[VFS] Release soon

There have been requests for a new VFS release, so I'll be working on that next, with hopefully an RC between tonight or at the weekend at the latest depending on what PRs are simplest and safest to bring in to master. Gary ---

Re: [VFS] Release 2.5.1 to address incompatibility

Uh, glad it was reported soon and you can cut a new release Gary. Will try to monitor inbox to review the release once it's out. CheersBruno On Monday, 6 January 2020, 2:07:19 am NZDT, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All: It looks like Commons VFS 2.5.0 contains an incompatibility for existin

[VFS] Release 2.5.1 to address incompatibility

Hi All: It looks like Commons VFS 2.5.0 contains an incompatibility for existing provider implementations. Therefore, an RC for 2.5.1 will be coming soon (maybe tonight.) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-750 Gary

[VFS] Release 2.3

Hi All: I plan on releasing VFS 2.3 ASAP. I know there are JIRAs and PRs that need review but I am not sure how many I'll get to review and bring in. What I need is already in there. Gary

[vfs] release 2.2

Hi All: I plan on releasing 2.2 ASAP to pick up an important fix for ZIP and JAR files. If you want to fix JIRA and fiddle around, please do so ASAP. Gary

AW: [VFS] Release road map?

It is in a good shape now, it only needs a compatibility statement for the release notes explaining the clirr-warnings and probably merging the hdfs write changes. Gruss Bernd Von: Gary Gregory Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Oktober 2015 19:36 An: Commons Developers List Betreff: [VFS] Release road

[VFS] Release road map?

Hi, What is left to do to release VFS? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Second Edition Spring Batch in Action

Re: [vfs] release notes (was: [jira] [Commented] (VFS-576) Simplify logging)

There have been some dependency upgrades, but I think its better to not introduce too many complications for 2.0 users. > Am 18.09.2015 um 21:10 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > I would also review all third party jars to make sure we are current. > > I would not mind revisiting our Java requirement

Re: [vfs] release notes (was: [jira] [Commented] (VFS-576) Simplify logging)

I would also review all third party jars to make sure we are current. I would not mind revisiting our Java requirement and use Java 7, but that can wait for 2.2. Gary On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I would manually edit the file to add the major themes of the release.

Re: [vfs] release notes (was: [jira] [Commented] (VFS-576) Simplify logging)

I would manually edit the file to add the major themes of the release. Gary On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Bernd wrote: > Gregory, > > I think now we are ready for an release. There are some open things > but I think it is better to come to an end. One thing which is open is > writing some re

[vfs] release notes (was: [jira] [Commented] (VFS-576) Simplify logging)

Gregory, I think now we are ready for an release. There are some open things but I think it is better to come to an end. One thing which is open is writing some release announcement wording on interface changes, new java requirement and new features. Should I put this into the (auto generated) REL

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

.1? I'd be happy to fix the versions for these > issues in JIRA, but I don't have the privs. > > Dave > > - Original Message - > > From: "Bernd Eckenfels" > To: "Commons Developers List" > Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:15:41

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

om: "Bernd Eckenfels" To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:15:41 AM Subject: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) Hello, Thanks for looking into this. Let me reply inline (and prune the mail): Am Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:03:20 -0500 schrieb :

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Hello, Thanks for looking into this. Let me reply inline (and prune the mail): Am Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:03:20 -0500 schrieb : > > a) check the src/changes/changes.xml: all action entries with bug > > numbers since the last release should be marked resolved (not > > closed - actually all bugs on th

RE: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

> -Original Message- > From: Bernd Eckenfels [mailto:e...@zusammenkunft.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 6:28 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Cc: dlmar...@comcast.net > Subject: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) > > Hello, > > Am Wed,

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

; From: "Bernd Eckenfels" > To: "Commons Developers List" > Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 3:29:45 AM > Subject: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) > > Hello, > > I checked the release-plugin documentation and I cannot find a way to > sp

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Goers" > Gesendet: ‎03.‎12.‎2014 06:52 > An: "Commons Developers List" > Betreff: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) > >> >>> Unfortunately, I don’t believe I >>> documented the release process but it should be similar to >>> http://wiki

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

t; Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 3:29:45 AM Subject: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) Hello, I checked the release-plugin documentation and I cannot find a way to specify different tags for the usage inside the prepared POM and the Tag which should be used for actually tagging

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Hello, I checked the release-plugin documentation and I cannot find a way to specify different tags for the usage inside the prepared POM and the Tag which should be used for actually tagging. I also think this is pretty uncommon, and I would go with using the final release version tag (commons-v

AW: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

- Ursprüngliche Nachricht - Von: "Ralph Goers" Gesendet: ‎03.‎12.‎2014 06:52 An: "Commons Developers List" Betreff: Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again) > > > Unfortunately, I don’t believe I > > documented the release process b

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

> > > Unfortunately, I don’t believe I > > documented the release process but it should be similar to > > http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4j2ReleaseGuide > > > > >

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > ok, lets start another try to get VFS released. (and refresh my > memories who is volunteering for the RM? - I would do it but I think we > need a PMC at close hand). > > Currently are 3 open blocker bugs, for one I have a patch

[VFS-180] merging? (was: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again))

Am Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:55:40 +0300 schrieb Alex : > Is there a chance to get VFS-180 in 2.1? Yes, of course. Looking through the patches I don't think it is particular complicated (but also I see some things I would do differently from 2012/04/24 14:04.) Instead of `name.getScheme().equals("webd

Re: [VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Is there a chance to get VFS-180 in 2.1? On 03/12/14 01:51, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: Hello, ok, lets start another try to get VFS released. (and refresh my memories who is volunteering for the RM? - I would do it but I think we need a PMC at close hand). Currently are 3 open blocker bugs, for on

[VFS] Release Preparations 2.1 (again)

Hello, ok, lets start another try to get VFS released. (and refresh my memories who is volunteering for the RM? - I would do it but I think we need a PMC at close hand). Currently are 3 open blocker bugs, for one I have a patch pending, the other two I am inclined to downgrade when nobody takes c

Re: [VFS] Release 2.1

Hello, we are working on a release. Thats why I closed or moved most of the blockers. It would be good if you can have a look at the remaining blockers (and maybe also check if all the open bugs are not critical). Gruss Bernd Am Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:53:28 + (UTC) schrieb dlmar...@comcast.net:

[VFS] Release 2.1

I would like to discuss a release plan for VFS 2.1. It's been a long time since the last release and there have been several enhancements and bug fixes[1]. Additionally, there is only one ticket marked as a blocker[2] which until yesterday has not been touched since late 2012. I'm asking for a r

Re: [VFS] release preparation: clirr report

I'm not sure how fine grained control we have or want to get over Clirr. For now, I'd rather know about all the differences. We can document how to interpret the Clirr report on the site and release notes as well. Gary On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > in prep

[VFS] release preparation: clirr report

Hello, in preparation of the VFS2.1 release I was reviewing the Clirr report. It has quite a number of errors, especially in regard to new Interface methods. # Method 'public long write(org.apache.commons.vfs2.FileContent)' has been added to an interface # Method 'public boolean isFile()' has bee

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:joerg.schai...@gmx.de] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 14:11 > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Subject: RE: VFS release > > Gary Gregory wrote: > > > How about warnings like: > > > > De

RE: VFS release

Gary Gregory wrote: > How about warnings like: > > Description ResourcePathLocationType > The serializable class FileNotFolderException does not declare a static > final serialVersionUID field of type long FileNotFolderException.java > /commons-vfs2/src/main/java/org/ap

RE: VFS release

lph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 18:59 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > Ok, how about pushing checkstyle.xml up to commons-parent and associated >

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 18:59 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > Ok,

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Ok, how about pushing checkstyle.xml up to commons-parent and associated > Maven magic? > Can we do that after releasing VFS 2.0? Ralph

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:24 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > >> -Original

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:09 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release >> >> >>

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:06 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release >> >>

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:09 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> > >> Altho

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:06 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:57 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 30 November 2010 20:3

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Although the wiki is fine it would be better to use a common checkstyle.xml. > > Yes! Can we put that in commons-parent and have it kick in automagically? > Not unless commons-parent is changed from a project of type pom to a project of t

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:57 PM, sebb wrote: > On 30 November 2010 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Ok, I've added some entries here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CodeStyle > > Thanks. > But I think the page should be flagged as DRAFT until there is general > agreement. > For example, I think impor

Re: VFS release

On 30 November 2010 21:00, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Ok, I've added some entries here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CodeStyle >> >> See the latest VFS commits for this order of imports: java, javax, org, com. >> Same as [io] and [lang]. >> > >

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:00 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Ok, I

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Ok, I've added some entries here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CodeStyle > > See the latest VFS commits for this order of imports: java, javax, org, com. > Same as [io] and [lang]. > Although the wiki is fine it would be better to use a co

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 15:57 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > On 30 November 2010 20:38, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Ok, I've added some entries here: http://w

Re: VFS release

ailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 14:43 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release >> >> >> On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> > On 30 November 2010 17:16, Gary Gregory >> wrote

RE: VFS release

sday, November 30, 2010 14:43 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: > > > On 30 November 2010 17:16, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >> Hm... I just noticed that VFS follows a different import conven

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: > On 30 November 2010 17:16, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Hm... I just noticed that VFS follows a different import convention that >> other [commons] projects. >> >> In [lang] and [io] for example, we list java packages first and the >> project's packages la

Re: VFS release

ard imports, except perhaps for static imports of constants. > > Gary > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:00 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release &g

RE: VFS release

wiki this as a guideline? Too micro? Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:00 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:40 AM,

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:00 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Hi All: &g

Re: VFS release

On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I've removed unused imports. > > Any objection to organizing imports consistently? > Actually, those all show up in the checkstyle report. The ones you changed are all a consequence of the recent changes I made. I'd missed those

RE: VFS release

Hi All: I've removed unused imports. Any objection to organizing imports consistently? Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 17:51 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: VFS re

RE: VFS release

> -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 17:51 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: VFS release > > I've gone through Jira and tried to make fixes where it looked like they would &g

RE: VFS release

errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles: [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 201

RE: VFS release

Any objection to adding a "bin" directory to svn:ignore to make the Eclipse project look clean? Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 17:51 > To: Commons Developers List > Subje

RE: VFS release

Looking good with m2eclipse! Gary > -Original Message- > From: Gary Gregory > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 14:57 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: VFS release > > Hm... this? http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/installing-m2eclipse.html > > Gary &

RE: VFS release

Hm... this? http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/installing-m2eclipse.html Gary > -Original Message- > From: ralph.goers @dslextreme.com [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 14:50 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release >

Re: VFS release

.8:eclipse (default-cli) on > project commons-vfs2: Execution default-cli of goal org.apache.maven. > plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin:2.8:eclipse failed: String index out of range: > -5 -> [Help 1] > > I want to set up VFS for Eclipse but I do not want to create a .classpath > b

RE: VFS release

lipse failed: String index out of range: -5 -> [Help 1] I want to set up VFS for Eclipse but I do not want to create a .classpath by hand! Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 17:51 > To:

Re: VFS release

On Nov 27, 2010, at 3:18 PM, sebb wrote: > On 27 November 2010 22:50, Ralph Goers wrote: >> I've gone through Jira and tried to make fixes where it looked like they >> would require changes that could impact binary compatibility. > > Binary compatibility with what? > V2.0. Since we are brea

Re: VFS release

On 27 November 2010 22:50, Ralph Goers wrote: > I've gone through Jira and tried to make fixes where it looked like they > would require changes that could impact binary compatibility. Binary compatibility with what? > There are many bugs related to the FTP variants and after taking several >

VFS release

I've gone through Jira and tried to make fixes where it looked like they would require changes that could impact binary compatibility. There are many bugs related to the FTP variants and after taking several passes I've decided to hold off for the time being. Most of the code either isn't thre

Re: commons-vfs release?

Just create one Jira for "multi-threading issues". Please go ahead and fix them. Ralph On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:02 AM, sebb wrote: > There are quite a few private instance fields that are not changed > after construction, but which are not final. > > OK if I add the final qualifer to them? > >

Re: commons-vfs release?

There are quite a few private instance fields that are not changed after construction, but which are not final. OK if I add the final qualifer to them? Also, SoftRefFilesCache and DefaultFileMonitor use a boolean to communicate between threads, but don't use synch. Adding volatile would fix this.

Re: commons-vfs release?

No. I'm taking a pass through the issues to see if there are any more with patches that can easily be applied and then it would be great to get it done. Ralph On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > Hi, > > are there any blocking bugs that would stop releasing of vfs-2.0 ?

commons-vfs release?

Hi, are there any blocking bugs that would stop releasing of vfs-2.0 ? If yes, which ones would that be? -h - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.or