Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Brekke
> * [X ] Do you agree that such an evolution might make sense > * and if so, should I > ** [ ] add a VFS-global (static) flag to enable this wrapper-like-mode or > ** [X ] can I fork VFS to put the current head into maintainance (or more > correct "dormant") mode and start with e.g. VFS 2.0? > --

RE: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Jörg Schaible
Mario Ivankovits wrote: [snip] > So, my questions are: > * [X] Do you agree that such an evolution might make sense > * and if so, should I > ** [ ] add a VFS-global (static) flag to enable this > wrapper-like-mode or > ** [X] can I fork VFS to put the current head into > maintainance (or more > c

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! > Sounds like your > solution would work for directories as well, if VFS didn't attempt to > enumerate all the files in all the directories along the path? > Yes, that is the plan :-) What I wrote about files count for directories too, for me this attribute is just a different value ;-) Cia

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Brekke
We also have the situation where the directories are also hidden. So we need to be able to traverse hidden directories as well. Sounds like your solution would work for directories as well, if VFS didn't attempt to enumerate all the files in all the directories along the path? On Wed, May 21, 20

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Martin! > Just wondering, how would a client of VFS enumerate > Just the folders in a directory e.g. in order to > Render a tree of files? > As today. Disabling the file-type determination should be optional only and isn't something I'd change during the first development iteration. The diff

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Filip Defoort
Hi Mario, On 5/21/08, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, my questions are: > * [ ] Do you agree that such an evolution might make sense > * and if so, should I > ** [ ] add a VFS-global (static) flag to enable this wrapper-like-mode or > ** [ ] can I fork VFS to put the current head

RE: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Oberhuber, Martin
Hi Mario, Just wondering, how would a client of VFS enumerate Just the folders in a directory e.g. in order to Render a tree of files? He needs to know here what items are folders and What items are files (which gets more difficulte When symbolic links with file-flavor or folder-flavor Are involv