> Added todo note
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/translate
On 30/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 30/06/2009, bay...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: bayard
> > Date: Tue Jun 30 05:09:01 2009
> > New Revision: 789561
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789561&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Added todo note
> >
> > Modified:
> >
> commons/prope
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> As pointed out http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816/#charsets and
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816/#charsets define the valid
> characters for XML 1.0 and 1.1.
>
> However, the escape functionality is actually different. If you transport
> XML (or HT
People use it but I personally did not have the cycles (or a usecase)
for further development.
What would you like to see fixed?
cheers
--
Torsten
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 21:43, Liam Coughlin wrote:
> Is this project still active? there's a 1.1 release sort of sitting dormant
> since ~2007...
>
