Also, if someone is thinking about doing this, they better be ready to
take on updating and testing our Maven Commons Release Plugin which
checks in the site and deliverables to Subversion.
Gary
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 6:35 PM sebb wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 17:28, Piotr P. Karwasz
> wro
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 17:28, Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> On 19.01.2025 14:30, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le sam. 18 janv. 2025 à 19:14, Piotr P. Karwasz
> > a écrit :
> >> The changes in `logging.apache.org` took close to 1000 work hours (2
> >> developers for 3 months
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 13:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le sam. 18 janv. 2025 à 19:14, Piotr P. Karwasz
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi Gilles,
> >
> > On 18.01.2025 18:09, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > > Yes, it's likely a lot of work.
> > > Maybe a GSoC project (for which the candidate should some
Hi Gilles,
On 19.01.2025 17:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Le dim. 19 janv. 2025 à 15:06, Gary Gregory a écrit :
This means writing documentation in Javadoc or Markdown which is now
supported by the JDK.
We could still consider Piotr's proposal (a general move to "Asciidoc"):
https://asciidoct
Hi Gilles,
On 19.01.2025 14:30, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hi.
Le sam. 18 janv. 2025 à 19:14, Piotr P. Karwasz
a écrit :
The changes in `logging.apache.org` took close to 1000 work hours (2
developers for 3 months) and were financed by the Sovereign Tech Fund
(now Agency). Commons has also severa
Hi.
Le dim. 19 janv. 2025 à 15:06, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I don't think we need a site beyond a "simple" Maven site, let me explain...
>
> I like what projects like Juneau did which is to put all the documentation
> in Javadoc.
>
> When you go to https://juneau.apache.org/ and cli
Hi all,
I don't think we need a site beyond a "simple" Maven site, let me explain...
I like what projects like Juneau did which is to put all the documentation
in Javadoc.
When you go to https://juneau.apache.org/ and click "Documenation", you go
to https://juneau.apache.org/site/apidocs-9.0.1/i
Hi.
Le sam. 18 janv. 2025 à 19:14, Piotr P. Karwasz
a écrit :
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> On 18.01.2025 18:09, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > Yes, it's likely a lot of work.
> > Maybe a GSoC project (for which the candidate should somehow
> > demonstrate the capacity to achieve the result _before_ being
> > a
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 at 17:18, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le sam. 18 janv. 2025 à 17:22, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 11:05 AM sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 at 15:03, Gilles Sadowski
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > TL;DR; Quite some time ago, INFRA offer
Hi Gilles,
On 18.01.2025 18:09, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Yes, it's likely a lot of work.
Maybe a GSoC project (for which the candidate should somehow
demonstrate the capacity to achieve the result _before_ being
accepted, so that we don't end up doing twice as much work...)?
The changes in `logg
Le sam. 18 janv. 2025 à 17:22, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 11:05 AM sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 at 15:03, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > >
> > > > > TL;DR; Quite some time ago, INFRA offered the possibility to move
> > > > > the website(s) under "git" control. Is
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 11:05 AM sebb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 at 15:03, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > > > TL;DR; Quite some time ago, INFRA offered the possibility to move
> > > > the website(s) under "git" control. Is this related?
> > > > If not, and there is a big change, should we re
Le sam. 18 janv. 2025 à 17:05, sebb a écrit :
>
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 at 15:03, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > > > TL;DR; Quite some time ago, INFRA offered the possibility to move
> > > > the website(s) under "git" control. Is this related?
> > > > If not, and there is a big change, should we r
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 at 15:03, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > > TL;DR; Quite some time ago, INFRA offered the possibility to move
> > > the website(s) under "git" control. Is this related?
> > > If not, and there is a big change, should we reconsider the move?
> >
> > This is not related AFAICT.
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
