> * [X ] Do you agree that such an evolution might make sense > * and if so, should I > ** [ ] add a VFS-global (static) flag to enable this wrapper-like-mode or > ** [X ] can I fork VFS to put the current head into maintainance (or more > correct "dormant") mode and start with e.g. VFS 2.0? >
-- Jeffrey D. Brekke Wisconsin, USA brekke at apache dot org ekkerbj at gmail dot com jbrekke at wi dot rr dot com
