Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-03-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Niall Pemberton > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Niall, > > > > > > Should this sort of thin

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:08 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/23/08, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > From the m2 documentation site: > > > > > > "Plugin Management contai

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-23 Thread James Carman
On 2/23/08, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From the m2 documentation site: > > > > "Plugin Management contains plugin elements in much the same way, > > except that rather than configuring plugin inf

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From the m2 documentation site: > > "Plugin Management contains plugin elements in much the same way, > except that rather than configuring plugin information for this > particular project build, it is intended to conf

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-23 Thread James Carman
On 2/23/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did you add it as a build plugin or as a build/plugins/plugin or a > > build/pluginManagement/plugins/plugin? > > > The above makes no sense to me - but I tried the same change as I did for > proxy. > >From the m2 documentation site:

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:31 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just tried adding this to commons parent - and when I try to run > > "mvn -Prc install" for commons-parent I get the following error: > > > > [ERROR] BUILD

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-23 Thread James Carman
On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just tried adding this to commons parent - and when I try to run > "mvn -Prc install" for commons-parent I get the following error: > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > [INFO] Error reading assemblies: No assembly descriptors found. > > Did you ad

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-21 Thread James Carman
On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry I don't really understand why you're referring to developer > pages and pom/skin sites? Where does that come into this? Someone suggested that I have a page which describes how to build the software. > > > Niall -

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niall, > > > > Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom? > > Possibly/probably - every component should have an assembly, but not

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:25 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Niall, > > > > > > Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom? > >

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-21 Thread James Carman
On 2/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niall, > > > > Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom? > > > Possibly/probably - every component should have an assembly, but not > sure if it would

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall, > > Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom? Possibly/probably - every component should have an assembly, but not sure if it would mess up doing pom or skin releases which don't. Niall > On 2/21/08, [EMAI

Re: svn commit: r629875 - /commons/proper/proxy/branches/proxy-1.0-work/pom.xml

2008-02-21 Thread James Carman
Niall, Should this sort of thing be in the parent pom? On 2/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: niallp > Date: Thu Feb 21 09:13:27 2008 > New Revision: 629875 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=629875&view=rev > Log: > Attach assembly to "package" phase in "r