So I did something really stupid on my end possibly not having commons parent
installed; I don't understand how I corrupt it repeatedly but good news is
my latest try seemed successfull.
My apologies to all for shouting wolf.
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
>
> Shall I upload the site?
>
> Cheers,
>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:22 PM, henrib wrote:
>
>
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't really under stand the "commons-parent pom is just above
>> jexl's trunk" comment as in our subversion hierarchy its not *above*
>> and the only way it can find it is by downloading/installing in you
Shall I upload the site?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
henrib wrote:
> If it is styled in Blue - as the Jexl 1.0 site looks - and if you have the
> menu for reports (cobertura, etc), then you're good and I'm doing something
> totally stupid on my end.
> If site is styled in Red, no menu for reports
Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>
> I don't really under stand the "commons-parent pom is just above
> jexl's trunk" comment as in our subversion hierarchy its not *above*
> and the only way it can find it is by downloading/installing in your
> local repo in the usual manner - unless you've put i
henrib wrote:
> To be complete, the site is generated ok when the commons-parent pom is just
> above jexl's trunk with parent parent version 12. But then the rc publishing
> fails later when the site is regenerated from what was published (lacking
> the parent pom above.)
>
> Seems to me this is r
If it is styled in Blue - as the Jexl 1.0 site looks - and if you have the
menu for reports (cobertura, etc), then you're good and I'm doing something
totally stupid on my end.
If site is styled in Red, no menu for reports, then we look at the same
problem.
Thanks for checking.
Cheers,
Henrib
S
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:10 PM, henrib wrote:
>
> To be complete, the site is generated ok when the commons-parent pom is just
> above jexl's trunk with parent parent version 12. But then the rc publishing
> fails later when the site is regenerated from what was published (lacking
> the parent pom
Hi folks,
just generated the site on Mac OS 10.4 and it looks good - the site says
it it 2.0-SNAPSHOT (is this correct)?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
henrib wrote:
> No, that does not change the output.
> But with a parent pom version 11, it looks ok.
>
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> ...
>> D
To be complete, the site is generated ok when the commons-parent pom is just
above jexl's trunk with parent parent version 12. But then the rc publishing
fails later when the site is regenerated from what was published (lacking
the parent pom above.)
Seems to me this is related to the getRelative
No, that does not change the output.
But with a parent pom version 11, it looks ok.
Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> ...
> Does it make any difference if you remove the leading slash from the
> href="/...html" attribute on the elements in site.xml?
> ...
>
--
View this message in context:
http:/
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:55 PM, henrib wrote:
>
> I've been fighting with the JEXL environment (on a Mac) to get it to generate
> an 'mvn site' correctly; in particular, the reports are not included and the
> css are wrong.
>
> I duplicated the same env on the Mac and on a Windows box, clean from
11 matches
Mail list logo
