Hi All,
I have created a Patch having two methods and test cases for both, as
explained below. Any Comments ?
1) New Method: ByteArrayOutputStream.toInputStream
ByteArrayOutputStream exposes its byte buffers by toByteArray(), which
creates a fresh buffer and copy existing data to it.
A new method
Patch Attached.
On Nov 26, 2007 8:19 PM, Nikunj Trivedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have created a Patch having two methods and test cases for both, as
> explained below. Any Comments ?
>
> 1) New Method: ByteArrayOutputStream.toInputStream
> ByteArrayOutputStream exposes its byte
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1
+1
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
This is the fourth attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since the last go:
- The manifests now has the correct X-Compile-Target-JDK in them
- The manifests no longer mention Jakarta
- [LOGGING-118] Generate source and binary archives.
Release Notes:
h
...and we have a winner!
The vote has passed with the following votes:
+1 (binding): Torsten Curdt, Oliver Heger, Sebastian Bazley, Jörg
Schaible, Dennis Lundberg
+1 (non-binding at the time of his vote, but binding now): Ben Speakmon
+1 (non-binding): Nicolas de Loof,
I'm proceeding with t
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Phil Steitz wrote:
On Sep 3, 2007 8:33 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/2/07, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-05-15, Phil Steitz wrote:
I agree. So, probably best is to deprecate the current abstract
factories and move to single concrete factories with impl se
On 11/19/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/11/2007, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My preference is we stick with "Commons Foo" rather than "Apache
> > Commons Foo" which is more of a mouthfull. Specifically for the
> > manifest since we have "Vendor" entries which sa
On 11/20/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 6:56 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/18/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Nov 17, 2007 9:39 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A while ago, you pointed o
